[Merged]Peer-reviewed technical paper to appear in mainstream journal

[deep]

Just noticed this over on 911blogger.com - it's from Steven Jones:

1. Recently had a technical paper accepted for publication following peer-review (three reviewers!), in a mainstream journal. Hopefully it will be out soon. Please read the entire paper when it comes out -- not just the title! You will see a little humor coming through (I hope you'll see it), but the overall thrust is very serious: countering popular myths about the destruction of WTC 7 and the Towers -- and pointing out areas where we the authors find agreement with NIST (and FEMA). Yes, we agree with NIST that the Towers fell at nearly free-fall speed, for example -- and that the WTC fires were NOT hot enough to melt structural steel. Don't you? The paper should come out about the same time as Truth Week, and hopefully add to the momentum of that week (beginning April 16th).

(bolding mine)
​

So what will the new "standard" be? Multiple peer-reviewed publications in mainstream journals?

Don't worry, you guys have a couple weeks to think about it.

 

[The Big Dog]

So what will the new "standard" be? Multiple peer-reviewed publications in mainstream journals?

Don't worry, you guys have a couple weeks to think about it.

BWHAHAHA! It appears to be a humor piece that they reviewed, and sent to a "mainstream journal."

It is clearly NOT in a peer reviewed journal.

Cripes, you guys even screw up the easy stuff don't you??

Did you see the piece of crap they "published" about the financial impact of the attacks? It was dismantled here this morning.

 

[OldTigerCub]

Just noticed this over on 911blogger.com - it's from Steven Jones:

(bolding mine)
​

So what will the new "standard" be? Multiple peer-reviewed publications in mainstream journals?

Don't worry, you guys have a couple weeks to think about it.

I can't help but wonder if the "mainstream journal" he mentioned might be this one:

 

[beachnut]

Just noticed this over on 911blogger.com - it's from Steven Jones:

(bolding mine)​

So what will the new "standard" be? Multiple peer-reviewed publications in mainstream journals?

Don't worry, you guys have a couple weeks to think about it.

Yes, if you take out all the false information, you can get published. But it sounds like 9/11 truth is like LCFC, watered-down hearsay. The publication may be soon a joke if they let the woo show, just like Jones and his journal.

 

[Sizzler]

BWHAHAHA! It appears to be a humor piece that they reviewed, and sent to a "mainstream journal."

It is clearly NOT in a peer reviewed journal.

Cripes, you guys even screw up the easy stuff don't you??

Did you see the piece of crap they "published" about the financial impact of the attacks? It was dismantled here this morning.

huh?

 

[Mr.Herbert]

What the hell is Bubble Hash?

(from High Times)

 

[The Big Dog]

huh?

Sorry, were you asking something? I was too busy reading his comments about buying cans of oats. And his comments about how another engineer told him his analysis was filled with errors (true), and it would wreck his career (his colleagues at BYU basically agreed!) and how he hopes he doesn't end up in the "camps."

Dr. Jones has LEFT THE BUILDING!

WOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

 

[AZCat]

Sorry, were you asking something? I was too busy reading his comments about buying cans of oats. And his comments about how another engineer told him his analysis was filled with errors (true), and it would wreck his career (his colleagues at BYU basically agreed!) and how he hopes he doesn't end up in the "camps."

Dr. Jones has LEFT THE BUILDING!

WOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

I love how in his point #8 (excerpted below) he puts the word "event" in quotation marks.

8. And please think of a "place of refuge" or two where you and family might go, should a nasty "event" take place in your city or near you. PRE-planning and preparation are much better than 20-20 hind-sight. We can get through this, together...

How similar is this to the ravings of any other loon?



On Edit: I just noticed the question and response further down the page. More of the same.

Comment

Thank you
Dr. Jones you inspire me and give me hope. Your continued work fuels that hope for so many, I for one am grateful that you have chosen the path of truth. Thank you so much. I hope we don't meet in the *camp*, but if we do, I would be honored to be there with you.
I also agree that we must all prepare for our own survival in the event of another false flag. We talk about it all the time, but who here has actually done anything about it?

Response

Thanks, GW, Cheri

And you're so right, Cheri -- something I'm trying to emphasize -- it TIME to get PREpared, now. There is a time at dusk when work can still be done, and preparations made for the night which may be long. It is dusk, that is my sense and that of many friends. Fortunately, many are waking up to the need to get some foods, water, warm clothing, medications, etc... and a place to go to if you have to get out...

 

[Blender Head]

Why does the 9/11 Truth Movement want to embarrass themselves like this?

 

[defaultdotxbe]

Just noticed this over on 911blogger.com - it's from Steven Jones:

(bolding mine)​

So what will the new "standard" be? Multiple peer-reviewed publications in mainstream journals?

Don't worry, you guys have a couple weeks to think about it.

does this mainstream journal have a name?

 

[WildCat]

What the hell is Bubble Hash?

(from High Times)

I don't know, but it's just a matter of time before a truther uses that as his screen name.

 

[Good Lt]

Why do I get the feeling this will be like everything else the Troof movement has shoveled in the past six years?

It sounds suspiciously like the pre-release hype for LCFC. Undebunkable. The end of "debunkers." The bombshell.

hype Hype HYPE HYPE nothing.

 

[WildCat]

does this mainstream journal have a name?

"Hustler".

 

[LashL]

So what will the new "standard" be? Multiple peer-reviewed publications in mainstream journals?

Don't worry, you guys have a couple weeks to think about it.

What makes you think there will be a new standard? Until we (and you) actually see what it is that Jones is all excited about, what journal he's talking about, what the article is about, what the contents of the article are, and whether it is adequately peer-reviewed, there is no way of assessing it and no way of assessing the veracity of Jones' announcement. Time will tell.

It is worth bearing in mind, though, that leaders of inaptly self-named "truth" movement have long been prone to making giddy, hopeful, pronouncements and announcements that promise a lot but fail to deliver anything but disappointment, so you may not want to go too far out a limb in assuming that this one will be any different than all of those made in the past.

 

[beachnut]

Just noticed this over on 911blogger.com - it's from Steven Jones:

(bolding mine)​

So what will the new "standard" be? Multiple peer-reviewed publications in mainstream journals?

Don't worry, you guys have a couple weeks to think about it.

http://911blogger.com/node/14692 (911Blogger.com, the place for real dumb people to read up on pure stupid; boy that is stupid stuff; how can they contain the ignorance that posts there?)

6. I've been talking for many months about the importance of getting some food and water stored up, for three months at least! Better for longer, like a year. I've been asked -- where do you get cans of wheat, oats, rice, beans, etc?

Is the food so you can go away, lock yourself up, eat mushrooms, and think up insane ideas on 9/11? Oh, the next false flag operation. Woo woo, the train for Happy Dale left with Jones almost 4 years ago.

I guess Dr Jones does not need more nuts when he is hiding out from the evil people who did 9/11. Is Jones nuts, or just plan insane from making up so much fantasy thermite stuff?

 

[Sizzler]

Sorry, were you asking something? I was too busy reading his comments about buying cans of oats. And his comments about how another engineer told him his analysis was filled with errors (true), and it would wreck his career (his colleagues at BYU basically agreed!) and how he hopes he doesn't end up in the "camps."

Dr. Jones has LEFT THE BUILDING!

WOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

LOL. I just finished reading that too.

Parnoid delusions aside, I am quite curious what "mainstream journal" is publishing this paper. I think by three reviewers he meant the "mainstream journal's" reviewers.

 

[beachnut]

LOL. I just finished reading that too.

Parnoid delusions aside, I am quite curious what "mainstream journal" is publishing this paper. I think by three reviewers he meant the "mainstream journal's" reviewers.

Journal for mental health, how Jones has fallen from being rational to making up stuff. (was he ever)

 

[Quad4_72]

Just noticed this over on 911blogger.com - it's from Steven Jones:

(bolding mine)
​

So what will the new "standard" be? Multiple peer-reviewed publications in mainstream journals?

Don't worry, you guys have a couple weeks to think about it.

I think Jones is confused. "Peer review" does not mean "Having your buddies read over it while having a couple of brews."

 

[T.A.M.]

So am I to understand that the S. Jones paper was peer reviewed by his own paranoid crack pots, and then submitted and published in a throw away mag?

It will be interesting to see:

(1) Which journal/magazine it is published in
(2) Which section of the journal it is published in
(3) The replies to it, in future additions (should be priceless)

TAM

 

[The Big Dog]

LOL. I just finished reading that too.

Parnoid delusions aside, I am quite curious what "mainstream journal" is publishing this paper.

Mad Magazine?