SteveGrenard
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2002
- Messages
- 5,528
This:
Steve wants to create a modern medical myth. To become another Andrew Wakefield, or Paul Brodeur. You know: Scare people.
Go hereto Bayer's Alka Selzter websites, this one and links to the side:
http://alkaseltzer.com/as/as_extra_strength.htm
Now consider the fact that there are people, maybe millions of them, have no way of knowing, without web access. Is there anything on these website(s) that the manufacturer of Alka Serltzer admits to with respect to precautions and advisories that should be included with the package for PC and web derived users?
Note that Steve doesn't provide any sources of this one-time case.
It may be a one time case, unpublished, that I am referring to but as another poister
has pointed out and as the general literature on CHF, pulmonary edema and hypertension
underscores, it is not the only case. The evidence for the need for precautions is self-evident ... and is self-admitted by Alka Seltzer's maker.
Note that Steve has gone from asking leading questions about the possible danger of Alka Selzer to establishing that there are problems with not just sodium, but also aspirin.
There is a book on pharmacology by Goodman and Gilman. Why don't you study the aspirin
parts and get back to me.
Note that Steve is not interested in negative information that proves him wrong.
I am very interested in information that says it is not necessary to use a warning label on the package or a package insert to warn buyers/users with feet on the ground who are not
availaling themselves of information on the internet or don't have access to same. Or are too
old or too sick or too uninformed to do so.
This will be a classic example of a pseudoscience scare. One more for the article.
This would be hysterical if it were not for the fact that every pharmacology std text and Bayer Healthcare itself admits to the issues brought up in this thread. But it is typical of some to yell pseudoscience when there is any effort to inform the populace and
hurt big pharma sales of potentially harmful products, whether Rx or OTC. Thanks for letting us know where you stand. But do yourself a favor and take some time to study the
matter before your accusation of pseudoscience turns out to be the most pseudononymous thing that has come out of this discussion.
So before you proceed further with your threats do your due diligence.
Last edited:
