DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
There's nothing criminal about misrepresenting oneself as an engineer. It's completely legal under all conceivable circumstances.
I know, because I'm a lawyer.
Respectfully,
Myriad
There's nothing criminal about misrepresenting oneself as an engineer. It's completely legal under all conceivable circumstances.
I know, because I'm a lawyer.
Respectfully,
Myriad
Are you condoning the impersonation of engineers?
There's nothing criminal about misrepresenting oneself as an engineer. It's completely legal under all conceivable circumstances.
I know, because I'm a lawyer.
Respectfully,
Myriad
If so, that doesn't make it right. Do you have any morals?
The real question is, does AE911Truth have any morals?
The answer is quite obvious.
If so, that doesn't make it right. Do you have any morals?
Excusing your behaviour by theirs won't cut it.
Whatever you think that site is doing wrong does not give people the right to do what they did.
Does a reporter going undercover to expose corruption, incompetence or scams fall under this condemnation by you?
Comparing a group of trolls attacking a perfectly legal website to a professional reporter exposing real crime?
Excusing your behaviour by theirs won't cut it.
Whatever you think that site is doing wrong does not give people the right to do what they did.
Archbishop,As an Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church, I assure you that my morals are beyond reproach (except, of course, for that pesky original sin thing).
Respectfully,
Myriad
Excusing your behaviour by theirs won't cut it.
Whatever you think that site is doing wrong does not give people the right to do what they did.
It's the other way around- excusing their behavior by claiming "ours" was "illegal" or "immoral" won't cut it.
Everyone who participated in exposing the lies of AE911Truth (myself included) were perfectly justified and had every right (even a responsibility) to do so.
It doesn't matter how you try and spin it- AE911Truth was wrong. Exposing that lie was necessary and moral.
What did they lie about? They had no fake names on until YOU put them there.
The entire basis for Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth is that they are architects and engineers. They beg for credibility not only by their very name, but by their constantly-shouted roster.
As many suspected, the credibility of those individuals was in question. Through the actions of several members, that lie was exposed. The qualifications of those individuals and the "joining process"- if you will- was proven to be fraudulent.
The fact of the matter is- you cannot show that prior to "our" actions- there were no fake names. Through our actions, that claim was tossed into great doubt- and made irrelevant, to boot.
You cannot demand credibility as a respectable organization if any Joe Schmoe off the street can pretend to have credibility. AE911Truth believed that they could gain credibility by increasing their roster size... clearly, that was the wrong assumption to make.
And, let's not forget these remaining "experts" have added exactly nothing to the debate.
Again...You faked being engineers. That is your problem not theirs.
I very much doubt anyone would have been stupid or sad enough to fake their name on that roster, until the JREF trolling mob came along and showed their true colours.
Who was fake on that list apart from the people that the members here faked?
You faked being engineers. That is your problem not theirs.