That's ok. They look like Freddy Kruegerish blades. Almost brought some for my collection.I'm not sure, but I think they're paintbrushes.
That's ok. They look like Freddy Kruegerish blades. Almost brought some for my collection.I'm not sure, but I think they're paintbrushes.
They are. Now I'm trying to come up with some kind of 'paint you a hellishly bad picture' pun but they're all coming up lame. Obviously. I fail at this succubus thing.I'm not sure, but I think they're paintbrushes.
7?*dances around in some veils*
Then check the Book Review thread/forum.I clearly asked for "references for reading, building a skeptic mindset and the such." I'm not obviously looking for an "answer to all experiences", but further develop my critical thinking is exactly what I'm after, and I'd like suggestions for places to start.
Having a "weakness" does not turn someone to "woo woo"; lack of critical thinking does.Everyone has weaknesses. It's entirely possible and natural for someone to be rational and logical in all aspects but one regarding one of their weaknesses.
See, I think it's not entirely impossible for some unidentified natural phenomenon to exist which causes something to appear to move by itself. It'd be rare because it would depend on a *very* specific set of circumstances (therefore it appears to be random), but if real it could explain part of the reason why, at some point in history, we needed to come up with the idea that there are invisible, immaterial beings out there that can affect the material world. Because I'm sure things like that have happened for thousands of years.
Having a "weakness" does not turn someone to "woo woo"; lack of critical thinking does.
Your not too familiar with Quantum Theory are you?Hi Cresur,
Such an event is theoretically possible.
The atoms that make up the bottle (or anything for that matter) all jostle around in a random manner. If all those atoms happened to jostle in the same direction at the same time it would cause the bottle to move.
Of course the chance of this happening is essentially zero.
But still theoretically possible![]()
Define woo?So there are no shades of grey about this. You either are "woo-woo" if you lack critical thinking, or you "possess" critical thinking and you are automatically not "woo-woo".
If your daughter one day is taking a real long time to get home from school and you worry that something bad have happened, even though there is no evidence to support this, you are now completely and irrevocably "woo-woo".
Define woo?
Having a "weakness" does not turn someone to "woo woo"; lack of critical thinking does.
I asked you to define woo. I didn't ask Locknar nor did he attempt to define it. He mentioned what is absent but that isn't the definition. Now can you define woo?From Locknar:
Apparently is what you end up having when you don't have critical thinking instead.
In my example your critical thinking would tell you to not worry because there have been no known accidents or incidents at school or anything, so, purely based on the evidence, you should not worry that something bad is the reason for your daughter being late.
But you care for her and you do anyway. So now you are "woo-woo", because no weaknesses can cloud the judgment of a "rational thinking person", ever. When you think rationally, you are infallible.
That's two woos by the way.
I asked you to define woo. I didn't ask Locknar nor did he attempt to define it. He mentioned what is absent but that isn't the definition. Now can you define woo?
This is your thread so no I'm not going to ask him. You can do a search in google by typing define woo-woo. If you were really serious about your question I don't believe you'd hesitate so I am questioning your sincerity.I'm new on this board and I don't know the lingo. That interpretation was what I could extract from the way I've seen its usage. He used the word, you should ask him instead.
woo-woo
adj. concerned with emotions, mysticism, or spiritualism; other than rational or scientific; mysterious; new agey. Also n., a person who has mystical or new age beliefs.
If you were really serious about your question I don't believe you'd hesitate so I am questioning your sincerity.
The one in your OP. now that you know a definition of woo (or woo-woo) can you tell me why worrying about a late child isn't woo? And then tell me why a psychic like Silvia Browne is woo?Which question?
Indeed. I figured they'd be more flattering than a bulky sheet.
I'm going to haunt in style.

now that you know a definition of woo (or woo-woo) can you tell me why worrying about a late child isn't woo? And then tell me why a psychic like Silvia Browne is woo?