• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Question for Heiwa

Architect said:
I know, it's shocking, isn't it. I'd be black affronted if I were in that position, and I'm only a mere architect.
Click to expand...

I used to be an engineer then I discovered electricians made more money.
 
GregoryUrich said:
That's one sweet cherry Gravy. That single panel (out of 19) was from the exact center of the building. The landing gear went straight down the hallway in the middle of the building with absolutely nothing (with the possible exception of some poor soul) in it's way. No other panels on the south side were knocked out. Everthing else had to go through 250 tons of stuff (on each floor).
Click to expand...


Did you ever engage your brain before posting?
 
Heiwa said:
My 'theory' is evidently the facts in my article about WTC1 that show that the wall columns in the initiation zone were pretty strong and didn't collapse as proposed by, e.g. Nist and Z P Bazant. They were intact after the top part above started to move and didn't cause the alleged release of potential energy from above.

The evidence for my 'theory' is there for anybody to watch on the videos.
I doubt there is any testimony of people to the contrary.
Click to expand...

Videos prove it all. Figures don't count. Failed physics right.
 
uk_dave said:
Thermite?
Click to expand...

As toilet paper? No, we use water. The simplest and best means in that case. OT of course. T is this magic potential energy that suddenly is released - 250+ columns synchroniously collapsing - causing WTC1 to collapse on 911 according Nist and allowing the house above to move down a little. The cause! The only cause why WTC1 collapsed.

I cannot see all these columns collapsing before the roof starts to fall down. It is as simple as that.

If the roof starts to fall before the columns in the fire zone collapse, something else is happening. Potential energy alone cannot suddenly make the roof high above to fall before the columns below break.

I actually see that the columns in the fire zone are being intact, when dust and smoke burst out through the windows between the relevant columns and this is 5-6 seconds after the roof started to drop down in the first place. Every video of the collapse shows just that.

In my now famous article I actually calculate the energy released by the top above ... and conclude it cannot damage the structure below. It is too small! Nist avoids to calculate the energy involved. Why can't Nist do a simple energy calculation?

The top above will only bounce on the structure below and some parts of the not very rigid top above should fall down beside the structure below in the worst case.

In the best case it would just drop down a few meters and extinguish the fire.

It is no magic there. It is physics. Heated steel behaves like that.

Nist suggests without any calculations the opposite. All columns collapsed. And then the strength of the structure below was too little.

I show that the strength below is very good and will just deform a little. Like a spring.

So I ask Nist politely to re-do their calculations.

And Nist then suggests that there was no potential energy released but 6 or 11 floors above fell down!?!? I find that ... strange. It is not mentioned in the original Nist report that I quote.

Finally , I cannot understand why all these strange signatures on JREF Forum attacks me for ... whatever ... when they should instead ask Nist to do correct calculations and not just invent different causes without substance. For the sake of our children.
 
Last edited:
Heiwa said:
T is this magic potential energy that suddenly is released - 250+ columns synchroniously collapsing - causing WTC1 to collapse on 911 according Nist and allowing the house above to move down a little. The cause! The only cause why WTC1 collapsed.
Click to expand...

You are silly.
 
Apollo20 said:
BJE and Architect:

I do have some thoughts about Heiwa's paper - I am working on some of the relevant issues myself right now - but unfortunately I have been too busy to get involved with this thread. Nevertheless, I felt compelled to comment on the JREFers condescending "you must be mentally ill" approach to Heiwa's ideas. I've seen too much of it before on JREF, some of it directed at yours truly; but it really is an inappropriate method of debating don't you think?
Click to expand...

If you really had your head on straight we would not make fun of you.

We are not debating here.
 
Heiwa said:
Finally , I cannot understand why all these strange signatures on JREF Forum attacks me for ... whatever ... when they should instead ask Nist to do correct calculations and not just invent different causes without substance.
Click to expand...


Heiwa, how would it be possible for NIST or anyone to do any correct calculations when you insist NO planes hit the towers?
 
Last edited:
Please keep on topic and avoid insults and bickering or this thread will face moderated status.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Cuddles
 
Heiwa,

We're till waiting for you to explain what caused the damage and fires in the WTC towers.

Do you retract your statement here?:

"9/11/01 I was at Freiberg, Saxony, Germany. My daughter called and
asked me to watch TV news. But we had no TV in our old house built 1590
ca. Only later I had the opportunity to watch the 911 crash sites on video.

"And it was quite evident to me that due to lack of any airplane wreckage
anywhere that no airplanes ever caused the incidents. Furthermore - the
structural damages at WTC and Pentagon and the hole in the ground at
Pennsylvania cannot have been caused by airplanes for more reasons than
that there are no airplane wreckage parts anywhere."

http://www.911blogger.com/node/2406#comment-64389
Click to expand...
 
I think that Heiwa has departed us. Draw your own conclusions.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom