Jonnyclueless
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2007
- Messages
- 5,546
Perhaps you can quote the part then? Please, share.
Perhaps you can quote the part then? Please, share.
http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report_Pref.htm
"Our aim has been to provide the fullest possible account of the events surrounding 9/11 and to identify lessons learned."
It's funny when people don't even remember the source of what it is they're regurgitating.
Now how could they meet their aim when evidence is withheld and destroyed?
realitybites
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2006
- Messages
- 1,066
I'm curious now. Truthers have long maintained that Islamo-fascism is not a threat. Now some tapes of an Islamo-fascist (supposedly being tortured to get information about terrorism) are destroyed.
Truthers like LastChild are now very concerned about this. Is the truth movement finally starting to accept the threat of radical Islam?
Truthers like LastChild are now very concerned about this. Is the truth movement finally starting to accept the threat of radical Islam?
RedIbis
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2007
- Messages
- 6,899
I think we've already covered the obnoxiousness of crossthread stalking. I'm not sure, but it might be against the rules. It certainly breaches the rules of maturity.
I don't know where's the evidence?
Last edited:
Jonnyclueless
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2007
- Messages
- 5,546
Checking twoofer rules:
#! no matter what, government behind everything.
Nope, sorry reality, that's jsut not possible. So therefore lies may have to be used such as claims that no transcripts were made, when those transcripts were used by the 9/11 commission.
So there you have it the CIA destroyed tapes of a make believe organization that had nothing to do with 9/11 and doesn't even exist. And we're all coockoo for coco puffs.
Um, I'm just curious. Are you now pretending that the 9/11 Commission Report, which discusses the nineteen hijackers extensively, did NOT assert that al Qaeda was behind the attacks? Are you willing to acknowledge that there is at least one whale in Moby Dick? Are there any limits to fantasist madness?
twinstead
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Messages
- 12,374
The evidence supporting the 'official story' is out there in the spotlight for ALL to see. It's huge, and you know it.
Your dishonesty shows in an answer like this. Instead of dealing with this evidence, whenever it is brought up you just pretend there isn't any, and ask "where's the evidence". You then declare the official story suspect when we don't, for the bazillionth time, lay out the entire body of evidence of the official story, from all its myriad sources, at your royal feet.
I might as well debate my 8 year old.
Last edited:
Hello! Are you referring to the CIA Tapes being destroyed? Do I have to remind you that you started this thread?
realitybites
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2006
- Messages
- 1,066
Did they confess to being al qaeda terrorist involved in 9/11? Got the tape of that?
I think it's that time when you puff out your cheeks, cry, get beet-red, flap your arms, and start screeching, "YOU FAIL!"
So there was no need for an investigation? Cause you saw it on the boobtube? LOL
RedIbis
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2007
- Messages
- 6,899
Man, you jump off into some crazy conclusions, don't you. We're merely discussing the fact that Kean and Hamilton believe the investigation was compromised by obstruction.
Truly, Ahab's downfall is his ruthless and rigid focus, without seeing the larger picture.
You seem to derive pleasure from presenting yourself as a mental-defective. Why? Are you a masochist? How can it suit your aims to be regarded as a complete fool?
realitybites
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2006
- Messages
- 1,066
If you want evidence of Islamo-fascism, that's one place to start.
You seem to be of the mind that it doesn't exist and that it's just some boogeyman created by the government to scare us into complacency.
If it truly is something that is made up, then why go to the trouble of faking an interogation, taping the interogation, only to destroy the fake tapes and get caught?
Jonnyclueless
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2007
- Messages
- 5,546
He's asking for evidence now? So what, the only evidence now is the video footage of the interrogation of some low level Al Qeada ops (a group that doesn't exist to twoofers)?
I love that mentality. The only evidence is that which they can't see, no matter how unimportant it is. Forget all that forensics, science, testimony, money trails, admissions, etc etc. We can ignore al that important stuff. Why use that when we have conjecture.
I love that mentality. The only evidence is that which they can't see, no matter how unimportant it is. Forget all that forensics, science, testimony, money trails, admissions, etc etc. We can ignore al that important stuff. Why use that when we have conjecture.
Jonnyclueless
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2007
- Messages
- 5,546
No, you disagreed to the claim that they both agree that Al Qeada was behind the attack. Please follow up on this assertion of yours. Please show us how they don't think Al Qeada was behind the attacks.
Are we supposed to be tricked into thinking that the 9/11 Commission conducted the investigation that identified the hijackers? I don't think your ploy will work. The commission did not identify the hijackers, nor did it establish why the buildings fell down. Its purposes were different.