• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

911 Investigation obstructed

Good Lt said:
Was that English?

It's the 9-11 TRUTH MOVEMENT claiming to know TEH TROOF.

And yet, it was only this year that they learned that 19 hijackers actually flew planes into the WTC, not radio controlled planes, space beams, missiles, holograms, etc.

They're still coming to grips with the fact that the towers collapsing had something to do with planes slamming into them and fires and structural damage.

Pathetic that it's taking them going on a decade to know what the rest of the world figured out was happening in the moment, but predictable of small minds.
Click to expand...

Pathetic is all this about CIA tapes coming out now over 6 years later. Some idiots have been walking around this whole time claiming to know what the truth is based on a report where the writers of that report are clearly not happy. If you don't have the 9/11 commission report what do you have debunker?

Never mind I got this one. You have excuses, apologies, and irrelevant nonsense.
 
Reality Believer said:
The etiquette of this forum requests that you give a considered editorial on linked media. Please do so.
Click to expand...

slight tangent:

I might as well try to learn something about forum etiquette.

what's the issue?

eta: never mind: I get it. You have to have registered with the NYT. (it's free)
 
Last edited:
calebprime said:
slight tangent:

I might as well try to learn something about forum etiquette.

what's the issue?
Click to expand...
Last Child, like 99% of all troofers, likes to copy and paste without actually commenting. This is just poor form, but par for the course for troofers.

See, it would be nice if LC actually tried to explain what relevance this had to 9/11, but when iyou're incapable of independant thought copy and paste is all you can do.
 
WildCat said:
Last Child, like 99% of all troofers, likes to copy and paste without actually commenting. This is just poor form, but par for the course for troofers.

See, it would be nice if LC actually tried to explain what relevance this had to 9/11, but when iyou're incapable of independant thought copy and paste is all you can do.
Click to expand...

ah. I've done the same myself.
 
WildCat said:
Last Child, like 99% of all troofers, likes to copy and paste without actually commenting. This is just poor form, but par for the course for troofers.
Click to expand...

You seem to think no one can read what you are obviously lying about. I don't comment? LOL

WildCat said:
See, it would be nice if LC actually tried to explain what relevance this had to 9/11, but when iyou're incapable of independant thought copy and paste is all you can do.
Click to expand...

Isn't that the point genius? It's what debunkers always do.

"Prove the steel was evidence of something" When the debunker knows the steel has been hidden and destroyed.

"Prove the put options were evidence of something" When the debunker knows it was only investigated as far as not being linked to al queda

"Prove the tapes were evidence of something" When the debunker knows the tapes are destroyed.

Cowardly
 
LastChild said:
Really? Did I write that letter? How do you know better? Come on who's the next debunker to step up and make excuses and apologies for failure?
Click to expand...

yep I get a check from the government called social security.
 
LastChild said:
Pathetic is all this about CIA tapes coming out now over 6 years later. Some idiots have been walking around this whole time claiming to know what the truth is based on a report where the writers of that report are clearly not happy.
Click to expand...

Wow, the irony of truthers never ceases to amaze me. Do you realize that the average truther has been walking around for six years, claiming to know the truth, based on "reports" from kool-aid serving, blame America first conspiracy nuts?

If you don't have the 9/11 commission report what do you have debunker?

Never mind I got this one. You have excuses, apologies, and irrelevant nonsense.
Click to expand...

The NIST Report, the agreement of the entire scientific community against the CT, the agreement of firefighters who were there, and, of course, the opinion of Kean and Hamilton concerning the conspiracy theories.
 
LastChild said:
You seem to think no one can read what you are obviously lying about. I don't comment? LOL



Isn't that the point genius? It's what debunkers always do.

"Prove the steel was evidence of something" When the debunker knows the steel has been hidden and destroyed.

"Prove the put options were evidence of something" When the debunker knows it was only investigated as far as not being linked to al queda

"Prove the tapes were evidence of something" When the debunker knows the tapes are destroyed.

Cowardly
Click to expand...


Stop lying. No steel was hidden or destroyed. The put options have been thoroughly investigated. The tapes have nothing to do with 9/11.
 
Shocking that there isn't more support for Kean and Hamilton who clearly state that a crime was committed that hindered their ability to provide the fullest possible account of the attacks.
 
pomeroo said:
Stop lying. No steel was hidden or destroyed. The put options have been thoroughly investigated. The tapes have nothing to do with 9/11.
Click to expand...

It's all true. Though you don't need to know any of it to come to your conclusions about the truth. You decided on the truth before any of it was investigated at all.
 
RedIbis said:
Shocking that there isn't more support for Kean and Hamilton who clearly state that a crime was committed that hindered their ability to provide the fullest possible account of the attacks.
Click to expand...
There can never and will never be "the fullest possible account" of any historical event. That you insist on such an impossible standard reveals the pathetic state of the truth movement.
 
RedIbis said:
Shocking that there isn't more support for Kean and Hamilton who clearly state that a crime was committed that hindered their ability to provide the fullest possible account of the attacks.
Click to expand...

People who really do want the truth would support them. Though I doubt you will find many people like that here. They're having too much fun pretending to debunk things. They're too invested to start questioning now.
 
WildCat said:
There can never and will never be "the fullest possible account" of any historical event. That you insist on such an impossible standard reveals the pathetic state of the truth movement.
Click to expand...

Looks like someone hasn't read the preface to the Commission Report.
 
WildCat said:
There can never and will never be "the fullest possible account" of any historical event. That you insist on such an impossible standard reveals the pathetic state of the truth movement.
Click to expand...

There won't be much of an account at all with people like you around. Bush wanted exactly that. No investigation.

Make up history how it suits your needs.
 
Last edited:
"This message is hidden because LastChild is on your ignore list."

Ah..... :-)

And I just don't miss the Catty Chan doll of idiocy.
 
WildCat said:
So you are no longer a truther and support Kean and Hamilton's assertions that 9/11 was 100% carried out by al Qaeda?
Click to expand...

How do you know what Kean and Hamilton assert? You obviously didn't read the Report.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom