• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Question for Heiwa

Heiwa, what benefit do you gain from lying to people who know you're lying? That really is odd behavior. Why not stop?
Click to expand...
Gravy

I think it's because he's deluding himself that he's not been 100% debunked? A delusional engineer. Blinkin' great....

A.
 
Last edited:
Gravy said:
Ever wonder what offspring would result if Malcolm Kirkman and Max Photon could mate?
Click to expand...

No.

I try not to imagine such things. My therapist says the damage done could well be permanent.
 
It has, in the words of the chants from the football terracing, "all gone quiet over there".....
 
bje said:
Heiwa,

I see you got Christopher Bollyn in on the Estonia stuff:

http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2007/01/estonia-particle-weapon-poofed-wtc.html

Seems appropriate.
Click to expand...

You are right about the Estonia. I was the first to debunk the official fantasies about the sinking 1994 already 1996 in an article in the biggest Swedish daily Dagens Nyheter for professional reasons and the authorities are still trying to wriggle out from their own net of lies. This has encouraged many other people of all kind to query the official conclusions and request corrections and clarifications and a completely new investigation. I am just following the developments from the side lines, as usual. It takes time to reveal cover-ups of this type, i.e. government trying to hide their own incompetence.

Latest steps by the authorities, actually the Swedish government, were 2006 to appoint some new 'experts' to explain the sinking based on the official lies and to ask the Swedish Police Laboratory to verify whether videos and pictures of the wreck as part of the investigation have been manipulated or enhanced (by the investigators?). We will know the results March 2008.

A very interesting development is that one Swedish Member of Parliament requested 2004 a completely new investigation (actually using copy/paste many of my findings). Same MP, Mr Tolgfors is today minister of defence ... and handling the matter in the (new) government.

Evidently the authorities and their agents have over the years called me personally unintelligent, unscientific, unreasonable, conspiratorial, a person wanting to bring down the government, etc, etc, and been trying to destroy my reputation and business ... but they failed I am glad to say. I am just a source of proven facts and true information based on sound principles and simple analysis. Nothing beats that. Good for my business. Safety at sea.

My venture into the 911 mine field - actually the WTC1 collapse - was just watching some kids jumping in my bed.

Hope you enjoyed my latest article. Some proposals made in this forum have actually improved it. That's why I participate here from time to time. Most contributions at JREF forum are of course just rubbish.
 
Heiwa said:
You are right about the Estonia. I was the first to debunk the official fantasies about the sinking 1994 already 1996 in an article in the biggest Swedish daily Dagens Nyheter for professional reasons and the authorities are still trying to wriggle out from their own net of lies.
Click to expand...
Don't be ridiculous. The Estonia didn't sink.

My venture into the 911 mine field - actually the WTC1 collapse - was just watching some kids jumping in my bed.
Click to expand...
Next time tell them not to jump on your head.
 
Heiwa some people whom I consider well-versed in relevant fields concerning 911 have called YOUR paper rubbish.

Perhaps the time is now for you to submit it to a legitimate peer review and prove them wrong? I mean seriously, how many experts would you need to call your paper rubbish before you actually begin to believe them?
 
Last edited:
Gravy said:
Don't be ridiculous. The Estonia didn't sink.

Next time tell them not to jump on your head.
Click to expand...

Gravy has posted >12 300 comments since 03/2006 (20 per day) - all rubbish. A record?

Keep in mind the Membership Agreement and do not use personal attacks or insults to argue your point.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson
 
Last edited by a moderator:
twinstead said:
Heiwa some people whom I consider well-versed in relevant fields concerning 911 have called YOUR paper rubbish.

Perhaps the time is now for you to submit it to a legitimate peer review and prove them wrong? I mean seriously, how many experts would you need to call your paper rubbish before you actually begin to believe them?
Click to expand...

Some people whom I consider well-versed in the fields the paper is about think it is pretty good. Particularly how it is adapted for children. So there are differences of opinions. Nothing new there!

But let your people point out some factual errors in the article and I will of course look at them. Copy/paste the facts with corrections and explanations why they are relevant and why they make all rubbish. Be constructive, not obstructive.
 
Heiwa said:
Some people whom I consider well-versed in the fields the paper is about think it is pretty good. Particularly how it is adapted for children. So there are differences of opinions. Nothing new there!

But let your people point out some factual errors in the article and I will of course look at them. Copy/paste the facts with corrections and explanations why they are relevant and why they make all rubbish. Be constructive, not obstructive.
Click to expand...


But Heiwa, in another thread I put it to you - with technical references - that your views on the inherrently fire resistant nature of structural steelwork was unsupported by facts or professional opinion. Strangely you wholly failed to respond to this, despite your ongoing requests for a critique.

I can therefore only assume, as others have done, that you are unwilling or incapable of engaging in such a dialogue and thus query why you are wasting your time on this forum.

Of course that approach is, in itself, fairly typical of 99.9% of the Truth Movement when confronted by real facts, rather than make-believe and wishful thinking.

I do hope your Estonia paper is better informed, but from the suggestions of vast conspiracies and secret killings I really do have my doubts.
 
Can someone here please tell me how someone can reach the keys on a keyboard while wearing a straightjacket?

I Am He
 
I Am He said:
Can someone here please tell me how someone can reach the keys on a keyboard while wearing a straightjacket?

I Am He
Click to expand...
Voice recognition.

Let's see, Everyone thinks his ideas on the Estonia are nuts, the same is true for his view on 9/11. And he still doesn't see a pattern.
 
It must be good voice recognition software to understand what is being said through all that drool? :D

I Am He
 
Heiwa said:
My venture into the 911 mine field - actually the WTC1 collapse - was just watching some kids jumping in my bed.
Click to expand...


That was a bad decision, don't you think, Heiwa?

Tell us about your claim that no planes hit the WTC towers, no plane hit the Pentagon, and no plane crashed in Shankesville, PA on 9/11/2001. Do you still believe that?
 
Heiwa said:
I actually in my article calculate the potential energy in the part above - abt 340 kWh - not very much actually - after an alleged fall of 3.7 meters, and points out that this energy is not applied to the structure below!!
Click to expand...
What was it applied to, a giant tortoise?
 
Heiwa said:
But let your people point out some factual errors in the article and I will of course look at them.
Click to expand...


They have and you failed to address them. You also refused to provide the data I requested repeatedly. As with other 9/11 Truthers, it is perfectly consistent when you deliberately ignore inconvenient facts.

Why is that, Heiwa? Aren't you the least bit ashamed?
 
Heiwa said:
And the world's structural engineers and forensic scientists should be embarrassed. But they are too clever and well paid for that or worry about their pensions or jobs or futures to say anything ... they just nod. It is embarassing. That's Heiwa's Law Fantasy.
Click to expand...
Fixed that for ya! You don't have to thank me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom