Brand New CT sub-group: No-Sounders

[IMST]

Well it seems to be the debunker position that if there were any explosions on 9/11 the many many audio devices that were in the area wouldn't have failed to pick them up. That is whenever the debunker is able to stay on topic. So if that is their case then debunkers should have no problem showing me all the different recordings that captured these explosives sounds recorded on 9/11...



That's the first one. You guys get all the other ones. There should be at least 10 or 20 if not more.

Ready?

Set?

GO!

I claim that if there were demolition charges (not any damn explosion) than any mic that picked up the collapse would first pick up the charges. Demolition charges would be loud compared to anything else present. A smaller electrical explosion, for example, might not be. I have no idea as to the context of the video you just showed, but it sure doesn't show the collapse.

 

[LastChild]

I claim that if there were demolition charges (not any damn explosion) than any mic that picked up the collapse would first pick up the charges. Demolition charges would be loud compared to anything else present. A smaller electrical explosion, for example, might not be. I have no idea as to the context of the video you just showed, but it sure doesn't show the collapse.

I'm not just talking to you. Besides are you sure about that? Are you claiming those explosive sounds heard in that video wouldn't necessarily be picked up by other microphones? Gee that sounds like my argument. As for them not being as loud as demolition charges I beg to differ and so do others...

 

[DGM]

I'm not just talking to you. Besides are you sure about that? Are you claiming those explosive sounds heard in that video wouldn't necessarily be picked up by other microphones? Gee that sounds like my argument. As for them not being as loud as demolition charges I beg to differ and so do others...

Who saying they wouldn't be picked up? Besides you. Now show some with the towers or WTC 7 in them. There are several you know. Hey if you can confirm the time/content any video in the area will do.

We'll wait.

 

[LastChild]

Who saying they wouldn't be picked up? Besides you.

I am and the fact that none of you can support your own argument on your own terms. It is the claim of the debunker if there were explosive sounds at ground zero it would have been picked up by all of the many recording devices documenting the event. So where are the many recordings of these known explosive sounds I have provided? Were these sounds only caught by one microphone? What if that microphone had been turned off? Would that mean the sound never happened? If a tree falls in the woods? LOL This is what you ask of the conspiracy theorist no? Well let's see you prove your own theory. No dodging.

Now show some with the towers or WTC 7 in them. There are several you know. Hey if you can confirm the time/content any video in the area will do.

It's my claim if there were explosions they wouldn't necessarily have been picked up remember? Are you arguing my point now? Did I turn you around? LOL

We'll wait.

No need to wait you've been debunked. Gee it's gotten awfully quiet in here. Is everyone’s mic on? LOL

 

[SDC]

Why is LC's avatar, appearing to depict a sulky child standing next to a pile of trash, so, well, exactly right in this case?

 

[LastChild]

Why is LC's avatar, appearing to depict a sulky child standing next to a pile of trash, so, well, exactly right in this case?

One more fail. Anyone else?

 

[WildCat]

More faked audio in a video! Or were there bombs still going off after the towers collapsed?

 

[beachnut]

Why is LC's avatar, appearing to depict a sulky child standing next to a pile of trash, so, well, exactly right in this case?

I thought it was a smirk and he was next to a big pile of steaming BS and he was getting ready to fling it all over.

 

[A W Smith]

still waiting for that video example of a silent CD lost child. are you having a problem finding one?

 

[LastChild]

More faked audio in a video! Or were there bombs still going off after the towers collapsed?

Oh nice try. But you fail too. Unless you have some kind of proof its fake you really can't be trotting out that lame excuse every time you fail. It's getting old. I mean I could have just come out and claimed all the explosive sounds have been removed by the media or the NWO. But that would be lame.

Besides I think I might have found another recording of this explosion from another source. But for some reason it's not nearly as loud when this microphone picked it up. In fact if the tower was collapsing at the same time it never would have been heard at all. Have you found that one yet?

Maybe I’ll show it to you all later if no one here can meet the challenge. You know? The debunker standard?

 

[332nd]

At what time was the video taken?

 

[LastChild]

I thought it was a smirk and he was next to a big pile of steaming BS and he was getting ready to fling it all over.

You fail too. But what else is new?

 

[Brainache]

I am and the fact that none of you can support your own argument on your own terms. It is the claim of the debunker if there were explosive sounds at ground zero it would have been picked up by all of the many recording devices documenting the event. So where are the many recordings of these known explosive sounds I have provided? Were these sounds only caught by one microphone? What if that microphone had been turned off? Would that mean the sound never happened? If a tree falls in the woods? LOL This is what you ask of the conspiracy theorist no? Well let's see you prove your own theory. No dodging.

I think you will find if you read more carefully that people are talking specifically about DEMOLITION CHARGES, which are a type of EXTREMELY LOUD explosives. No one is denying that things in office buildings explode in fires, we are pointing out to you that those explosions are not big enough to do the work of demolition charges.

Are you trying to suggest that there is some way of cutting through massive steel collumns with an exploding transformer or a closet full of cleaning products?

It's my claim if there were explosions they wouldn't necessarily have been picked up remember? Are you arguing my point now? Did I turn you around? LOL

And it is the rational point that if they weren't loud enough to be picked up, they wouldn't be big enough to destroy structural steel elements in the WTC.

No need to wait you've been debunked. Gee it's gotten awfully quiet in here. Is everyone’s mic on? LOL

So you think you are winning this discussion? Maybe we could take a poll on it...

 

[DGM]

I am and the fact that none of you can support your own argument on your own terms. It is the claim of the debunker if there were explosive sounds at ground zero it would have been picked up by all of the many recording devices documenting the event. So where are the many recordings of these known explosive sounds I have provided? Were these sounds only caught by one microphone? What if that microphone had been turned off? Would that mean the sound never happened? If a tree falls in the woods? LOL This is what you ask of the conspiracy theorist no? Well let's see you prove your own theory. No dodging.



It's my claim if there were explosions they wouldn't necessarily have been picked up remember? Are you arguing my point now? Did I turn you around? LOL



No need to wait you've been debunked. Gee it's gotten awfully quiet in here. Is everyone’s mic on? LOL

The first two videos are the same event. There you go it's proved that more than one would pick it up. Now show that they were not. This of course has nothing to do with the collapses because they were already over.

 

[WildCat]

Oh nice try. But you fail too. Unless you have some kind of proof its fake

You don't even know the source of the video, you don't know the time or place it was made. Odd nobody reacts to the "explosion", isn't it?

And you expect it to prove something?

 

[LastChild]

still waiting for that video example of a silent CD lost child. are you having a problem finding one?

It wouldn't have to be silent it would just need to be recorded lower then the sound of a collapsing Skyscraperg. I proved that to you already remember? Now it's your turn to meet your own standard. Maybe you should just stay out of it though. Facts have never been your strong point.

Oh yeah this post of yours as far as the debunker standard goe? It fails. Again.

 

[LastChild]

You don't even know the source of the video, you don't know the time or place it was made. Odd nobody reacts to the "explosion", isn't it?

They don't react? LOL yeah ok. FAIL!

And you expect it to prove something?

Not unless Gravy's piece of crap movie proves something.

 

[LastChild]

At what time was the video taken?

On 9/11

 

[A W Smith]

It wouldn't have to be silent it would just need to be recorded lower then the sound of a collapsing Skyscraperg. I proved that to you already remember? Now it's your turn to meet your own standard. Maybe you should just stay out of it though. Facts have never been your strong point.

Oh yeah this post of yours as far as the debunker standard goe? It fails. Again.

You showed no example of a skyscraperg CD quieter than the skyscraperg collapsing. Is this as far as the troofer standard goe?

 

[Brainache]

It seems to me that our young friend here has gotten into quite a state over Mark Roberts' excellent video "WTC not a demolition". He is going round and round in circles spitting chips because he realises his pet fantasy has been destroyed. He can't move forward with his stupid world view until he debunks the video and he is totally incapable of debunking Mark's work. I like to call this state: "One foot in the Gravy".