• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Rosetta Stone of 9/11

I would say that the possibility of deliberate obstruction of an investigation, specifically that of the 9/11 commission, by the CIA (or members within) requires further investigation.

TAM:)
 
Last edited:
HH is correct. The events of 9/11 were a conspiracy. A conspiracy by a small group of religious fanatics who took advantage of US complacency to successfully hijack four airplanes and fly three of them into buildings.

We can all go home now. Show's over, folks.
 
HereticHulk said:
Where did I say that?
Click to expand...

HereticHulk said:
The fact that we are hearing about this at all kind of proves thewhole"Evil Gubmint Conspiracy" thing.

There, I fixed your comment for ya to reflect the truth!
Click to expand...

I know it gets hard trying to keep up with all of your snide remarks due to your lashing out in futility at the fact that your chosen "rebel" movement is on the skids and your "truth" is constantly getting crushed due things like facts but please, try to keep up.

<waits for the dancing>
 
T.A.M. said:
I would say that the possibility of deliberate obstruction of an investigation, specifically that of the 9/11 commission, by the CIA (or members within) requires further investigation.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

bold is the essence of why your statement is meaningless to me.
Hulk:)
 
How does the destruction of the tapes fit into your version of the events on 9/11, Hulk?
 
jhunter1163 said:
HH is correct. The events of 9/11 were a conspiracy. A conspiracy by a small group of religious fanatics who took advantage of US complacency to successfully hijack four airplanes and fly three of them into buildings.

We can all go home now. Show's over, folks.
Click to expand...

Indeed! More than likely 'conspiring' christian fanatics who took advantage of US complacency to successfully hijack four airplanes and fly three of them into buildings.
 
TheRedWorm said:
How does the destruction of the tapes fit into your version of the events on 9/11, Hulk?
Click to expand...


This makes a whole lotta sense man. Are you asking me to speculate on what information and who was implicated with the destroyed evidence. Just a shot in the dark, but maybe that's why they were destroyed?

:dl:
 
Redtail said:
I know it gets hard trying to keep up with all of your snide remarks due to your lashing out in futility at the fact that your chosen "rebel" movement is on the skids and your "truth" is constantly getting crushed due things like facts but please, try to keep up.

<waits for the dancing>
Click to expand...

:i:
 
Yes, but what does this have to do with 9/11? I'm asking you why you are linking these two events. I did not ask you to speculate what was on the tapes.
 
I didn't say who should I ask, I asked what does one has to do with the other. If you can't answer, at least admit that you were mistaken in saying that this is the "Rosetta Stone of 9/11"
 
http://balkin.blogspot.com/2007/12/impeccable-timing.html

If the CIA had destroyed its interrogation tapes during the pendency of the 9/11 Commission investigation, that almost surely would have constituted felony violations of 18 U.S.C. 1512(c)(1). So they retained the tapes during that investigation. However, as the New York Times reports tomorrow, the CIA very carefully avoided informing the 9/11 Commission of the existence of the interrogation tapes -- which would have been extremely valuable information for the Commission to use. "A C.I.A. spokesman said that the agency had been prepared to give the Sept. 11 commission the interrogation videotapes" . . . but the Commission never said the magic words!: The Commission sought "documents," "reports" and "information" related to the interrogations from the CIA -- but "staff members never specifically asked for interrogation videos."

[snip]

Here's the really amazing bit, however: "Because it was thought the commission could ask about the tapes at some point, they were not destroyed while the commission was active," said a CIA spokesperson.

Then, as soon as the Commission issued its report and closed up shop, the CIA quickly destroyed the evidence, precisely because there was no longer any proceeding pending (and arguably no foreseeable proceeding that would trigger 1512(c)(1) culpability, although that is far from certain).
Click to expand...

Yes, nothing to see here! Move along! Your government is in control...move along!
 
HereticHulk said:
Are you serious?:confused:

con·spir·a·cy

1. the act of conspiring.
2. an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.
3. a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose: He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.
4. Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.
5. any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.
Click to expand...


On September 11, 2001, nineteen well-trained, highly motivated jihadists hijacked four planes and flew three of them into buildings. A mountain of evidence supports this contention.

The CIA is currently accused of destroying tapes (that it was not required to produce) that might show harsh treatment of al-Qaeda operatives.

You are attempting to suggest a connection between these two reality-based statements and the farrago of distorted quotes, absurdly bogus science, and the blizzard of outright lies that comprise the 9/11 fantasy movement.

What possible connection can there be? The al-Qaeda operatives who may or may not have been tortured by the CIA are real. Your mathematically-impossible conspiracy is imaginary.
 
That still does not answer my question. How does the destruction prove to be the "Rosetta Stone of 9/11"
 
Reality Believer said:
Yes, this in itself is a legitimate conspiracy. Congratulations, you found one.
Click to expand...

Thank you man!

Now like I said before, if there is no 9/11 cover-up what are they covering up re: 9/11 and these tapes.

What other evidence has been covered up and/or destroyed in and around the events of 9/11?

When are you people at JREF gonna start helping to get to some kind of truth and accountably re: 9/11.

So much time is wasted (here) refuted claims that are most likely cointellpro anyways.
 
pomeroo said:
On September 11, 2001, nineteen well-trained, highly motivated jihadists hijacked four planes and flew three of them into buildings. A mountain of evidence supports this contention.

The CIA is currently accused of destroying tapes (that it was not required to produce) that might show harsh treatment of al-Qaeda operatives.

You are attempting to suggest a connection between these two reality-based statements and the farrago of distorted quotes, absurdly bogus science, and the blizzard of outright lies that comprise the 9/11 fantasy movement.

What possible connection can there be? The al-Qaeda operatives who may or may not have been tortured by the CIA are real. Your mathematically-impossible conspiracy is imaginary.
Click to expand...

You are so gullible! :bwall
 
So, your argument is that if "the government" destroyed evidence (these tapes) then they carried out 9/11 (or at least let it happen)? Doesn't the fact that the destruction of these tapes was brought to light kind of invalidate the opinion that the Government is able to keep secrets?
 
HereticHulk said:
Thank you man!

Now like I said before, if there is no 9/11 cover-up what are they covering up re: 9/11 and these tapes.

What other evidence has been covered up and/or destroyed in and around the events of 9/11?

When are you people at JREF gonna start helping to get to some kind of truth and accountably re: 9/11.

So much time is wasted (here) refuted claims that are most likely cointellpro anyways.
Click to expand...


We all get the idea that the CIA is covering up behavior that will inspire its critics to keep screaming about "torture."
There is no 9/11 cover-up because the perpetrators are known. Here's a hint: they keep crowing about their victory.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom