• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Rosetta Stone of 9/11

T.A.M. said:
truther definition of "cointelpro":

"Any theory or take on things that does not catch on, or is disproven."

TAM:)
Click to expand...

Truth Duh-niler:

"I will not question authority, or connect the dots because it is not peer reviewed by a paid governed body of 'experts'."

Hulk:)
 
Max Photon said:
The story that the CIA destroyed interrogation tapes is a ruse.

This yummy little mind-snack serves as a dynamo that helps power the Al-Qaeda illusion. (The Sibel Edmonds story is another little engine that could.)

The CIA story naturally conjures in our minds horrible imagery of torture. The assumptive close hidden in this imagined torture is that there really must exist a terrible enemy indeed, if we must stoop to such heinous activities just to protect ourselves.

In other words, the story of the destroyed tapes has in it the assumptive close that Al-Qaeda even exists.
Click to expand...

Swing and a miss.
 
Funny, this Rosetta Stone seems to be backwards, after the fact

Is this OP about why 9/11 was an inside job because someone sold the CIA torture tapes to a movie produce? Who is dumb enough to use this event as backwards proof 9/11 was an inside job. Who is dumb enough?

At least the news article is not bat nut crazy 9/11 truth BS junk how this is a missing link for 9/11 inside job junk. No smoking gun for 9/11 truth here, just a political witch hunt for torture claims. This OP is really political forum tripe, not CT tripe.
 
Last edited:
Jonnyclueless said:
My guess is that the techniques used were not pretty and they didn't want to make it known since it wasn't relevant to the investigation. Also the two suspects in question were low level guys who had some knowledge of Al Qeada's workings, not guys ho were involved in 9/11.
Click to expand...

The methods were probably, in and of themselves, war crimes. It is relevant to the reliability of the evidence obtained. Roll it up and hang it on the latrine wall next to the throne..

That's not to say there isn't possibly some kind of wrong doing here, but it can easily get twisted.
Click to expand...

All the knowledge of the exact nature of the interogation methods could prove is that the administration acted in a despicable manner after the attacks. That Rummy and Cheney pressured intel agents who should have known better to use barbaric and invalid interrogation methods, however, does not disprove that Osama is a mass murderer. The evidence obtained, being tainted, is just not really admissible in court.
 
eromitlab said:
When you've got nothing to prove 9/11 was orchestrated by the US government...

Ready

set

Change the subject and hope no one notices!
Click to expand...

Who is changing the subject here?

Tell me where in this thread I said the US Government orchestrated 9/11?

OP Summary:

The CIA destroying evidence that otherwise should have been involved in the 9/11 commission investigation. This is a conspiracy and subsequent cover-up that has to do with the events, perpetrators and players of 9/11.

BTW, we're talking rat-bastards here, not science. Start an appropriate investigation into the rat-bastards and then we can apply all of the science in the world to help develop well-informed conclusions.

What you duh-nilers seem to forget is that the passage of time is a criminal's best friend. And that's a more important fundamental tenant of empirical thinking and the scientific method.

I'm interested in reaching as much truth about this matter as is possible. For the CIA to destroy the tapes, in a bid to hide something, it cannot be that the Al-Qaeda ops we're denying there role in 911. It also cannot be that they admitted to doing it. Both of these situations would be expected and have no controversy. The most likely reason these tapes would be destroyed would be to hide who helped them execute the plot. The whole world outside of America knows that we torture folks. So this couldn't be the issue with these tapes either.

Whether it be a foreign country that the administration does not want to strain relations or "GASP" our own government itself.
 
Last edited:
HereticHulk said:
Who is changing the subject here?
Click to expand...
You are. You're asked to prove 9/11 was orchestrated by the US government, and you reply instead asking the poster to prove that God exists. Nothing more than a dodge. And by the end of the post... you're implying that 9/11 at least could have been orchestrated by the US government.
 
HereticHulk said:
OP Summary:
The CIA destroying evidence that otherwise should have been involved in the 9/11 commission investigation. This is a conspiracy and subsequent cover-up that has to do with the events, perpetrators and players of 9/11.

BTW, we're talking rat-bastards here, not science. Start an appropriate investigation into the rat-bastards and then we can apply all of the science in the world to help develop well-informed conclusions.

What you duh-nilers seem to forget is that the passage of time is a criminal's best friend. And that's a more important fundamental tenant of empirical thinking and the scientific method.

I'm interested in reaching as much truth about this matter as is possible. For the CIA to destroy the tapes, in a bid to hide something, it cannot be that the Al-Qaeda ops we're denying there role in 911. It also cannot be that they admitted to doing it. Both of these situations would be expected and have no controversy. The most likely reason these tapes would be destroyed would be to hide who helped them execute the plot. The whole world outside of America knows that we torture folks. So this couldn't be the issue with these tapes either.

Whether it be a foreign country that the administration does not want to strain relations or "GASP" our own government itself.
Click to expand...
How can you get so much wrong in one post? You need to revise your OP and make clear what you mean and stop being so obtuse.
 
HereticHulk said:
Tell me where in this thread I said the US Government orchestrated 9/11?
Click to expand...
In one of the tags, Hulk. It clearly identifies this thread as being about an "inside job".

"Inside job" refers to the idea that the USG orchestrated or facilitated 9/11, doesn't it? If you have another definition of "inside job", please provide it.
 
Keep it on topic, and civil here please. Several posts moved to AAH.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom