You do not have any facts; 77 did hit the Pentagon. And unless you have been brain dead for 6 years you know the passengers on flight 77 figured out 9/11 in a few minutes and stopped the terrorist. Your lack of facts is pathetic and disrespectful.
Can you give an example of one of these questions?
It would be of great help in understanding where you are coming from, with respect to your believes on the 9/11 attacks, if you could provide why you believe the elements of the attacks you mention above were staged, what evidence convinced you, etc...
Welcome to the forum.
TAM
I think he meant 93. I was giving him a chance to edit it before I brought it up.
What quality of books? What were their sources? Were they written by experts in the fields they were discussing or did they consult experts? Have you only read ones that support one side?
As before: What quality of documentaries? What were their sources? Were they written by experts in the fields they were discussing or did they consult experts? Have you only seen ones that support one side?
Were they missing or did they just not perform up to the standard set in the movies?
Did it just fall?
"i thought"
It is. You have failed to study 9/11 and you do not know what happen to flight 93?
beachnut is kind of the "bad cop" from the "good cop - bad cop" scenario. He is a good person who means well, but I think he has no problem telling you what he feels. We have been led down the garden path many times by people claiming to be "just asking questions", only to later reveal they have already made up their minds on all the issues...
TAM
Well this is a good approach, and if you can stick to this, you will pick up a lot of information on the subjects of 9/11 from this forum. Ultimately you have to decide, based on the validity of the evidence, the arguments made, where you stand, and some of that may come from your world view. I would hope you could put your world view aside, and simply rely on the facts and evidence.
Good luck with your inquiry.
TAM
Why is it hard to believe that a small group of men, some of whom with flight training, could buy airline tickets? "[E]asily and precisely" yet missed on a quarter of the targets.
According to the designers (however the calculations they used are lost) the towers were designed to survive the impact of a 707 at cruising speed not top speed. This is not to say that a 707 would bounce off the side, but the structure would not immediately collapse as a result (it would hold long enough for repairs). It was believed that a jet may accidently crash into the WTC if it was lost in the fog or night, as in the case of the bomber crashing into the ESB. It would theoretically be going slow and be low on fuel.
