• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Bigfoot - The Patterson-Gimlin Film

Status
Not open for further replies.
Diogenes said:
Apparently you don't know the difference between ' hanging low ' and ' attached low ' ..


However, since we don't have a Bigfoot body, you are always safe with :

" Whose to say Bigfoot breasts aren't attached low, compared to other primates ? ... " Oh, and " off-center " while you're at it ..

Oh, and the left one bounces but the right one doesn't ...


Oh, oh, oh, oh ......Etc....
Click to expand...

You seem to have forgotten your Cub Scout oath, IN A BIG WAY, if you get my drift.
 
Its time for female primate boob fest!
YEAH!
orangutang.jpg

gorilla-1.jpg

ffoto.jpg


Note they are lactant females.
Note that none of them have breasts similar to Patty's.
Why?
Perhaps because Patty's breasts are a fakery?

The "unknown species" argument is pretty much useless, as already pointed many times before.

BTW, I fail to see at PGF anything like those baby apes. Oh, no faces in the fur, also.
 
SweatyYeti said:
historian wrote:


You couldn't have stated it any better, historian!

I've said essentially the same thing about the "skeptical" thinking that exists on this forum....by calling it a 'sewer' of a discussion board.

The skeptical "analysis" of the evidence that goes on here is not critical analysis...it's wishful thinking analysis.

A great example of this is Correa's post with the images of Gorilla suits.

After reading it, I thought of the phrase...(inspired by the Christmas season)....."The Little Dreamer Boy"....to describe Correa. His comparison of the suits with Patty's hide is pure wishful thinking. I'll demonstrate why it is, sometime later today.
Click to expand...
Here you will find some examples of what wishfull thinking actually is:
-A human head will not fit inside Patty's head;
-Patty's fingers move, then Patty is a bigfoot;
-People will buy the "I'll demonstrate later" line;
I could go on, but that's enough sewage. Yes, there's much more from where these samples came from.

SY, a bigfoot enthusiast once said that given your... Substandard performance... You should drop bigfoot investigation and start investigating chupacabras. Its time for you to consider her advise. Unless, of course, you don't mind being an embarrassment for your cause.
 
Last edited:
Apparently you don't know the difference between ' hanging low ' and ' attached low ' ..
Click to expand...

This is basically what my reply would have been had you not beat me to it.

Correa, do 'they' say the saw 'faces' in the fur or 'feces'?
 
You are welcome, but I'm not sure if Beckjord, besides seeing the faces also "sees" dangling feces...

Oh, closest match to Patty I ever managed to find while googling for ape images:
7.jpg
 
Last edited:
RayG:
The wirstband is near the donut-shaped muscles, between the dangling poo, the baby and the faces in the fur, a bit above the body cavities!

cloudshipsrule:
Its because they are "invisiable" bigfeet!

Now, honestly, I have no idea. They are showing here (maybe because they are on the cash memory?) seem to be OK at Photobucket, also...
 
Diogenes said:
You will never find a real animal that has the patchwork of hair, pointing in all directions, that Patty has..
Click to expand...

I have falsified your hypotheses, and my cat, shortly after I ruffled all his hairs in various direction, and shortly before he scratched my arms and face to the blood, certainly had patchwork of hair pointing in all direction.

I add the following addenda to your hypotheses : You will never find a wilde animal that has the patchwork of hair, pointing in all directions, that Patty has...
 
Correa Neto said:
Its time for female primate boob fest!
YEAH!

Note they are lactant females.
Note that none of them have breasts similar to Patty's.
Why?
Perhaps because Patty's breasts are a fakery?
Click to expand...

Or, (now this is pretty obvious) perhaps Paddy is not more closely related to apes than she is to a human female, as per recent DNA studies. And Paddy BTW, is not overly nor underly perky. She would be an inspiration to any human female over the age of 50.

And perhaps Correa Neto, sees only fake breasts because he has been watching far too many X-rated skin flicks. Or he is simply living in denial. Take your choice. Either way, does not bode well for the Correanator.
 
Last edited:
Living in Brazil, I doubt he has a problem finding babes to make 'scientific' comparisons of bodily features.
 
historian said:
Or, (now this is pretty obvious) perhaps Paddy is not more closely related to apes than she is to a human female, as per recent DNA studies.
Click to expand...
Would you mind showing us these "recent DNA studies"?
I honestly hope you are not talking about those assays where contamination was shown to be an issue...

historian said:
And Paddy BTW, is not overly nor underly perky. She would be an inspiration to any human female over the age of 50.
Click to expand...
So, you are saying that Patty is comparable to a 50 years old human female?
Based on what sort of evidence? Why?
The bigfeet voices in your head told you so?

historian said:
And perhaps Correa Neto, sees only fake breasts because he has been watching far too many X-rated skin flicks. Or his is simply living in denial. Take your choice. Either way, does not bode well for the Correanator.
Click to expand...
Regardless of being young or mature, lactant or not, small, medium or large, Patty's boobs do not move like the breasts of real human females do. In humans, the closest thing to Patty's boobs you'll see would be some old and/or exaggerated implants.

I'm sorry if you don't have enough real-life experience with females from our species to understand how unatural Patty's breasts are.

Patty's breasts do not look like the breasts from female humans, bonobos, chimps, gorillas and orang-utangs. They look, however, like rigid implants.

You may also now want to take your foot out of your mouth.:footinmou
Well, probably you are already used to it...

So says the "Correanator".
 
Drewbot said:
Living in Brazil, I doubt he has a problem finding babes to make 'scientific' comparisons of bodily features.
Click to expand...
Quite often I try to explain my wife I need a greater sample ammount as well as more detailed and repeated observations/experimentation in order to run the propper statistics.

You know, standard deviation, chi-square, regression, variance, etc. I need to run a propper Kriging!:pedant:teacher:

For some reason she does not seem to realize the importance of a good sampling!:bricks:
 
Just tell her that you can not vouch for any results, unless the sample size is of a statistically significant size. Therefore in the name of science you must carry on.

God speed young man...
 
Last edited:
Already told her...

Can't write what she told me to do with the sample size... Rule 8 stuff! She just can't understand the sacrifices I am willing to make in the name of science!

"But I'm just a soul whose intentions are good
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"

And god speed, yes, I needed a lot of speed!
 
Harry very wary

I don't have anything to add to the discussion, I just wanted to be part of the thread that ate New York.

Oh wait, I do have something. Bigfoot fantasizers say he's extemely shy--or very wary--of big, bad homo sapiens, and will run and hide at the first sight or sound of him. That's why they're so hard to find, you know. Yet the sasquatchette in Patterson's clip just walks away with a heavy, deliberate gait, despite being fully aware of the two threatening men close by.

I'm going to take the gamble of my life and declare: it's a hoax.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom