Sporanox
Muse
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2007
- Messages
- 899
Even going by the official theory there is inconsistency.
Let's put it this way, kageki. Osama said he did it after he said he didn't. Also, he repeated that he did it quite a few times.
Even going by the official theory there is inconsistency.
I thought Jews weren't a race?
<snip>
I'm not sure if this link will connect but the article can be found here:
www.lawrencewright.com/wrightNewJihadis.pdf
Well, you've got my vote on that. Olmert is not a very well supported man right now. But I'm pretty sure that wasn't your insinuation in its entirety.
Ah well. We agree on something.
Bully for you. We have the freedom to think that stuff up even though it's totally untrue. Why invade Iraq and Afghanistan? Where's the profit? Don't just throw out the oil pipe canard you were giving another board member earlier.
-Sporanox
Let's put it this way, kageki. Osama said he did it after he said he didn't. Also, he repeated that he did it quite a few times.
You're right. So that makes you an anti-semite, not a racist.
And since Japanese is also not a race, but a nationality, that means your entire rant on Darth being a racist, is... well, like so many other of your rants, a total crock.
Ohhhhh, but thanks for playing. We have some lovely parting gifts. Tell 'em about it, Don Pardo!
Do you always hoist yourself on your own petard? (Foolish question - the answer is too obvious.)
So, do you intend to ever address the OP to this thread? Is Osama to be believed only when your personal credulity/incredulity meter says so? Could you give us the clues we're to look for when he's lying vs. telling the truth? And what do you think this will do to your moribund Truth Movement? (Or do you care about the moribund Truth Movement, or merely see it as a convenient outlet for your revisionist history?)
Well you must be kidding yourself if you don't think oil plays a big role.
Why would he deny it even? Don't you find it strange? There's no consistency.
pe·tard /pɪˈtɑrd/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[pi-tahrd] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. an explosive device formerly used in warfare to blow in a door or gate, form a breach in a wall, etc.
2. a kind of firecracker.
3. (initial capital letter) Also called Flying Dustbin. a British spigot mortar of World War II that fired a 40-pound (18 kg) finned bomb, designed to destroy pillboxes and other concrete obstacles.
—Idiom
4. hoist by or with one's own petard, hurt, ruined, or destroyed by the very device or plot one had intended for another.
What's a petard. I can't keep up with the idiot dictionary.
Yes you should always be questioning everything. You know being skeptical?
Who cares about this "truth movement". People have always researched conspiracies.
Why would he deny it even? Don't you find it strange? There's no consistency.
Ah, thanks for covering that one TAM.![]()
Anyway...
You questioned the story, for no reason. We questioned you. You failed at answering.
Yes, people have always researched conspiracies. In fact, we do that all the time. And guess what we find from the research?
-Sporanox
They can make up evidence though.
I mean you still believe Oswald shot JFK right?![]()
He would deny it to prevent the U.S. from overthrowing the Taliban.
Duh!
The evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK and acted alone is overwhelming. Over the past forty-four years, absolutely nothing has emerged to challenge that conclusion.