• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Osama to Truthers: I Did It

Even going by the official theory there is inconsistency.

Let's put it this way, kageki. Osama said he did it after he said he didn't. Also, he repeated that he did it quite a few times.
 
I thought Jews weren't a race?
<snip>

You're right. So that makes you an anti-semite, not a racist.

And since Japanese is also not a race, but a nationality, that means your entire rant on Darth being a racist, is... well, like so many other of your rants, a total crock.

Ohhhhh, but thanks for playing. We have some lovely parting gifts. Tell 'em about it, Don Pardo!



Do you always hoist yourself on your own petard? (Foolish question - the answer is too obvious.)


So, do you intend to ever address the OP to this thread? Is Osama to be believed only when your personal credulity/incredulity meter says so? Could you give us the clues we're to look for when he's lying vs. telling the truth? And what do you think this will do to your moribund Truth Movement? (Or do you care about the moribund Truth Movement, or merely see it as a convenient outlet for your revisionist history?)
 
Please tone this down and keep the thread civil and on track. I'm seeing multiple violations, including derailment and name-calling. If this continues, there is a possibility of a moderated thread or banishment to the dreaded AAH forum.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LibraryLady
 
Well, you've got my vote on that. Olmert is not a very well supported man right now. But I'm pretty sure that wasn't your insinuation in its entirety.

Ah well. We agree on something.



Bully for you. We have the freedom to think that stuff up even though it's totally untrue. Why invade Iraq and Afghanistan? Where's the profit? Don't just throw out the oil pipe canard you were giving another board member earlier.

-Sporanox

Well you must be kidding yourself if you don't think oil plays a big role. It's for many reasons, but for Iraq it was about security of Israel amongst other reasons. It never made sense for the US to invade Iraq.
 
Let's put it this way, kageki. Osama said he did it after he said he didn't. Also, he repeated that he did it quite a few times.

Why would he deny it even? Don't you find it strange? There's no consistency.
 
You're right. So that makes you an anti-semite, not a racist.

And since Japanese is also not a race, but a nationality, that means your entire rant on Darth being a racist, is... well, like so many other of your rants, a total crock.

Ohhhhh, but thanks for playing. We have some lovely parting gifts. Tell 'em about it, Don Pardo!



Do you always hoist yourself on your own petard? (Foolish question - the answer is too obvious.)


So, do you intend to ever address the OP to this thread? Is Osama to be believed only when your personal credulity/incredulity meter says so? Could you give us the clues we're to look for when he's lying vs. telling the truth? And what do you think this will do to your moribund Truth Movement? (Or do you care about the moribund Truth Movement, or merely see it as a convenient outlet for your revisionist history?)

Well I would debate about Japan, but whatever.

What's a petard. I can't keep up with the idiot dictionary.

I was just merely pointing out that he denied it at first and ever since then there hasn't been a mix up. Yes you should always be questioning everything. You know being skeptical?

Who cares about this "truth movement". People have always researched conspiracies.
 
I believe Osama addressed this, off the record, with some journalist/author (the name escapes me....anyone), where he stated that he had initially denied being responsible purposefully, because this is what Israel always does (so he claims) when accused of something, and he wanted to do the same to one of Israel's allies.

Anyone have a link to this??


TAM:)
 
Well you must be kidding yourself if you don't think oil plays a big role.

But why? Where is your evidence that oil plays a big role? Iraqis are free to make deals with whoever they choose in today's world. In fact, that was the cause of a lot of political squabbling a few months ago when the Kurds broke off and started making private deals on their own.

Besides, I'm pretty sure that the amount of treasure that we've invested in Iraq up till now is considerably more than any oil profit we might get from it for some time. I could go further, but that's enough to chew on so far.

Why would he deny it even? Don't you find it strange? There's no consistency.

Except for his announcement in the days following September 11th that he didn't initiate the attacks but was "happy" they occurred, he's been pretty consistent.

-Sporanox
 
pe·tard /pɪˈtɑrd/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[pi-tahrd] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. an explosive device formerly used in warfare to blow in a door or gate, form a breach in a wall, etc.
2. a kind of firecracker.
3. (initial capital letter) Also called Flying Dustbin. a British spigot mortar of World War II that fired a 40-pound (18 kg) finned bomb, designed to destroy pillboxes and other concrete obstacles.
—Idiom
4. hoist by or with one's own petard, hurt, ruined, or destroyed by the very device or plot one had intended for another.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/petard

TAM:)
 
What's a petard. I can't keep up with the idiot dictionary.

Don't you think it would be smart to look up a new word to you in a dictionary before saying someone is an idiot for using it?
 
Ah, thanks for covering that one TAM. :)

Anyway...

Yes you should always be questioning everything. You know being skeptical?

Who cares about this "truth movement". People have always researched conspiracies.

You questioned the story, for no reason. We questioned you. You failed at answering.

Yes, people have always researched conspiracies. In fact, we do that all the time. And guess what we find from the research?

-Sporanox
 
Ah, thanks for covering that one TAM. :)

Anyway...



You questioned the story, for no reason. We questioned you. You failed at answering.

Yes, people have always researched conspiracies. In fact, we do that all the time. And guess what we find from the research?

-Sporanox

I questioned why he was not charged for 9/11 to which I have not received an adequate response.
 
They can make up evidence though.

I mean you still believe Oswald shot JFK right? :rolleyes:


The evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK and acted alone is overwhelming. Over the past forty-four years, absolutely nothing has emerged to challenge that conclusion.
 
So. OBL has freedom to move as he wishes in Afghanistan, hold training camps, whatever. His hosts? The Taliban.

Can any rational person figure out why he may at first be hesitant to do anything that may imperil the Taliban? As we all know, Arabs don't value the concept of hosts at all, do they? LOL

Frankly, I think one would have to be an idiot to find something suspicious about OBL's comments immediately following 911. Exactly what else should he have said?
 
He would deny it to prevent the U.S. from overthrowing the Taliban.

Duh!

The thing is I don't think OBL is stupid enough to actually even do something like 9/11 in the first place that would guarantee the wraith of the US military. Embassy bombings and 9/11 just doesn't compare.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom