Osama to Truthers: I Did It

[defaultdotxbe]

I have. He believed exactly what the government laid out. That Saddam was harboring terrorists etc.

harboring terrorists (or paying the families of suicide bombers) doesnt automatically mean 9/11, does this person believe saddam has a connection to 9/11 specifically, or just a connection to terrorism in general? (not saying he doesnt think saddam is connected to 9/11, i just want clarification)

 

[Foolmewunz]

You know doing something like that is illegal or that there is no such thing as Bolshevik Zionists?

Enlighten me, please! I'm just this crusty old Jew sitting in Hong Kong and dying to know why there are Zionist Bolsheviks and not Bolshevik Zionists. As to torching a Synagogue... Hey, why not? Bring your real desires to the forefront, I say! --- Why play around on the internet with words? Let's get out there and set fire to a few things! I'm sure a few of my buds in the JDL would love to meet with you and discuss it. Or are you just a chicken**** internet troll?

Are you Rea?

 

[defaultdotxbe]

there is no such thing as Bolshevik Zionists?

while the two groups are unrelated they dont seem to be mutually exclusive, is there some reason there cant be a bolshevik zionist (or zionist bolshevik)

 

[MikeW]

If anyone needs it, the full video is now on this page (bottom of the list, "bin Laden, November 2007").

 

[kageki]

Enlighten me, please! I'm just this crusty old Jew sitting in Hong Kong and dying to know why there are Zionis Bolsheviks and not Bolshevik Zionists. As to torching a Synagogue... Hey, why not? Bring your real desires to the forefront, I say! --- Why play around on the internet with words? Let's get out there and set fire to a few things! I'm sure a few of my buds in the JDL would love to meet with you and discuss it. Or are you just a chicken**** internet troll?

Are you Rea?

You can start by looking up the meaning of Bolsheviks and Zionists.

What's wrong with you? Or are you one of those Jews that like to do that and blame it on other people like this girl?

http://video.nbc4.com/player/?id=179503

Do you know who the JDL is?

http://www.rickross.com/groups/jewish_defense.html

I am not a violent person. You seem different though.

 

[kageki]

harboring terrorists (or paying the families of suicide bombers) doesnt automatically mean 9/11, does this person believe saddam has a connection to 9/11 specifically, or just a connection to terrorism in general? (not saying he doesnt think saddam is connected to 9/11, i just want clarification)

I think he did believe there was a connection to 9/11, but it's been awhile I talked to him.

 

[kageki]

while the two groups are unrelated they dont seem to be mutually exclusive, is there some reason there cant be a bolshevik zionist (or zionist bolshevik)

I just never heard of it. This is derailing the thread.

 

[1337m4n]

There is probably legal reasons for why they can't officially list 9/11 on there.

In which case, there is nothing suspicious or questionable about the fact that 9/11 doesn't appear on his Wanted image.




I believe this is what is referred to in chess as "checkmate". You are now forced to admit one of two things, both of which are bad news for the Truth Movement.

 

[kageki]

In which case, there is nothing suspicious or questionable about the fact that 9/11 doesn't appear on his Wanted image.




I believe this is what is referred to in chess as "checkmate". You are now forced to admit one of two things, both of which are bad news for the Truth Movement.

What is that? It's only a guess and I was implying there were no legal grounds on charging him for the crime. Why don't you tell me the reason then?

 

[Foolmewunz]

What is that? It's only a guess and I was implying there were no legal grounds on charging him for the crime. Why don't you tell me the reason then?

Several people have told you the reason, Sparky! You just refuse to listen.

 

[kageki]

Having looked at the FBI's "facts" page, it appears that you can't be "wanted for" a crime if you're merely the most famous suspected co-conspirator, you have to have been charged with it.

Exactly. He's only a suspect who has not been charged.

 

[kageki]

Several people have told you the reason, Sparky! You just refuse to listen.

Which is that he is not charged because there is no sufficient grounds to do so?

 

[Foolmewunz]

Exactly. He's only a suspect who has not been charged.

Semantics. Why do we call him a "terrorist". Maybe "fuzzybunny" would help rehabilitate his image?

 

[kageki]

Sept 11th was not regarded as a simple crime, but an act of war.
Therefore it is the US Army, not the FBI, which is after him over the 11/9/2001 (day / month / year format) attacks.

proof?

 

[kageki]

Semantics. Why do we call him a "terrorist". Maybe "fuzzybunny" would help rehabilitate his image?

What? Because he has been charged with prior acts of terrorism. We are talking specifically about 9/11 here. Try not to derail the topic.

 

[Darth Rotor]

Well it's basically played out as you describe. Osama is not wanted for 9/11 nor is he caught yet.

Your first part, in bold, is false, the second is true. (Hooray, you got something right. Glad to see it happen. )

Please go back and note that the original reward for him, from the Embassy Bombings, was 5 million bucks, which was raised to 25 million after the 9-11 attack.

Your reasoning remains abysmal. Your decisions to ignore simple information remains remarkable.

DR

 

[1337m4n]

What is that? It's only a guess and I was implying there were no legal grounds on charging him for the crime. Why don't you tell me the reason then?

You should be more clear with your meaning, lest people misinterpret you for a fool.

Several people have tried to explain to you the reason, so allow me to play the JAQ game here: Why can't THEY just fake some evidence that Osama did it? If you're with the Truth Movement, then you obviously must believe that the government has no problem faking evidence. And if you're not with the Truth Movement, you wouldn't be concerned with this subject in the way you are.

 

[kageki]

Your first part, in bold, is false, the second is true. (Hooray, you got something right. Glad to see it happen. )

Please go back and note that the original reward for him, from the Embassy Bombings, was 5 million bucks, which was raised to 25 million after the 9-11 attack.

Your reasoning remains abysmal. Your decisions to ignore simple information remains remarkable.

DR

They sometimes up the reward if they haven't caught someone in awhile. Doesn't mean anything. Why isn't the charge listed on the poster?

 

[kageki]

You should be more clear with your meaning, lest people misinterpret you for a fool.

Several people have tried to explain to you the reason, so allow me to play the JAQ game here: Why can't THEY just fake some evidence that Osama did it? If you're with the Truth Movement, then you obviously must believe that the government has no problem faking evidence. And if you're not with the Truth Movement, you wouldn't be concerned with this subject in the way you are.

Well those passports that allegedly belonged to the terrorists seem "fake". As in stolen identity. Or the Koran that was conspicuously placed in the hijacker's car or whatever. Perhaps those "confessions" are fake?

You are derailing this thread.

 

[Darth Rotor]

My female friend recently said to me, 'I know this is kind of wrong, but Bin Laden is really hot'.

Not sure about him, but his niece, Wafah Dofour, is pretty enough.

DR