• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The 9/11 Thread to End All 9/11 Threads

Chew on what? Moonbat guano? That kid is a walking Stundie award.
 
Last edited:
OMG I'm convinced:
The Pentagon, allegedly hit by Flight 77, is 77 feet tall. Ground broke on 9/11/1941

Aleister Crowley said that the most powerful occult ritual numbers are:
11, 77, 93 and 175
Click to expand...
I heard he was into 777, but not 77.
 
Last edited:
Dear lord, save me from the numerologists. I can take almost anything else but I don't think I can survive numerology.
 
Didn't we have someone here for a while who raved endlessly about Offutt AFB?

Do these loons ever do anything besides steal each others' material?
 
Ah-HAH! Indira Singh's and Mike Ruppert's own little Unified Fried Theory on PTech what did the Whole Thing on 9/11 rises again. I remember listening (painfully) to Singh's interview on this from some radio show called Guns N Butter. Seems like eons ago...
 
Hokulele said:
It was deliberate, considering the OP. Sorry, I should have put the sarcasm smiley at the end of that post. :o
Click to expand...

Just a funny quirk of mine. A friend who I first had an argument with about that phrase when i was very young. Afterward him and his Friends would use it repeatedly just to yank my chain and see me react. 38 years later im still reacting :)
 
Last edited:
"Whoever plotted 9/11 definitely viewed the FAA as the enemy that morning. Overriding FAA systems would be the most effective way to ensure the attacks were successful," FTW reported. "To do this, the FAA needed an evolution of PROMIS software installed on their systems and Ptech was just that; the White House and Secret Service had the same software on their systems – likely a superior modified version capable of 'surveillance and intervention' systems."

See folks it wasnt just "al Qaeda" front companies compromising government computers and systems on 9/11.
Click to expand...

Oh, oh oh, can I please have the stundie on that line? Please? Pretty please....with sugar (and thermite) on top?:dio:
 
We know it fails to be any usefulness on its own, but could it be "The 9/11 thread to end all 9/11 threads" for real? Please?
 
Every once in awhile, I follow up some links you find in these types of screeds, just to see how reliable the author is in representing what was said.

Near the beginning, he quotes this little gem:

SO...what does a PRO government, anti terrorism watchdog security group say about Ptech?

The worst-case scenario is that this is a situation where this was planned for a very long time to establish a company in this country and in the computer software business that would target federal agencies and gain access to key government data to essentially help terrorists launch another attack.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/200...08-secure01.htm
Click to expand...


Note he characterizes this as coming from a "PRO government, anti terrorism watchdog security group", so as to try and avoid criticism that he's using only CT sources. However, if you follow the link, you see the quote he uses come from a person being interviewed for the piece in question. As such, it cannot be assumed to be an accurate representation of the beliefs of the organization that produced the piece. In addition to this, the piece in question was not even produced by the "PRO government, anti terrorism watchdog security group", they are merely re-printing what looks like a transcript of a piece from NPR. See the bottom of the page for copyright info:

© Copyright 2002 National Public Radio (R)
Click to expand...

And the top of the page:

NPR Weekend All Things Considered December 8, 2002 (8:00 PM ET)
Click to expand...


So his "smoking gun quote" from a "PRO government, anti terrorism watchdog security group" is actually a third hand quote from someone completely different, who looks to just be speculating anyways. Not so much a smoking gun, as an old, rusty, unloaded gun that they don't even make bullets for anymore.

If he's so unreliable in reporting the source and nature of his "information", why would any reasonable person believe anything else he says? This was just one randomly selected reference, and it completely fails to be what he said it was. How many more such links could we find, if we could stomach the stupidity long enough to follow up on them?

Where's that "Epic Fail" picture?
 
Loss Leader said:
Dear lord, save me from the numerologists. I can take almost anything else but I don't think I can survive numerology.
Click to expand...

As Einstein once might have said, "To read the mind of God we must speak His language, and that is numerology."
 
The debunkers here can chew on this for awhile.
Click to expand...

I'll do what I always do in these situations when presented with hilariously inept Troofer nonsense:

lolz-you-fail.jpg
 
Who The **** is 8bitagent??? Should I give a S***?

TAM:)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom