Fake Ron Paul Currency seized

[snagswolf]

In no way does he add legitimacy to that group so just get that idea out of your head!

Sure he does. It's very clear he does by the way they talk about him on their website.

Do you think Alex jones/Twoofers are more legitimate now that Ron Paul was on The Alex Jones show?

Do you think anyone who believed 9/11 wasnt an inside job now believes it is because Ron Paul was on The Alex Jones show?

I think that anyone who's not familiar with the 9/11 conspiracies, and comes upon that website and sees that U.S. Congressman and presidential candidate Ron Paul is a frequent guest to the program, will certainly give more credence to what is claimed there.

All candidates should be bashed for appearing on the fox news network going by that logic! Everyone knows what they do and how terrible of a company they are. yet you arent bashing them for appearing on this monster of a network!

I know that in your little fantasy world, FOX News is equal to Alex Jones. But they're not. They're a legitimate news organization who happens to present the news from a conservative viewpoint.

I understand that your liberal viewpoint and limited scope forces you to put anything you disagree with in the same group, but that's not reality.

He went on the show of a supporter nothing more nothing less! He constantly states that he does not believe in those silly conspiracy theories, and most are just mad that twoofers are twisting Ron Pauls internet popularity into there favor because he did appear on the show.

I've seen video of Paul standing in front of a truther crowd, and when asked about 9/11, agreeing with them that there should be another 9/11 investigation.

He's pandering.

Are you not use to twoofers twisting anything they can to make them look legitimate?

Sure. But it is Ron Paul who is giving them the opportunity to use him to make them look legitimate.

If you and I can understand what the truthers do, why can't Ron Paul?

 

[corplinx]

In Ron Paul's america, currency will be left up to the states to decide along with abortion, voting rights, and crystal meth.

 

[OneShotKi11]

I understand that your liberal viewpoint and limited scope forces you to put anything you disagree with in the same group, but that's not reality.

I must say you are stupid based on that quote. YOu have no idea why i support Ron Paul nor do you know many of my views or political outlook!

As for needing a new 9/11 investigation i believe we do need one for the same reasons Ron Paul does. Not because of what the twoofers say happened that day or any conspiracy theory, but because of the many failures in our national security!
YOu see him (Ron Paul) say we need a new investigation and assume its for the same reasons twoofers call for one, but that is evidence of your own limited scope and inability to be truely critical.
While on the other hand i heard ROn Paul say we needed a new investigation and then researched his reasons why only to find out low and behold i agree with him.
Dont assume so much and one day you might be able to be as close minded as you claim my ideals are!

People like you only see whats in red and then pass judgment.

Ron Paul, Twoofers, Ron Paul, Twoofer, 9/11 Invesigation, Twoofer, Conspiracy theory....OMG Ron Paul is a nut run!!!!!

 

[Donal]

Isn't the federal government's power to print currency in the Constitution?

So, what are the Freepers whining about?

 

[snagswolf]

I must say you are stupid based on that quote. YOu have no idea why i support Ron Paul nor do you know many of my views or political outlook!

As for needing a new 9/11 investigation i believe we do need one for the same reasons Ron Paul does. Not because of what the twoofers say happened that day or any conspiracy theory, but because of the many failures in our national security!
YOu see him (Ron Paul) say we need a new investigation and assume its for the same reasons twoofers call for one, but that is evidence of your own limited scope and inability to be truely critical.
While on the other hand i heard ROn Paul say we needed a new investigation and then researched his reasons why only to find out low and behold i agree with him.
Dont assume so much and one day you might be able to be as close minded as you claim my ideals are!

People like you only see whats in red and then pass judgment.

Ron Paul, Twoofers, Ron Paul, Twoofer, 9/11 Invesigation, Twoofer, Conspiracy theory....OMG Ron Paul is a nut run!!!!!

Well, anyone who considers FOX News to be comparable to Alex Jones, is a close-minded liberal.

If Ron Paul would have answered that question the way you claim he believes, there wouldn't be a problem. If he would tell those nuts that he thinks 9/11 should be investigated, but not for the nutty reason they do, then he would be being honest.

But he didn't. He decided to pander to them. And he goes on Jones' show, knowing full well what Jones preaches, and never calls Jones on his lunacy. Sure, when he's away from that audience he'll deny that he believes what they do. It's called hypocrisy and pandering to your audience.

And I made no claim as to why you supported Ron Paul.

 

[OneShotKi11]

Well, anyone who considers FOX News to be comparable to Alex Jones, is a close-minded liberal.

If Ron Paul would have answered that question the way you claim he believes, there wouldn't be a problem. If he would tell those nuts that he thinks 9/11 should be investigated, but not for the nutty reason they do, then he would be being honest.

But he didn't. He decided to pander to them. And he goes on Jones' show, knowing full well what Jones preaches, and never calls Jones on his lunacy. Sure, when he's away from that audience he'll deny that he believes what they do. It's called hypocrisy and pandering to your audience.

And I made no claim as to why you supported Ron Paul.

Clearly your bias is acting up again!
For if im not mistaken you said that it would be ok for Ron Paul to say we need a new investigation ....
"If he would tell those nuts that he thinks 9/11 should be investigated, but not for the nutty reason they do, then he would be being honest."

YOu then state "but he didnt" without actually researching anything, again you just assumed.
I have seen ROn Paul multiply times tell them that he does not believe for the same reasons they do. Yet they continue to support him!!!

What people dont talk about is how many twoofers hate Ron Paul and talk about not voting for him because he doesnt believe 9/11 was an inside job. How come nobody talks about this??

YOu people just try and link him to as many negative things as possible, for what reasons i dont know. Lets talk about the hardcore twoofers who hate Ron Paul because he doesnt believe what they believe.

Has anyone actually seen who loosechange911.com advertises for as president? They actually have a banner for him up somewhere, but i can tell you this.....It isnt Ron Paul!

So please continue to state things without actually knowing the truth and then pretend them to be fact. Please continue to add 2+2 together and providing the answer as 4, yet still getting the answer marked wrong on the test because you didnt show how you came to that conclusion.

Please before you make your next post, think about what you are going to say and ask yourself....
DO i actually know if this is true?

Again please read around the red!!!!

 

[Cleon]

Well, anyone who considers FOX News to be comparable to Alex Jones, is a close-minded liberal.

You just accused a Ron Paul supporter of being a liberal.

Try not to let your knee jerk so hard...You might throw something out.

 

[Donal]

When any candidate gets softball questions tossed at him on any channel or program, they get skewered here and most other political discussion groups.

However, when the debate is being moderated and broadcasted by, say FOX News, you really can't rail on any one candidate unless they are being treated better than the opponents.

What Ron Paul does is go in for those sweetheart lovefests on the Alex Jones Show. Listen to the broadcasts. And there is no way Paul doesn't know what Jones preaches and stands for.

While Paul doesn't regurgitate their crap, he certainly has no problem accepting their support and money.

 

[rikzilla]

Linky:



I find it amusing that the Paul campaign seems to be attracting the real nutbars--the Twoofers, the neo-Nazis (Stormfront), now these bozos.

Look, Paul people, if you want people to accept Paul as a serious candidate--he's gotta distance himself from his base of supporters. 'Cause right now, his base of supporters make the Larouchites seem reasonable.

Damn Cleon!

I go away for a few months and I come back to find you have allowed the invasion of illegal Paulian aliens! OMG! Liberty Dollars!!!! I thought that particular form of idiocy was isolated to the Wyoming badlands of 1995. I never had an inkling Paul was so skilled that he could pull obscure and marginalized conspiracists out of an aparent time-warp. What's next? Will he announce David Koresh as his running mate?

I'm flabbergasted! But I'm also quite relieved! Oliver has become a Paulian! My powers of logical deduction have never before been quite so validated! I literally had that fine fellow pegged correctly long, long ago.

Oh look! Chris Hitchens is on CNN! His British monotone is unmistakeable.....geez...it looks as if Rick Sanchez will be forced to translate his mumblings!! I love that guy, his ability to annoy the religious by just being honest is...well...skeptic-gold!

-z

 

[ServiceSoon]

You just accused a Ron Paul supporter of being a liberal.

Duh, political positions are like a circle. When you get so far right you eventually get back on the grid as a left liberal.

In Ron Paul's america, currency will be left up to the states to decide along with abortion, voting rights, and crystal meth.

Wrong. But nice try. Congress is granted the power by the constitution to...coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin... Source: Article I - Section 8 of da US Constitution.

 

[Cleon]

Duh, political positions are like a circle. When you get so far right you eventually get back on the grid as a left liberal.

Duh, if you categorize a Ron Paul type as a liberal, you just reinforce the fact that the only thing "liberal" means to you is "someone who disagrees with me."

Because that's the only way such a categorization makes the least bit of sense. And even then, it's not much sense.

 

[Cleon]

Damn Cleon!

I go away for a few months and I come back to find you have allowed the invasion of illegal Paulian aliens! OMG! Liberty Dollars!!!! I thought that particular form of idiocy was isolated to the Wyoming badlands of 1995. I never had an inkling Paul was so skilled that he could pull obscure and marginalized conspiracists out of an aparent time-warp. What's next? Will he announce David Koresh as his running mate?

I think, technically, you have to be alive to be a candidate, but I could be wrong. My knowledge of the Constitution is not as strong as it used to be. Perhaps Mr. Badnarik can help me out...

Welcome back, rik.

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

Isn't the federal government's power to print currency in the Constitution?

Yes, but the right to cede that right to a private bank is not.

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

Will he announce David Koresh as his running mate?

Who do you support?

 

[UnrepentantSinner]

Yes, but the right to cede that right to a private bank is not.

The last time I checked the U.S. Mint and the BEP are both still governmental bodies. The fed might issue money, but the government prints it, which is what Donal said.

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

The last time I checked the U.S. Mint and the BEP are both still governmental bodies. The fed might issue money, but the government prints it, which is what Donal said.

Semantics

 

[UnrepentantSinner]

Semantics

Right. Except the Fed is not printing or coining currency, the government is. That is within the Constitution.

 

[Donal]

Semantics

Of course it is semantics. We are talking about the wording of the most important legal document in the country. Exact wording plays a huge role in its interpretation and application.

Have you ever actually met a lawyer?

 

[stanleywinthrop]

Yes, but the right to cede that right to a private bank is not.

Tell me what does the phrase "To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof." Mean to you?

 

[grunion]

All this evokes a childhood memory of the Dick Gregory For President Dollar Bill "scandal" in 1968.

I would suggest Paul's defense to be similar to Gregory's, who reportedly said something like "nobody with any sense would ever think that a black man could ever be on US Currency." I would place Paul's hopes for the presidency around where Gregory's were at the time.