Kevin_Lowe
Unregistered
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2003
- Messages
- 12,221
This is largely my point; that the seemingly statistical data is at least as unreliable as asking the perpetrators their motives. That's why, earlier on, I suggested that even if you could identify a seemingly reverse correlation between the proliferation of porn and the incidence of rape it would tell you no more than a reverse correlation with the incidence of iPod use, eating BigMacs, etc. would. It's the old Pastafarian pirates again!
Sometimes things that correlate really are cause and effect. If you control for every other relevant variable, you can be pretty sure that you are looking at cause and effect rather than coincidence.
Whereas you can't control for every other variable when you are asking rapists why they think they did what they did. The best you can possibly hope for is that their answers could give you a lead on a relevant variable to investigate, and that this might lead you to construct a study that generated decent data. However if you aready have a pretty good idea what answer you are fishing for (porn) you might as well just cut out the redundant middle bit and go straight to a study of porn consumption and rape rates.
Last edited: