HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You Skeptics are soooooo predictable! One fabrication after another. And you think that noone will notice. That noone will suspect that highly biased skeptics, would in fact, manufacture events that never occurred. Tell me it isn't so. And now I have given you sufficient time to congratulate yourself and give Spektator a round of "attaboys", except for one thing, he forgot to dot his I's and cross his T's on this little scam. Now lets go over the details that Spektator overlooked in his obvious overeagerness to fabricate quite frankly, A GIANT LIE, in hopes of discrediting myself.
Bigfoot materialized for Jimmy Carter.
Here is what I stated. Notice that I did not state the Carter "met" a bigfoot. So if Carter stated that he never met a Bigfoot,that alleged statement does not contradict having a Bigfoot materilizing in the vicinity of Carter. So when Spektator, a highly biased skeptic, claims that he is putting any claim to rest with a his highly questionable alleged quote, it is absolutely ludicrous. Here is why.
There is about 140 highway miles between Plains, Georgia (Carter's home) and Atlanta, Georgia (Carter Center location) which normally requires at least 2 days for snail mail.
Spektator states that Carter is not often at the Carter Center. Spektator claims he "spoke" to the Center, thus he was not "at" the
Center. Spektator claims that he "wrote a note", so he used snail mail instead of email. Spektator also claims that he "received a note" from Carter, which means he received snail mail.
Mail transit time from Spektator's residence to Carter Library (2 days)
Turnaround time to get back into the mail to Carter's home (1 day)
Mail transit time from Carter Center to Carter's residence (2 days)
Minimum time to receive, read and reply by Carter, assuming Spektator's mail has the HIGHEST PRIORITY (1 day)
Mail transit time direct to Spektator's residence (2 days)
Intermediate weekend where post office is closed (2 days)
Thanksgiving Holiday (1 day delay)
Add for 2nd weekend involved (2 days)
Minimum required total turnaround time = 12 days
Spektator's post #1068 Dated Wednesday 11/14/2007 which was just YESTURDAY.
"I should have checked my calendar, by the way--I'm going with a group to the Carter Center on Friday, not today, to see a presentation by historian Daniel Walker Howe. Sometimes Mr. Carter is present for these events, sometimes not. In any case, I have reserved a place next month for a talk given by Mr. and Mrs. Carter at the Center. I'll keep you all posted."
As of yesturday, Spektator did not apparently have the idea of either calling the Center or writing a note to Carter. So the earliest he would have inquired at the Center is yesturday, and the earliest he could have begun the note exchange process, is yesturday. This is what an attorney would call a CONTRADICTION. Once your contradict reality, you have effectively committed perjury. In other words, you are now considered a liar and an unreliable witness. Now any 1st grader can add 12 days to yesturday, and come up with the earliest probably time that this alleged exchange of notes could have taken place. The earliest date would have been November 26th, which is still a wee bit into the future. Like 11 days into the future. Yet at 10:49 am on the day immediately following a date where he apparently had no idea how to get in touch with Carter and field a Bigfoot question to him, SPEKTATOR SOMEHOW HAS RECEIVED A HAND WRITTEN NOTE FROM FORMER PRESIDENT CARTER HIMSELF. THAT TIME LINE, WOULD MAKE SPEKTATOR'S ALLEGATION, AN ABSOLUTE IMPOSSIBILITY. Spektator's own mail most likely has barely left his own post office today, yet he claims that he has received this note that requires 12 days in transit. So Spektator, instead of proving my claim to be mistaken, HE IN FACT HAS PROVIDED IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE THAT NOT ONLY IS HIS CARTER NOTE CLAIM IS A LIE, BUT THEN THAT EVERYTHING HE STATES IS A LIE. A LIE BY VIRTUE OF THE IMPOSSIBLE TIME LINE REQUIRED FOR THE EXCHANGE OF NOTES TO HAVE EVEN TAKEN PLACE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Today is not a good day to be either Spektator or a skeptic. Why? Because he just prooved that he cannot EVER be relied up to state the truth, ABOUT ANYTHING! He furthermore, has brought disgrace upon ALL SKEPTICS.
I REST MY CASE, YOUR HONOR!
