Blanchard Doesn't Buy Thermite Myth

Max Photon said:
* * *

As far as evidence of thermite is concerned, Blanchard knows - as everyone knows - that no fire affected perimeter panels from WTC2 were even collected or examined. So there is no way Blanchard can claim that there was no evidence of thermite use in or on these panels.


So kiddies, remember, Blanchard may have tackled Steven Jones and the THERMITE=CUTTING crew, but he never even touched Max Photon's MAX-MIHOP.

Sorry guys, Blanchard's paper is a sad, uncreative, bullying piece of cr@p. Only a total moron would parade that thing around.


Max


ETA: By the way, if Blanchard would like to debate me on this thread, in front of all you simpletonians, I'd be happy to.


* * *
Click to expand...

So our proof for your theory is that there is no evidence for your theory. Yes, clearly Blanchard is the moron you claim him to be....
 
What was that Max? A parade of morons?

Jonnyclueless said:
So our proof for your theory is that there is no evidence for your theory. Yes, clearly Blanchard is the moron you claim him to be....
Click to expand...


I said those who parade his cr@ppy paper are morons.

Blanchard is simply wrong.


* * *
 
And would you FED-MAX that to me, thanks.

T.A.M. said:
I have a question. Why on gods earth (dear god am I going there) would the evil Conspirators go to all the trouble and risk of planting Thermite, designing an apparatus to do so, through out the WTCs, only to weaken the steel. Seems to me if you are gonna take the risk, you would overkill...overshoot, to make sure there was NO CHANCE OF FAILURE.

I await what I am sure will be a "fascinating" response.

TAM:)
Click to expand...


Well you won't have to wait long there, good buddy.

I answered your exact question yesterday:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3151832#post3151832

(Fast-track for the incrowd. :cool: )


Max

* * *
 
Max Photon said:
I said those who parade his cr@ppy paper are morons.

Blanchard is simply wrong.


* * *
Click to expand...


and of course you have the credentials to refute his claims.

Please point out what he gets wrong, and bring forth your expertise and show why (with evidence) that he is. You can take 1 point at a time.

Otherwise, you're nothing more than hot-air.
 
Wave to the particles, Max.

Arus808 said:
and of course you have the credentials to refute his claims.

Please point out what he gets wrong, and bring forth your expertise and show why (with evidence) that he is. You can take 1 point at a time.

Otherwise, you're nothing more than hot-air.
Click to expand...



Actually, I am electromagnetic oscillations in spacetime.


* * *
 
Last edited:
You wrap the inside on the outside....

Newtons Bit said:
Perhaps if you understood the design of the towers, or thought about the design for five seconds, you would have seen that the "natural hiddy-holes" would have been welded over after the erection bolts were tightened.
Click to expand...



Sir Fig Newton is still busy scouring FEMA high-resolution debris photos for just one example of a perimeter panel box column with one of its bolt-access-holes welded shut.

(Here's the tricky part...)


* * *
 
Max Photon said:
Actually, I am electromagnetic oscillations in spacetime.


* * *
Click to expand...


How does this answer my question? Bring forth your evidence and expertise on what Blanchard got wrong. You can do a point by point refutation if needed. One point - you prove wrong.

As we say, put-up-or-shut-up.
 
afinemadness said:
No Max you have the burden of proof incorrect. You need to show us 1 that is filled with Thermite.
Click to expand...

I'd actually settle for seeing pictures of two columns (post collapse) that didn't have cover plates over the access holes.
 
After you let the Fig Newtons settle...

Newtons Bit said:
I'd actually settle for seeing pictures of two columns (post collapse) that didn't have cover plates over the access holes.
Click to expand...



SirFig,

We can't possibly be talking about the same thing.

GoFig.


* * *
 
Max Photon said:
I said those who parade his cr@ppy paper are morons.

Blanchard is simply wrong.


* * *
Click to expand...


Ah, but people who have actually read his paper disagree. Remember, unlike you, Blanchard knows something about demolition.

When Apathoid destroyed your fantasy about remote-controlled 757s and 767s, you lied and pretended to have read his paper. You didn't--if you made an attempt to read it, you weren't able to comprehend it.

Again, why should a megalomaniacal phony be able to disprove the conclusions of an expert in his field?
 
Max:

I did not see anywhere in that post, a reference to why they only used enough Thermite to WEAKEN the steel, as opposed to using enough to cut the steel, which would insure the success of their sekrit plan.

TAM:)
 
I received this e-mail from Blanchard last night:

"Just for yucks, ask him how the thermite/shock tubes utilize gravity sideways so that beams can be cut, and can affect the hundreds of beams required to cause sufficient failure. He's got a better argument saying his lasers simply cut the beams...at least that COULD happen in future-fantasyland."


Let us note that Blanchard asks in the OP several questions that Max refuses to respond to.
 
Last edited:
MAx has stated the thermite did not cut the steel, but only "weakened" it. As to why the ebil conspirators took such a chance is beyond me.

TAM:)
 
who makes up lies about 9/11 - mcc

Max Photon said:
Actually, I am electromagnetic oscillations in spacetime.
* * *
Click to expand...
yes, and your oscillating lies about 9/11 in disrespect to all the other electromagnetic oscillations who can not speak to you due to 9/11. Why not go find some people who lost people on 9/11 and pedal these lies to them?

Someone how makes up lies about 9/11. No proof, just makes it up. Thanks for showing me how to be so disrespectful to others. Good job thermite person who makes up lies about 9/11. Thanks for showing me how to be a disrespectful. Go tell your friends and family you have do not it; made up lies and not give any care about those who were killed on 9/11. What is your goal? To be disrespectful and make up lies like Dylan Avery, Fetzer, Jones, and the rest of 9/11 truth?
 
I think the other problem with the CD claims is that even in 2001 CDs were on their way out in favor of mp3 technology. I think perhaps the question should be, were the toweres brought down by mp3. BUt even that seems sill since both a CD or an mp3 loud enough to take the towers down would be heard by everyone there. Even if the government controlled media edited the CD or mp3 out of the video footage and used a delay, it still wouldn't account for the people who were actually there. I think maybe we should look for quotes of eyewitnesses hearing a CD or mp3.
 
T.A.M. said:
MAx has stated the thermite did not cut the steel, but only "weakened" it. As to why the ebil conspirators took such a chance is beyond me.

TAM:)
Click to expand...


One of the many problems with Max's fantasies is that thermite is not used to "weaken" steel. Max knows absolutely nothing about the use of thermite.
 
A link is established between Max Photon and Brent Blanchard

* * *


I see we've established contact with Mr. Blanchard.

I have some other commitments to attend to, but I look forward to addressing the issues he struggles with in the OP.


Max

* * *
 
Max Photon said:
* * *


I see we've established contact with Mr. Blanchard.

I have some other commitments to attend to, but I look forward to addressing the issues he struggles with in the OP.


Max

* * *
Click to expand...


coming from someone with no demolition experience, i believe, YOU"RE the one with issues here, not Blanchard.


why did you gloss over my request that you present your claims to refute blanchard and support it with evidence?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom