linusrichard
Master Poster
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2007
- Messages
- 2,710
It looks like this author of hydraulic texts still in use also applied his knowledge to a thorough examination of the Bible and its references to currently known scientific phenomenon and processes.
http://www.creationevidence.org/scientific_evid/se_scripture.html
You are a brick wall. Have you looked at these passages? We have. Some of them do not describe a scientific phenomenon or process. None of them describe a scientific phenomenon or process in a way that would be unfamiliar to people at the time.
A lot of people in this thread have quoted specific examples of the passages from that link, and talked about why they don't say what you say they say. If you want to argue in this thread, the most effective thing you could do would be to address those - quote specific passages, and discuss why they do say what you say they say. But you aren't going to do this, for reasons which are obvious, at least to the rest of us.

