• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

(Ed) Fetzer claims JREF Forum Members afraid to debate him

Where is this moderated debate supposed to be held anyway? Who is going to have "home field advantage"?
 
Aqua323 said:
Is anyone prepared to do the debate? Apparently, Mr Weick was happy with the terms that Fetzer asked for.
Click to expand...

Been there, done that. Mr. Fetzer very ungraciously forgets that JREF forum members paid his airfare to New York for these debates. Next.

Hardfire TV program: Wieck, Roberts, Fetzer: Part 1 – Part 2 – Part 3
 
Last edited:
Aqua323 said:
What part of my opening post did you not understand? It's a debate on the Pentagon.

The fixed position means that the JREF members must present evidence of the positive claim that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon, rather than just challenging Fetzer's view.
Click to expand...

Ah you're right sorry about that.

Correction qarnos: I'm guessing that it means something like anyone from here debating him about the Pentagon is not able to bring up post crash photo evidence, eyewitness evidence, DNA evidence, etc... while he is free to ramble about the hole being too small, the engine being too small, and other such debunked nonsense.
 
Redtail said:
Ah you're right sorry about that.

Correction qarnos: I'm guessing that it means something like anyone from here debating him about the Pentagon is not able to bring up post crash photo evidence, eyewitness evidence, DNA evidence, etc... while he is free to ramble about the hole being too small, the engine being too small, and other such debunked nonsense.
Click to expand...


No, as I said, the debator can bring up anything he likes in support of the positive claim that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. It should be easy for any JREF heavyweight to tear Fetzer a new one........shouldn't it?
 
Aqua323 said:
No, as I said, the debator can bring up anything he likes in support of the positive claim that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. It should be easy for any JREF heavyweight to tear Fetzer a new one........shouldn't it?
Click to expand...
As I already said: Who cares? The guy's nuts! You even said so.
 
Gravy said:
Been there, done that. Mr. Fetzer very ungraciously forgets that JREF forum members paid his airfare to New York for these debates. Next.

QUOTE]


Paid his air fare???

That doesn't sound like a group of people who isn't interested in what he has to say.
Click to expand...
 
Aqua323 said:
No, as I said, the debator can bring up anything he likes in support of the positive claim that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. It should be easy for any JREF heavyweight to tear Fetzer a new one........shouldn't it?
Click to expand...

Watch the debate with Gravy, pay attention to his "debate style", that's why it's pointless to debate him.
 
Aqua323 said:
No, as I said, the debator can bring up anything he likes in support of the positive claim that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. It should be easy for any JREF heavyweight to tear Fetzer a new one........shouldn't it?
Click to expand...

Would you or Fetzer be willing to pay an appearance fee? Otherwise it sounds like a colossal waste of someone's time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom