Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week

Yeah, cause opposing gay marriage[edited] is really just the same as stoning homosexuals. The hypocrisy! :rolleyes:

Fixed.

Please do not use the quote button and then change the quote.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LibraryLady
 
Last edited by a moderator:

:rolleyes:
What non-christians are being disenfranchised? And how, exactly, are Christians trying to establish a theocracy? Are you just making stuff up? Because it sure as hell looks like it.

And it's not simply a lack of condoms which causes AIDS, you know. Most cases of transmission are easily preventable without a condom.
 
How is that anti-semitic? Is there a scientific justification for the practice?

The merits of circumcision are debated. But,frankly, the inflammatory language Armstrong was using is a pretty good indication of a dislike of the Jewish People.
It cracks me up that the same people who try to portray all Christians as a bunch of fanatics get upset if anybody points out Islamic Extremism.
And,frankly,Islamic Extremism is getting a much bigger body count these days.
 
I don't care if you had a good point to make or not, putting words in someone else's mouth (or in this case a quote box) is offensive, and unbecoming of a critical thinker.

I bolded my additions, and including the link to the post.
 
Actually you should not be banned;you are good example of how a seclularist can be just as bigoted as the worst religous fundy.

And you, sir, are a liar.

The way you lefties pretend there is no such thing as Islamic extemism and that it poses no threat to the US is amusing. The ultimate Ostrich solution:Stick you head in the sand and it will go away. The term Islamo Facism is the wrong term,but to say that anybody who thinks the Islamic Extremism is a clear and present danger is a bigot is ,frankly,stupid.

Who here has denied the existence of Islam militants and their willingless to, say, fly planes into buildings?

Answer: No one.
 
Still, Ziggurat never said those things.

You could have just as easily made your point in a more honest way.

Satire in the form of modifying another's post, indicating it, and declaring it "fixed" has gone on for so long on this forum that there have been threads pleading for people to stop.
 
Satire in the form of modifying another's post, indicating it, and declaring it "fixed" has gone on for so long on this forum that there have been threads pleading for people to stop.

I seem to recall the mods having ruled against such a practice recently. I'll try and find where I saw that.
 
Ok,if Islamo Fascists is a bad term (and I think it is) what should we call OSama and company? One that is an accurate description of those who are willing to carry out acts of mass terrorism in the name of Islam?
I am still puzzled by how some "Progressives" seem to want to attack Christian Fundamentalism at every opportunity,but give a pass to Islamic Fundamentalism.
 
Ok,if Islamo Fascists is a bad term (and I think it is) what should we call OSama and company? One that is an accurate description of those who are willing to carry out acts of mass terrorism in the name of Islam?
I am still puzzled by how some "Progressives" seem to want to attack Christian Fundamentalism at every opportunity,but give a pass to Islamic Fundamentalism.

Please find an example of someone here who wants to "give a pass to Islamic Fundamentalism." Honestly, what's wrong with "Islamic miltiant?" They're Islamic, check. They're militant, check. Both terms are accurate and precise.
 
I don't think "islamo-fascist" is an attack on all muslims any more than "white supremacist" is an attack on all white people.
 

Back
Top Bottom