The purpose of this protest is as simple as it is crucial: to confront the two Big Lies of the political left: that George Bush created the war on terror and that Global Warming is a greater danger to Americans than the terrorist threat.
Did you know that it's Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week?
[qimg]http://www.terrorismawareness.org/images/43tt.jpg[/qimg]
Did I?
Well, what would you think of say, a pointless and confrontational protest called,
American Imperialism awareness week
with
[qimg]http://www.gallerym.com/images/work/big/pulitzer_nick_ut_vietnam_napalm_kim_phuc_6872_L.jpg[/qimg]
this, as the picture?
Would you perhaps feel that such a provocative name would be perhaps unhelpful and misrepresenting to a country of 300 Million people? Because I would. I'd see it as unintellectual and morally damaging to an already confused world.
Why couldn't this have gone in the 'Islam V Islamists' thread? Attention much?
Hey, don't shoot the messenger. I'm not endorsing it, just noting its existence.
Replace "fascist" with "conservative" above and I would have no trouble believing those words came from Coulter, Hannity, Robertson, Cheney, etc...
So, it is "Racism Against Arabs" week for the right-wing. I thought that was every week?
Hey, don't shoot the messenger. I'm not endorsing it, just noting its existence. If I had the time to read every thread in this forum I wouldn't have a full time job and be raising kids. In this case I found out about this from reading an article by Chris Hitchens in Slate and thought it might be something interesting enough to start a thread about.
And yes, you are right to note that American Imperialism has caused much death and suffering in Vietnam. Maybe we should have such a week too. I can recognize that we are not always angels. I would love a world without both American Imperialism and Islamofascism. Like in 'Imagine' by John Lennon. Of course I don't expect such a world will arrive in my lifetime, but it would be a nice world if it was possible.
I'm so glad we've left our Christo-Fascism days behind us (we did, didn't we?)
But really, isn't the use of "fascism" here just pure hyperbole? I've always understood fascism to mean a combination of extreme nationalism, extreme capitalism and extreme totalitarianism. While I agree must of what we see of Islamist ruled countries is totalitarian and heavy handed, I don't think we can legitimately call it fascism.
Does Bin Ladenism or Salafism or whatever we agree to call it have anything in common with fascism?
I think yes. The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Gonzalo Queipo de Llano so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures.
Ok sorry.
I must agree with many here at the curious choice of phrase, 'Islamofascism'. If anything, Islamism is an strange hybrid of totalitarianism and extreme anarchism given that God, not man, legislates the rules of man.
But at the same time, I am getting slightly curious about the phrase 'Islamophobia'. It seems to crop up a fair bit on the far left, and I wonder why 'Anti-Arabism' or 'Anti-Persian' or 'Religous Xenophobia' or even, 'racism' is not the norm. We all know anti-semetism is against the Jewish race, not the religion itself.
If people are saying that those who come from Muslim countries, or are Muslim themselves are racially inferior, then shame on them. But if it is somebody saying Islam is a rubbish faith, how is it any different from slagging off the Republican party or Scientologists? Because many are brown skinned?
Racism is wrong. But I think that it is reasonable to be scared of totalitarian ideologies, be they naziism, communism, fascism, juche, state shinto (emperor worship), or totalitarian religious ideologies including the former Catholic Church when the Inquisition had real power, or Scientology and other cults.
I want to make it clear that Arabs are not what scares me, it's the religion. I'm "Islamophobic" only in the same sense that I'm "Totalitariophobic." These are things that seem to be reasonable to worry about. To what extent is another matter.
No, I said it's wrong period.So racism is wrong, except when it can be justified to you by you. Okay.
I think you misunderstand me. I have no use for any religion. I don't conflate religion with race.Ironic, that: for the longest time, the number one justification for prejudice against Jews-- their religion. Sure, the details (Jews "rejected" Jesus and killed him and so on) were different, but they were stigmatized as a direct result of their religion and religious beliefs (they often "dress funny" or had/have different eating habits based on religious practices). In a lot of ways, white power antisemites still use some of these tired old reasons to hate on Jews, as well as their integration of Mein Kampf-ish rhetoric about "international bankers" and such.
It's natural to fear what you don't understand, but it's racist to prejudge based on that fear.
I did know that the demonisers are alive and well and as morally corrupt as ever. Is it a surprise to you?Did you know that it's Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week?
[qimg]http://www.terrorismawareness.org/images/43tt.jpg[/qimg]
You did mean Islam, Judaism, Christianity, Shintoism, Catholicism, Protestantism, Hindism etc didn't you?It is a bit of a double standard when we can humiliate and laugh at Tom Cruise and their Xenu warriors but cannot inflict the same ridicule upon Islam.
Chris Hitchens defends the term thusly:
E.J Armstrong said:Judaism, Christianity, Catholicism, Protestantism, didn't you?
E.J.Armstrong said:You did mean Islam, Judaism, Christianity, Shintoism, Catholicism, Protestantism, Hindism etc didn't you?
Those who need to mutilate the genitals of defenceless babies for their own personal and religious gratification all need to be made fun off don't you agree?