[Moderated]Pentagon Struck By Tomahawk Missile 'AND' A PLANE

[AMTMAN]

Terral:

I've asked this question before. Do you believe that AA was in on the conspiracy?

 

[AMTMAN]

Terral:

I've asked this question before. Do you believe that AA was in on the conspiracy?

 

[Drudgewire]

Rense.com has done some wonderful work

There aren't enough laughing dogs in the universe.

 

[Pardalis]

So we got two planes, one used as a decoy which "flew-over", another is a retrofitted military plane, remote-controlled mind you, and a Tomahawk missile. Add to that planted DNA and corpses of the passengers, fake FDR and debris and the light poles...

All that with absolutely no witnesses... Way to go to make an immensely complicated conspiracy even more outrageously complex.

As our NWO rule books have always taught us: "keep it simple!"

 

[JamesB]

Hi DGM:




Surely you jest! The engine components found at the Pentagon are from a Pratt & Whitney JT8D engine.

http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm

http://www.rense.com/general67/911eng.htm

Rense.com has done some wonderful work in the engine department. That second link has the most data. I would offer my commentary on all the evidence, but your side of this debate cannot place one piece of a real Rolls-Royce engine anywhere near the Pentagon. :0)

Please try to prove me wrong.

GL,

Terral

ROTLFMAO You are citing Karl Schwarz? Even the Loose Change guys have realized what a lying nutcase he is.

OK, where is the laughing dog icon?

 

[WildCat]

I make a few mistakes here and there,

You don't say?

 

[AMTMAN]

Hi DGM:




Surely you jest! The engine components found at the Pentagon are from a Pratt & Whitney JT8D engine.

http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm

http://www.rense.com/general67/911eng.htm

Rense.com has done some wonderful work in the engine department. That second link has the most data. I would offer my commentary on all the evidence, but your side of this debate cannot place one piece of a real Rolls-Royce engine anywhere near the Pentagon. :0)

Please try to prove me wrong.

GL,

Terral

Could you please tell me what your expertise is in jet engines.

 

[lapman]

Hi DGM:




Surely you jest! The engine components found at the Pentagon are from a Pratt & Whitney JT8D engine.

http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm

http://www.rense.com/general67/911eng.htm

Rense.com has done some wonderful work in the engine department. That second link has the most data. I would offer my commentary on all the evidence, but your side of this debate cannot place one piece of a real Rolls-Royce engine anywhere near the Pentagon. :0)

Please try to prove me wrong.

GL,

Terral

From 911myths

...the above image shows a diagram of the high pressure system within the RB211-535 engine. Also included are the objects identified in the Pentagon wreckage and their relative locations within the engine. As discussed in the main article, all three of these pieces of debris are identical matches to or at least consistent with the components found in the Rolls-Royce RB211-535 turbofan aboard a Boeing 757.
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml

Do I get a prize?

 

[HyJinX]

Terral, You're wrong.

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml

 

[DGM]

Hi DGM:




Surely you jest! The engine components found at the Pentagon are from a Pratt & Whitney JT8D engine.

http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm

http://www.rense.com/general67/911eng.htm

Rense.com has done some wonderful work in the engine department. That second link has the most data. I would offer my commentary on all the evidence, but your side of this debate cannot place one piece of a real Rolls-Royce engine anywhere near the Pentagon. :0)

Please try to prove me wrong.

GL,

Terral

The actual engines have been examined and are in the possession of AA. Along with the rest of the airframe. And yes they are Rolls-Royce RB211's.

I don't have to prove you wrong because no one believes you. Lurkers (the only people I care about) will check for themselves.

Terral: of the 4.6% that believe the "twoofers", how many are no-planers like yourself?

 

[BenBurch]

Terral, You're wrong.

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml

From that page;

For some reason, most of the conspiratorial sites instead make extensive reference to the A-3 being powered by a Pratt & Whitney JT8D engine. Moreover, these sites claim that the JT8D is a turbojet. The JT8D is actually a low-bypass turbofan that was developed for use aboard commercial aircraft like the 727 and 737. We have not found any source that indicates the JT8D was ever used on the A-3 Skywarrior, so it is unclear why the originators of the A-3 theory are so infatuated with this particular powerplant. Nevertheless, we will include it in our investigation for completeness.

 

[Pardalis]

Terral, do you even realize how outrageous the level of complexity of your conspiracy theory is?

What if something screwed up? What if the decoy fly-over plane was delayed, even slightly? Do you realize that if this is true, the conspirators had to execute their plan with milisecond accuracy or the whole thing would have been uncovered?

Your narrative would have been rejected by the producers of 24 for lack or credibility.

 

[Bell]

Hi Nim:



Just show us your pictures of Flight 77 crashed ANYWHERE and you win the prize. :0)



Terral

Terral, why ask us for evidence when we know you refuse to look at all the evidence we provide you with?

I posted this link before. I posted links to a dozen photos showing UA93 debris. Others did too. You never bother to look at it.

The hell, if the lurkers look at the links and recognize your claims for what they are - bogus - I'm satisfied.

Welcome to ignore Killtown Terral.

 

[leftysergeant]

Rense is not a reliable source. In case you haven't noticed, most of the contributors are white nationalists who have an interest in disinforming the public. That's what they do. they can't start their RaHoWa based on fact, any more than Hitler started WWII on a factual basis.

Rense actually started the rumor about "evidence hauled away in a box covered in a blue tarpaulin." They admitted the mistake later, but did little to remove all traces of their mistake from the mythology of the day.

 

[CurtC]

So now it's a nuclear tipped Tomahawk?


That is so going in a comic!

You may also want to note, for the uninformed, that electromagnetic pulses from nuclear warheads are caused when they're detonated in the ionosphere.

 

[DGM]

Terral, do you even realize how outrageous the level of complexity of your conspiracy theory is?

What if something screwed up? What if the decoy fly-over plane was delayed, even slightly? Do you realize that if this is true, the conspirators had to execute their plan with milisecond accuracy or the whole thing would have been uncovered?

Your narrative would have been rejected by the producers of 24 for lack or credibility.

And god forbid someone was there and witnesses it............Oh wait never mind.

 

[Terral]

The Pentagon Is The Most Well-Protected Military Installation On Earth BY FAR

Hi ZENS and Funk:

ZENS >> It's interesting. I've often wondered what defenses would do if given an opportunity that they witnessed for sure something about to hit the Pentagon.

Funk >> What defenses?

Your question sounds funny, as if the Department of Defense has no ‘defense system’ for the most heavily guarded military installation in the world! The US Military does not advertise the Pentagon’s Defense Network to just anybody. My bother just happens to be a Navy man and he knows nothing on earth can approach and strike the Pentagon, unless someone on the ‘inside’ turns off the system. The Pentagon had the Phalanx Close-In Weapons System ( http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=2100&tid=800&ct=2 ) when he was in the navy years ago. That does not even begin to talk about the five anti-missile batteries:

http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/boeing.htm

. . . Further, it is incorrect that this decision can only be made by the President. The interception of a suspect civilian aircraft by fighters is automatic and does not require any kind of political decision making. It should have taken place on 11 September when the transponder was cut off. The fighters should have taken off immediately - unless they were ordered to "stand down."

Again, let me reiterate the fact that the flight 77 was invisible ONLY to CIVILIAN aviation authorities. The fact that the transponders were turned off automatically alerts military air defense.

Next problem: There are five extremely sophisticated anti-missile batteries in place to protect the Pentagon from an airborne attack. These anti-missile batteries operate automatically.

Pentagon spokesman, Lieutenant-Colonel Vic Warzinski claimed the military had not been expecting such an attack. This is not credible. Because the transponder had been turned off, the Pentagon knew full well where that aircraft was. Communications between civilian air traffic controllers and the various federal authorities functioned perfectly.

The Pentagon Security Network becomes hot and active when commercial jets are ordered down ‘and’ a blip on the radar turns off the transponder. Everything you ever read about Dick Cheney’s and Donald Rumsfeld’s 9/11 “Stand Down” ( http://dodprotocol911.0catch.com/ ) orders have to do with disabling the Pentagon Defense System Security Grid, which allowed the E-Ring wall to be struck not once, but twice within a 5 minute period. After all, if the DoD Defense Network was up and running like normal, nothing on earth could possibly hit the Pentagon on 9/11 or any other day. The fact that you appear to know ‘nothing’ at all about DoD ‘defense’ (heh) capabilities is a little bit funny.

Heh . . . That little guy cracks a 911Truther up. :0)

Terral

 

[JamesB]

Rense is not a reliable source. In case you haven't noticed, most of the contributors are white nationalists who have an interest in disinforming the public. That's what they do. they can't start their RaHoWa based on fact, any more than Hitler started WWII on a factual basis.

Rense actually started the rumor about "evidence hauled away in a box covered in a blue tarpaulin." They admitted the mistake later, but did little to remove all traces of their mistake from the mythology of the day.

In August Rense.com actually took a two year old article, changed the date on it, and came up with "Last week the Washington Post reported..."

http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2007/08/troofer-sources-and-tiime-shifts.html

 

[Garrette]

Hi ZENS and Funk:




Your question sounds funny, as if the Department of Defense has no ‘defense system’ for the most heavily guarded military installation in the world! The US Military does not advertise the Pentagon’s Defense Network to just anybody. My bother just happens to be a Navy man and he knows nothing on earth can approach and strike the Pentagon, unless someone on the ‘inside’ turns off the system. The Pentagon had the Phalanx Close-In Weapons System ( http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=2100&tid=800&ct=2 ) when he was in the navy years ago. That does not even begin to talk about the five anti-missile batteries:

http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/boeing.htm




The Pentagon Security Network becomes hot and active when commercial jets are ordered down ‘and’ a blip on the radar turns off the transponder. Everything you ever read about Dick Cheney’s and Donald Rumsfeld’s 9/11 “Stand Down” ( http://dodprotocol911.0catch.com/ ) orders have to do with disabling the Pentagon Defense System Security Grid, which allowed the E-Ring wall to be struck not once, but twice within a 5 minute period. After all, if the DoD Defense Network was up and running like normal, nothing on earth could possibly hit the Pentagon on 9/11 or any other day. The fact that you appear to know ‘nothing’ at all about DoD ‘defense’ (heh) capabilities is a little bit funny.

http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/YoSoFunny.gif

Heh . . . That little guy cracks a 911Truther up. :0)

Terral

You're brother is either fictional or a navy man given to fiction. In short: No.

 

[Pardalis]

I wonder how the conspirators rehearsed it all.