Greetings to All:
The Pentagon was attacked at 9:32 AM by a Tomahawk Missile and again at 9:37 AM by a refitted remote-controlled A-3 Skywarrior Jet [stop demonizing me as a 'no-planer' and just offer rebuttals to my work] in a second attack. The Department of Defense has been running a cover up operation from the very beginning in a case literally filled to the brim with carefully planted disinformation to throw 911Truth investigators off the track. The Official Government/Media timeline ( http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/11/chronology.attack/ ) has been manipulated and purposely fabricated to give credibility and believability to a Flight 77 HOAX with no basis in reality whatsoever. Official Pentagon 9/11 pictures have been photoshopped to conceal the 911Truth that the E-Ring wall was struck not once, but twice in two separate attacks just five minutes apart.
This story begins with evidence from the Arlington County After-Action Report ( http://www.arlingtonva.us/Departments/Fire...fter_report.pdf ) that “Captain Steve McCoy and the crew of Engine 101 were in route to a training session” traveling north on Interstate 395. At 9:38 AM they were talking about the World Trade Center attacks and saw a Jetliner disappear from sight with an explosion. However, they were “unable to pinpoint the precise location,” because at that point only the Foam 161 fire crew had responded to the 9:32 AM missile attack. Right away you should realize this report and time place the ‘second’ crew’s location having nothing to do with the Foam 161 crew ‘already at the Pentagon.’ The report says,
Fort Myer Rescue Engine 161 (second truck from Foam 161) is mentioned in this report: http://www.public-action.com/911/rescue/nfpa-article/
The problem with both reports is they tell the story from perspectives other than from the vantage point of Fort Myer Foam 161 that was "on station" ( http://arlingtonfirejournal.blogspot.com/2...t-pentagon.html = second from bottom ) and at the scene ‘before’ the 9:38 AM timelines established by ‘others’ coming along after the original Missile strike at 9:32 AM. The Fort Meyer "on station Foam 161" appears to be in position at 9:37 AM with firemen "outside the vehicle" (ACAAC Page 26 = A-4*) when the remote-controlled A-3 Skywarrior entered Pentagon airspace for the ‘second’ attack. The only way I can place Fort Meyer "Foam 161" on the scene near the entry hole to be hit in the A-3 Skywarrior attack is for them to be "outside the vehicle" responding to the ‘earlier’ 9:32 AM attack. These frames show how the missile approached and detonated:
This fire is limited to the direct area surrounding the 18-feet diameter entry hole that Foam 161 was preparing to knocked down. However, this picture shows evidence of a much wider attack running far north of the E-ring entry hole. The Foam 161 crewmen ("Mark Skipper and Alan Wallace"*) were reported to be in a state of "shock" after the 9:37 AM A-3 Skywarrior attack, so I am not even sure if they realize today the reason they were standing outside the truck in time to be almost killed. By the time they recovered, the landscape was filled with engines and firemen; so they began assisting people evacuating the area. Click on the Geoffmetcalf link to see the best image, then my picture is a cut showing the A-3 Skywarrior impact location.
Too big to post. Use the zoom option > http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/images/2.jpg
Examine the original large photo to realize there is no foam yet sprayed on anything. The time of this picture must be between 9:32 AM and the period 'before' Foam Unit #331 ( http://www.public-action.com/911/rescue/nfpa-article/ ) showed up later to put down foam. The important detail to note is our fire is raging at least forty feet to the left (north) of the SUV, which seems a highly unlikely location for any fire from the original missile attack directly over the cable spools ( http://www.911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/e.../dodvideos.html = examine all 9:32 AM frames carefully ) .
A close up shot reveals our tall green undamaged SUV with mystery debris littering the area south (right) of Column Line 7. The white Nissan is parked in front of Column Line 6, which is 80 feet north of the center (Line 14) of our E-Ring entry hole. That means the fire burning to the north of our Nissan is at least 120 feet from the original impact crater, which appears highly unlikely from the damage recorded in the original missile strike. While we do not have nearly enough damage to the E-Ring limestone wall to support the Official Flight 77 cover story, we appear to have plenty of evidence to support a second attack from a remote-controlled A-3 Skywarrior. Here is News footage of my eyewitnesses to a small plane striking the Pentagon. Don Wright testifies to seeing a 'twin-engine' plane crashing into the Pentagon fitting the description perfectly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iD0qpbwHCYI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=schV0rKCRwA
http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Ter...-DSC_0430-1.jpg
This appears to be a first response picture of Foam Unit #331 on the scene directly in front of the 18-feet diameter entry hole. Note the tall green SUV appears undamaged, but with a large section of debris stretched across the hood.
However, this NF #2-5 11:55 AM entry on my timeline shows our SUV is now much shorter and has become white AND is now located in front of Column Line 4. :0) This picture appears to be a fake. :0) These two vehicles change colors often and appear on fire in many of the pictures, because the photoshop artist used the smoke to cover his mistakes. Therefore, my Sundial measurements can very well off, if the two merged pictures are from 9/11 and 9/12 or beyond.
This picture of the left side damage shows our little white two-door Nissan and the larger green undamaged SUV between Column Lines 5 and 7.
Great Website for more info >> http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies8.htm
This photo shows the area in front of Column Lines 5 – 8 and our vehicles have switched colors. :0) ( more on that here: http://911review.org/brad.com/pentagonpictures.html ) We have two sets of Pentagon photographs with changing vehicles clearly indicating a high percentage of these pictures have been doctored to hide plane wreckage from the second attack at 9:37 AM.
This is my NF#3 picture from the “DoD No Fight Fire” ( http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=15882 ) Thread given the 1:00 PM time very near the Zenith where the sun climbs to its highest point in the sky. I have been assuming this picture was taken on 9/11, because the fire is raging some 250 feet from the original E-Ring entry hole. However, even our white SUV and black sports car have been removed from this picture either manually or by photoshopping the image. I am beginning to believe my original observations of these lackadaisical firemen have been wrong from the beginning, because they too have been cleverly pasted into the background image. Whoever doctored these images is definitely hiding evidence between Column Lines 5 and 13 where I now believe the A-3 Skywarrior Jet attack occurred at 9:37 AM. The Department of Defense has manipulated practically all the Pentagon data to fabricate a fictitious timeline in support of their Official Flight 77 Cover Story. This explains why so many 911Truthers have contradictory explanations for what really happened at the Pentagon, because there were two attacks (missile and plane) all along.
Terral
PS. My "Flight 93" Case INCLUDES A PLANE. What in the heck is the matter with you guys? The PLANE certainly met an untimely demise on 9/11, but did not crash into that empty field. Moving my work out of here to then close the thread is an attempt to micromanage member content and that is the reason our fathers climbed into ships and left Europe. Think about it . . . and put my Flight 93 work back where it belongs in plain sight of everyone. Write your rebuttal 'IF' you have a case, which you do not . . . And, do not move this thread over your ridiculous "no plane" accusations, because everyone and their brother can see the PLANE appears in the OP Topic Title. This topic is also being debated here on a 'level playing field.'
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=16120
The Pentagon was attacked at 9:32 AM by a Tomahawk Missile and again at 9:37 AM by a refitted remote-controlled A-3 Skywarrior Jet [stop demonizing me as a 'no-planer' and just offer rebuttals to my work] in a second attack. The Department of Defense has been running a cover up operation from the very beginning in a case literally filled to the brim with carefully planted disinformation to throw 911Truth investigators off the track. The Official Government/Media timeline ( http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/11/chronology.attack/ ) has been manipulated and purposely fabricated to give credibility and believability to a Flight 77 HOAX with no basis in reality whatsoever. Official Pentagon 9/11 pictures have been photoshopped to conceal the 911Truth that the E-Ring wall was struck not once, but twice in two separate attacks just five minutes apart.
This story begins with evidence from the Arlington County After-Action Report ( http://www.arlingtonva.us/Departments/Fire...fter_report.pdf ) that “Captain Steve McCoy and the crew of Engine 101 were in route to a training session” traveling north on Interstate 395. At 9:38 AM they were talking about the World Trade Center attacks and saw a Jetliner disappear from sight with an explosion. However, they were “unable to pinpoint the precise location,” because at that point only the Foam 161 fire crew had responded to the 9:32 AM missile attack. Right away you should realize this report and time place the ‘second’ crew’s location having nothing to do with the Foam 161 crew ‘already at the Pentagon.’ The report says,
Fort Myer Rescue Engine 161 (second truck from Foam 161) is mentioned in this report: http://www.public-action.com/911/rescue/nfpa-article/
The problem with both reports is they tell the story from perspectives other than from the vantage point of Fort Myer Foam 161 that was "on station" ( http://arlingtonfirejournal.blogspot.com/2...t-pentagon.html = second from bottom ) and at the scene ‘before’ the 9:38 AM timelines established by ‘others’ coming along after the original Missile strike at 9:32 AM. The Fort Meyer "on station Foam 161" appears to be in position at 9:37 AM with firemen "outside the vehicle" (ACAAC Page 26 = A-4*) when the remote-controlled A-3 Skywarrior entered Pentagon airspace for the ‘second’ attack. The only way I can place Fort Meyer "Foam 161" on the scene near the entry hole to be hit in the A-3 Skywarrior attack is for them to be "outside the vehicle" responding to the ‘earlier’ 9:32 AM attack. These frames show how the missile approached and detonated:
This fire is limited to the direct area surrounding the 18-feet diameter entry hole that Foam 161 was preparing to knocked down. However, this picture shows evidence of a much wider attack running far north of the E-ring entry hole. The Foam 161 crewmen ("Mark Skipper and Alan Wallace"*) were reported to be in a state of "shock" after the 9:37 AM A-3 Skywarrior attack, so I am not even sure if they realize today the reason they were standing outside the truck in time to be almost killed. By the time they recovered, the landscape was filled with engines and firemen; so they began assisting people evacuating the area. Click on the Geoffmetcalf link to see the best image, then my picture is a cut showing the A-3 Skywarrior impact location.
Too big to post. Use the zoom option > http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/images/2.jpg
Examine the original large photo to realize there is no foam yet sprayed on anything. The time of this picture must be between 9:32 AM and the period 'before' Foam Unit #331 ( http://www.public-action.com/911/rescue/nfpa-article/ ) showed up later to put down foam. The important detail to note is our fire is raging at least forty feet to the left (north) of the SUV, which seems a highly unlikely location for any fire from the original missile attack directly over the cable spools ( http://www.911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/e.../dodvideos.html = examine all 9:32 AM frames carefully ) .
A close up shot reveals our tall green undamaged SUV with mystery debris littering the area south (right) of Column Line 7. The white Nissan is parked in front of Column Line 6, which is 80 feet north of the center (Line 14) of our E-Ring entry hole. That means the fire burning to the north of our Nissan is at least 120 feet from the original impact crater, which appears highly unlikely from the damage recorded in the original missile strike. While we do not have nearly enough damage to the E-Ring limestone wall to support the Official Flight 77 cover story, we appear to have plenty of evidence to support a second attack from a remote-controlled A-3 Skywarrior. Here is News footage of my eyewitnesses to a small plane striking the Pentagon. Don Wright testifies to seeing a 'twin-engine' plane crashing into the Pentagon fitting the description perfectly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iD0qpbwHCYI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=schV0rKCRwA
http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Ter...-DSC_0430-1.jpg
This appears to be a first response picture of Foam Unit #331 on the scene directly in front of the 18-feet diameter entry hole. Note the tall green SUV appears undamaged, but with a large section of debris stretched across the hood.
However, this NF #2-5 11:55 AM entry on my timeline shows our SUV is now much shorter and has become white AND is now located in front of Column Line 4. :0) This picture appears to be a fake. :0) These two vehicles change colors often and appear on fire in many of the pictures, because the photoshop artist used the smoke to cover his mistakes. Therefore, my Sundial measurements can very well off, if the two merged pictures are from 9/11 and 9/12 or beyond.
This picture of the left side damage shows our little white two-door Nissan and the larger green undamaged SUV between Column Lines 5 and 7.
Great Website for more info >> http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies8.htm
This photo shows the area in front of Column Lines 5 – 8 and our vehicles have switched colors. :0) ( more on that here: http://911review.org/brad.com/pentagonpictures.html ) We have two sets of Pentagon photographs with changing vehicles clearly indicating a high percentage of these pictures have been doctored to hide plane wreckage from the second attack at 9:37 AM.
This is my NF#3 picture from the “DoD No Fight Fire” ( http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=15882 ) Thread given the 1:00 PM time very near the Zenith where the sun climbs to its highest point in the sky. I have been assuming this picture was taken on 9/11, because the fire is raging some 250 feet from the original E-Ring entry hole. However, even our white SUV and black sports car have been removed from this picture either manually or by photoshopping the image. I am beginning to believe my original observations of these lackadaisical firemen have been wrong from the beginning, because they too have been cleverly pasted into the background image. Whoever doctored these images is definitely hiding evidence between Column Lines 5 and 13 where I now believe the A-3 Skywarrior Jet attack occurred at 9:37 AM. The Department of Defense has manipulated practically all the Pentagon data to fabricate a fictitious timeline in support of their Official Flight 77 Cover Story. This explains why so many 911Truthers have contradictory explanations for what really happened at the Pentagon, because there were two attacks (missile and plane) all along.
Terral
PS. My "Flight 93" Case INCLUDES A PLANE. What in the heck is the matter with you guys? The PLANE certainly met an untimely demise on 9/11, but did not crash into that empty field. Moving my work out of here to then close the thread is an attempt to micromanage member content and that is the reason our fathers climbed into ships and left Europe. Think about it . . . and put my Flight 93 work back where it belongs in plain sight of everyone. Write your rebuttal 'IF' you have a case, which you do not . . . And, do not move this thread over your ridiculous "no plane" accusations, because everyone and their brother can see the PLANE appears in the OP Topic Title. This topic is also being debated here on a 'level playing field.'
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=16120
Last edited:
