The 9/11 Conspiracy Facts

As friends of mine on another forum like to say...

"pics, or it didn't happen". Or in this case, "documents, or it didn't happen".
 
DGM said:
I would like to see someone with a reliable track record translate that article. You have already shown you only see what you want to see.
Click to expand...
LMFAO!!!

The link to the original is there somewhere, go ahead and do it yourself!

D'uh... bunker!
 
I have never heard of specific warnings to 9/11, French or otherwise. The CIA, FBI, State dept, FAA and the airines all had major flaws in commincation with each other and plenty of missed opportunities but they had no specific warnings.
 
mjd1982 said:
No, French intel docs, sent to the CIA, read the post before you reply to it.

http://www.911blogger.com/node/7948

Posted this many times now.
Click to expand...

All see is a mention of hijacking American and United jets out of Frankfort. Nothing about hijacking planes in the US or flying them into buildings. The article even quotes the French Intelligence person as saying it is completly understandable why nothing was done.

In other words more hindsight with a little Texas' Sharpshooter thrown in to boot.
 
mjd1982 said:
No, I dont think you do. I'm guessing your desires probably don't leave the sofa very much, am I right?
Click to expand...

reported and....
This my job.
Tank004.jpg


you are wrong again. Jackass.
 
mjd1982 said:
No, I dont think you do. I'm guessing your desires probably don't leave the sofa very much, am I right?
Click to expand...

So, am I to understand that you haven't seen the actual document either and you're just regurgitating possible falsehoods that you found on the internet and then claiming that the information is factual?

Hmmmmm. Interesting approach to Truth™
 
mjd1982 said:
With regard to the airlines being in charge of their security- this is all very well, but since they do not have intel services telling them that people are plotting to hijack planes, there must , sensibly, exist a degree of co ordination between gov intel and the airlines. This is very simple. Now, we know that French intel warned the CIA that AQ were plotting to hijack United and AA planes, they told them this back in Jan. We know of course that there were big suspicions about AQ hijacking planes, all the way up til August. We also know that no one was warned by the Fed Gov about this- no agencies, no nothing. There were "no warnings" to quote the WH. So as I have said many times, it is not an issue that the gov didnt stop the attacks, when certain measures may or may not have been out of their reach, rather that they did not take any substantive steps that may have stopped the attack. This is the negligence that we are looking for; please dont make me say this again...
Click to expand...

Lets look shall we

First, no documentary evidence reviewed by the Commission or testimony we have received to this point has revealed that any level of the FAA possessed any credible and specific intelligence indicating that Usama Bin Ladin, al Qaeda, al Qaeda affiliates or any other group were actually plotting to hijack commercial planes in the United States and use them as weapons of mass destruction.

Second, the threat posed by Usama Bin Ladin, al Qaeda, and al Qaeda affiliates, including their interest in civil aviation, was well known to key civil aviation security officials. The potential threat of Middle Eastern terrorist groups to civil aviation security was acknowledged in many different official FAA documents. The FAA possessed information claiming that associates with Usama Bin Ladin in the 1990s were interested in hijackings and the use of an aircraft as a weapon.

Third, the potential for terrorist suicide hijacking in the United States was officially considered by the FAA’s Office of Civil Aviation Security dating back to at least March 1998. However in a presentation the agency made to air carriers and airports in 2000 and early 2001 the FAA discounted the threat because, “fortunately, we have no indication that any group is currently thinking in that direction"
Click to expand...

Neither Administrator Jane Garvey nor her deputy routinely reviewed daily intelligence, and what they did see was screened for them. She was unaware of a great amount of hijacking threat information from her own intelligence unit, which, in turn, was not deeply involved in the agency's policymaking process. Historically, decisive security action took place only after a disaster had occurred or a specific plot had been discovered.
Click to expand...

The FAA had no idea about any warnings? I do not think so
 
HyJinX said:
So, am I to understand that you haven't seen the actual document either and you're just regurgitating possible falsehoods that you found on the internet and then claiming that the information is factual?

Hmmmmm. Interesting approach to Truth™
Click to expand...

They use other approaches? :confused:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom