Could someone give me a quick recap as to the reason why Brown was killed by this supposed conspiracy?
As I pointed out earlier in this thread:
At his death, Ron Brown was under investigation by the FDIC, the Congressional Reform and Oversight Committee, the FBI, the Energy Department, the Senate Judiciary Committee and even his own Commerce Department Inspector General. He was scheduled to be deposed by Judicial Watch regarding the illegal sale of trade mission seats for campaign contributions. He was also about to be indicted by an independent council named Daniel Pearson. Brown's wife and son had already been indicted on related charges by Pearson. Pearson had plenty of documentary evidence and testimony on over a dozen serious crimes (like ending the trade embargo against North Vietnam for $700,000 dollars in bribes). The situation was so serious that Brown had retained a $750/hour attorney and he spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal. And matters only got worse. Only days before Brown's death, another 20 witnesses were subpoenaed focusing on Brown's dealings.
Nolanda Hill testified under oath that shortly before the ill fated flight, Brown met with Panetta, the Whitehouse Chief Of Staff, and turned over a stack of documents that would have proven he sold seats on trade missions for very large, illegal, contributions to the DNC. These documents were withheld in violation of the Judicial Watch subpoena. Nolanda swore under oath that Brown told Panetta "if I go down, so will everyone else".
Nolanda Hill also testified that shortly before the flight, Brown went to see Clinton and told him that he intended to enter a plea agreement and turn state's evidence if Clinton didn't quash the investigation. Clinton refused. She then testified that prior to making this threat, Brown wasn't scheduled to be on the trade mission flight that crashed. She says at the last minute the White House told Brown to go. The Whitehouse tried to smear Hill but they never proved that what she claimed was untrue ... for example, by proving that Brown had no meeting with Clinton shortly before the flight.
What you need to understand is that Brown was near the heart of a huge conspiracy. According to Nolanda Hill's sworn testimony, many millions of dollars in illegal DNC and Clinton campaign contributions were received through the sale of trade mission seats and in exchange for authorization by Ron Brown's Commerce Department to sell what in previous administrations was considered highly restricted missile, computer, radar, satellite, manufacturing and encryption technology. Others have testified to brown bags full of illegal campaign cash coming from the Chinese. Riady, who admitted to giving millions is thought to have been a conduit for other Chinese contributions.
Brown worked closely with John Huang (who the FBI labeled a Chinese spy), Riady, Chung, Middleton (highest Clinton Administration official to plead the 5th in Chinagate), and dozens of other people connected with criminal activities by the Clinton's and DNC. Keep in mind that well over a hundred people took the 5th or fled the United States in connection with the Chinagate and campaign finance scandals ... and that was with Reno and the Justice Department seemingly trying to coverup, rather than seriously investigate the matters. If Brown had talked to Pearson, he'd have caused a really serious problem for a lot of people, including Bill Clinton.
I can't but help think that trying to kill him by aircraft crash is a rather expensive, complicated, and very public way of doing it. Why not slip him a drug to cause a heart attack or use some other much more low-key method?
This is the government. They always make things complicated.
Regardless of whether it seems complicated or not, pathologists with expertise in gunshot voiced concerns about the wound and called for an autopsy. By law, the FBI should then have been called in. They weren't. And then we have the fact that the pathologist who officially ruled it blunt force trauma clearly lied about the evidence and his reasons for doing so. These facts alone should make one very suspicious.
Also, perhaps this isn't as complicated as you think. Spoofing the plane into a mountain doesn't take much resources. There were advantages to doing it this way. An aircraft accident can immediately be used as the cause of death. Most people won't question it. The crash can take place outside the country in place where access can be controlled (i.e., the press kept out). If he suffered a heart attack, he'd have been autopsied. You can bet on it. And it wouldn't have been an autopsy by the folks at AFIP but by someone connected to the FBI, which Clinton might not have been able to control. A car crash would also have involved civilian investigators who could not be ordered, as military people can be ordered, to do or not do something. But irregardless of how it was done, you still have to deal with what the experts in the case ... the forensic pathologists ... concluded.
