BeAChooser
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2007
- Messages
- 11,716
There were many guys in the Bush administration that knew that there was solid evidence that pointed to the fact that Saddam had no WMD.
Except that's not a fact. If Saddam had no WMD, why did he go to the trouble of sanitizing files, computers and facilities the ISG said were related to WMD? If Saddam had no WMD, then where did that binary sarin shell come from and why did the ISG say there might be others? If Saddam had no WMD, what was in the trucks that were seen going to Syria before the war? The ISG said they have credible sources that indicate they contained WMD related items. If Saddam had no WMD, why allow his regime to be toppled and himself to be tried and executed, when all he had to do was prove that to the UN inspectors from the start?
And by the way, the war wasn't just about whether Iraq had WMD anyway.