• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Israel will nuke Iran

Say No To Martial Law!

NeoRicen said:
You can't quote Prison Planet as fact...
Click to expand...


Why not? Everything he says is confirmed by multiple sources and the mainstream media.


Tell your handlers that there will be no stopping this revolution, Mr

 
If it's a large, but conventional warhead, then isn't it decidely not a "nuke"?

Or am I missing something?
 
And isn't the fact the US and Israel will go to the extra effort to develope non-nuclear solutions of any interterest to the blame-America-first crowd? How rabid is the rhetoric?
 
webfusion said:
I just read that Israel is set to procure from the USA a new type of conventional warhead, which delivers a punch similar to a nuclear blast, underground.

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/docs/m11171999_m177-99.htm

Details are sketchy, as the Israelis want to deploy their upgraded missiles/bombs with a minumum of 'fanfare' --- until they get to be used on the NATANZ site in Iran by IAF jets.
Click to expand...

We all saw it coming... With Iran wanting to wipe Israel of the map and all....
 
webfusion said:
I just read that Israel is set to procure from the USA a new type of conventional warhead, which delivers a punch similar to a nuclear blast, underground.

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/docs/m11171999_m177-99.htm

Details are sketchy, as the Israelis want to deploy their upgraded missiles/bombs with a minumum of 'fanfare' --- until they get to be used on the NATANZ site in Iran by IAF jets.
Click to expand...

If Israel actually wanted to nuke Iran, then I expect that they would have done so by now since Israel has had nuclear weapons for the last several years.
 
Oliver said:
Stop reading in the CT-Subforum. :D
So you appreciate these types of aggression?
Click to expand...

If by aggression you mean ridding the world of Saddam's nuke plant, then yeah, sure, I appreciate it.


Iran is free to have nuclear power, Oliver. We've very generously offered to supply them with all the fuel they could ever need.
 
Oliver- Saddam Hussein used chemical weapons against the Kurds and against the Iranians. Saddam Hussein also attacked Iran. Iraq was indeed a nation that could not be allowed to possess nukes...based on their aggressive and inhuman behavior. However, Iran has attacked no one, invaded no one, used chemical weapons on no one. Other then Ahmedinajad's stupid threats for PR purposes, Iran is not a threat to Israel.
 
parky76 said:
Oliver- Saddam Hussein used chemical weapons against the Kurds and against the Iranians. Saddam Hussein also attacked Iran. Iraq was indeed a nation that could not be allowed to possess nukes...based on their aggressive and inhuman behavior. However, Iran has attacked no one, invaded no one, used chemical weapons on no one. Other then Ahmedinajad's stupid threats for PR purposes, Iran is not a threat to Israel.
Click to expand...


I know - that's why I can't hear Politicians lying about a threat coming from Iran, especially because Iran's non-existing military power.

But as far I know, the destruction of the Iraqi reactor also didn't happen because a threat coming from there other than Israel wants to keep it's military power above every possible enemy. That's when Countries decide to declare enemies in advance, replace "Evildoer Regimes", invade sovereign countries, put embargos on these propagated threats and so on.

All in all - that's "Bully Politics" and I don't buy this crap any longer nor do I like this type of Behavior based on our so called "good", "modern", western Moral Standards.
 
jsiv said:
Iran is free to have nuclear power, Oliver. We've very generously offered to supply them with all the fuel they could ever need.
Click to expand...

So if they aren't willing to become completely dependent on the U.S., they can't develop nuclear energy?
 
JoeTheJuggler said:
So if they aren't willing to become completely dependent on the U.S., they can't develop nuclear energy?
Click to expand...


The fuel would likely come from Russia and not the US, but other than that, yes, you've got it about right.
 
JoeTheJuggler said:
So if they aren't willing to become completely dependent on the U.S., they can't develop nuclear energy?
Click to expand...
"Completely dependent"? Why does a country with such huge oil reserves need to worry about dependency on nuclear energy supplied from a foreign source? If they didn't have the oil you would have a point. The other problem is that Iran could easily crank up production of nuclear fuel in the event of a cut off. Most Western Nations would happily step up to the plate in the event Russia should cut off suplies. So, even without the oil I'm not sure it's a point.
 
RandFan said:
"Completely dependent"? Why does a country with such huge oil reserves need to worry about dependency on nuclear energy supplied from a foreign source? If they didn't have the oil you would have a point. The other problem is that Iran could easily crank up production of nuclear fuel in the event of a cut off. Most Western Nations would happily step up to the plate in the event Russia should cut off suplies. So, even without the oil I'm not sure it's a point.
Click to expand...
Iran feels that it needs nuclear weapons because their neighbors have them, because the U.S. made them afraid of invasion, and because the threat of invasion for their oil (if the west feels it really needs to for whatever reason) is very real.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom