Israel will nuke Iran

[geni]

Blah, blah blah. The US is the worlds military superpower. It doesn't need nuclear weapons.

Russia has Nukes as does China. Not unthinkable that they would be prepared to use them. Both have the capacity to hit the US with them. At the present time MAD (or at least Mutualy assured unacceptable levels of damage) appears to be the only viable stratergy for dealing with such a situation.

If Israel has nuclear bombs - of course it would be fair if Iran has them, too. Guess what: No one should have them. Your point ... ? But, but, but...

Israel is heavily outnumbered by the surrounding states that don't like it very much. It has been able to mentian conventional superiority so far but that may not continue to be the case. It has little interest in trying to dominate the middle east outside the degree that is needed to make sure it continues to exist. Israel's nuclear weapons appear to be a purely defensive measure at this time.

By comparision Iran has numbers on its side and while it's force projection capability is mostly limited to funding and arming various groups to further it's aims it defenisive ability is pretty darn impressive and likely to stay that way.

 

[Oliver]

OMG



Ok Oliver, one more time. Jesus mother mary of god.



Oliver: Provide evidence that Iran wants a bomb

2 hours later:

Oliver: That's what I said, it makes sense that Iran wants a bomb.

Ok Oliver, which side of your mouth are you talking out of?

Are you stupid???


1. Iran want the bomb.
2. It makes sense that Iran would like to have a bomb, too.
3. Iran officially confirmed that they want the bomb.
4. "Bush said Iran bad want bombs destroy world"

Do you spot ANY difference between these points above?

 

[RandFan]

Are you stupid???

Am I stupid? Are you kidding? I'm not the one who can't figure out what the hell I'm talking about.

1. Iran want the bomb.
2. It makes sense that Iran would like to have a bomb, too.
3. Iran officially confirmed that they want the bomb.
4. "Bush said Iran bad want bombs destroy world"

Do you spot ANY difference between these points above?

Yes, your dishonesty.

You asked to provide evidence that Iran wanted a nuclear bomb...

Right? RIGHT? RIGHT?

YES YOU DID!

I proved that they of course they did.

They had vast oil reserves.
They were offered nuclear fuel.
At anytime they could have started up their program.

I proved the point and you are just going around and around you are now just attacking me personally when you got caught and unlike me when I appologized for being wrong you haven't the decency to simply appologize and admit that you were wrong so you call me stupid and play some semantical game.

You were wrong. Grow a backbone and have the honesty to admit it.

 

[RandFan]

First of all: Provide evidence that Iran wants a bomb.

I did that, now act like a grown up and have the balls to admit it.

 

[RandFan]

I said:

Is it reasonable to believe that Iran wants to make a nuclear bomb?

You said:

Yeah, thats exactly what I said: "It would make sense to have the bomb".

You agree with me that it is reasonable for Iran to want to have a bomb based on logic and reason.

Now you are calling me stupid when you asked me to provide evidence that Iran wants a bomb. And you did that after playing games and pertending not to understand my point.

Huh?