Why is baby eating illegal?

No one seems to have mentioned the side note. Why can't we buy and eat abortus? I can't think of a specific reason.

Because it's unsanitary. Same reason it's a bad idea to feed cow remains to cows. Disease transmission is a real issue. Human body parts (aborted or not) are biohazards. You could no more buy amputated limbs for your barbeque.
 
Sorry you don't understand, point is more of what 'free' means. He is clearly showing that we are not truly 'free'. And I am merely pointing out that without certain restrictions your safety may be infringed upon. Does that make sense to you, or are you going to reference U.S. farm policy again (a winning argument for sure :rolleyes: ).

I don't see how that makes any point about what "free" means. As a general rule, freedom only goes as far as you are not impinging upon the rights of others. As a dead baby, the baby is not so much a human as a corpse, and has no more rights than a slab of pork or beef. A woman jogging through a park is most certainly alive and therefore has the same rights as any other live human.

If you really want to debate the rights of a corpse, please read Stiff by Mary Roach before you embark upon this rather unwieldy subject. I think she has written a very thorough and well researched book on the subject.
 
Because it's unsanitary. Same reason it's a bad idea to feed cow remains to cows. Disease transmission is a real issue. Human body parts (aborted or not) are biohazards. You could no more buy amputated limbs for your barbeque.

Amputated limbs! Why didn't I think of that?

As far as disease transmission, why are humans more biohazardous than pigs? Pigs are able to carry a vast majority of human-borne illnesses, and are rife with disease. I don't buy it. We just need to cook them as thoroughly as we cook pork and chicken and other highly diseased meats.
 
If human flesh was properly stored after slaughter, it wouldn't be any more disease infested than cow meat. However, I would probably want to ensure the human didn't have any serious diseases during it's life. I'm not sure if all diseases can be cooked out.
 
ok if you have a problem with fetus eating can we at least all agree that its ok to eat it if its your own?
 
We don't eat babies because of advanced ethical considerations: which wine would be appropriate to have with? Red, or white? The gourmands disagree, and in the face of such a conundrum, we abstain.
 
Because it's unsanitary. Same reason it's a bad idea to feed cow remains to cows. Disease transmission is a real issue. Human body parts (aborted or not) are biohazards. You could no more buy amputated limbs for your barbeque.

I am unconvinced that 1 baby a week is any more dangerous than 40 cigarettes a day, and unlike smoking it only harms the eater.

However, due to government hypocrisy only one of these is legal.

In the words of Roald Dahl
One baby a week is 52 a year,
Squish them, squash them,
Make them disappear!
 
My suspicion is, that in order ensure a decent supply, it would first be necessary to domesticate women.
 
As long as we're asking outrageous questions... here's one I'm curious about (from a legal standpoint)... as horrible as it was, in situations (historically, or in some weird nation) where rape was not a crime ... (for example, when it was not a crime to rape one's wife)... how much... er, "defense" was permissible on the part of the victim? Could the victim be charged with assault and battery if they fought off the rapist?

"Your honor, there I was, forcing my wife to have sex with me, when suddenly she stabbed me in the leg! I demand full prosecution!"
 
I believe that it has something to do with the Bishop of Bath and Wells.
 
My suspicion is, that in order ensure a decent supply, it would first be necessary to domesticate women.
That appears to be a matter of closing the barn door after the mare has run off with the palomino stallion. That said, and expanding upon your idea, your economic model would only pay when scaled, so that you'd need to run wench ranches. Furthermore, in order to upgrade the quality of the meat, you'd need to selectively breed them with men whose offspring tend to produce fleshy, well marbled babies.

I'm thinking big boned guys would be laying a lot of pipe.

THink of it: Ralph Cramden, stud hoss. Hell, Hoss Cartwright, stud hoss. John Candy, selling his seed for thousands per session.

The mind boggles.

DR
 
Supposedly the United States is the land of the free, but it doesn't feel all that free.

Why is it illegal to eat human babies? I mean, it's perfectly legal to eat baby chickens. And eggs, for that matter. Why can't we head on over to the local planned parenthood and pick up some abortus for breakfast?

Freedom my derriere...

Regulations on the disposal of medical waste.
 
I'm surprised to see that no one has hit upon the REAL reason why we can't eat dead babies: It's because the Dead Baby Jokes PAC has some of the most powerful lobbyists in Washington, and they have exerted enormous pressure on elected officials to perpetuate the taboo status of baby-eating. If the consumption of dead babies were to become acceptable to mainstream society, it would cause irreparable damage to the thriving dead baby joke industry, since the "shock value" of its products is derived almost exclusively from their detailed and often graphic depictions of culturally unacceptable practices involving dead babies.

For instance, if eating dead babies were legal, the following, two-part joke would completely lose its punch:

Q1) How do you get 100 dead babies into a bucket?
A1) With a blender!
Q2) How do you get them out again?
A2) With tortilla chips!

For these reasons, sadly, it's doubtful we will ever see the day when law-abiding citizens can visit their favorite bistro or delicatessen and dine on dead baby.

And don't even get me started on the Fart Jokes lobby, which has all but obliterated my chances of ever being able to fart loudly and proudly in board meetings, on first dates or at family funerals!
 
I'm surprised to see that no one has hit upon the REAL reason why we can't eat dead babies: It's because the Dead Baby Jokes PAC has some of the most powerful lobbyists in Washington, and they have exerted enormous pressure on elected officials to perpetuate the taboo status of baby-eating. If the consumption of dead babies were to become acceptable to mainstream society, it would cause irreparable damage to the thriving dead baby joke industry, since the "shock value" of its products is derived almost exclusively from their detailed and often graphic depictions of culturally unacceptable practices involving dead babies.

For instance, if eating dead babies were legal, the following, two-part joke would completely lose its punch:

Q1) How do you get 100 dead babies into a bucket?
A1) With a blender!
Q2) How do you get them out again?
A2) With tortilla chips!

For these reasons, sadly, it's doubtful we will ever see the day when law-abiding citizens can visit their favorite bistro or delicatessen and dine on dead baby.

And don't even get me started on the Fart Jokes lobby, which has all but obliterated my chances of ever being able to fart loudly and proudly in board meetings, on first dates or at family funerals!

I see. So, what about live babies? What's their lobby like?
 
Ok, so is this thread about:
1. Abortion?
2. Stem Cell Research?
3. Libertarianism?

Cause honestly, I can't tell.
 
I see. So, what about live babies? What's their lobby like?

Live babies used to have their own PAC, but ultimately it was disbanded because congressional leaders could not make sense of its gurgling, cooing demands.

ETA - I just remembered another reason for its downfall: The lobbyists used to cry a lot, but elected officials could never tell if they were unhappy with proposed legislation or were simply hungry, or needed their diapers changed.
 
Last edited:
Ok, so is this thread about:
1. Abortion?
2. Stem Cell Research?
3. Libertarianism?

Cause honestly, I can't tell.

It's pretty obvious, if you think about it. Zygar's planning a July 4th barbecue, and wanted to toss the idea out there and see what reactions he gets. So far they seem favorable. In a barbecue setting, we can avoid the aforementioned wine choice dilemma, and simply serve beer.
 

Back
Top Bottom