• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Moderated]175 did NOT hit the South tower.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rolfe said:
Aw, but some of us are having so much fun! And won't someone think of the kitties?

I'm still agog to find out just how much dosh is "loadsa", and how many "lorras" there are to "your" dollar.

In Manchester.

Rolfe.
Click to expand...
Is that Manchester England, or one of the Manchester's in the states ?
 
malcolm kirkman said:
I know what a verb transitive is. I suspect that until it turns up in Wikipedia, you'll never know. Then they can tell you anything, as they seem to have been doing for quite some years now.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...


As the phrase is, "transitive verb," not "verb transitive," permit us to speculate that you really don't know what most of us learned in the sixth grade. A verb that requires a direct object is a transitive verb: I hit the ball. No mystery there.

This detour has been as irrelevant as Rockefeller to your deranged fantasy about nonexistent military "bad boys." I notice that you NEVER respond to the substance of my posts. Gee, what could be the reason for your reluctance?
 
For the love of God, Malcolm, you have 93 posts per day! You're worse than LUCUS from the Loose Change forum. Or is this LUCUS from the Loose Change forum? Either way, why don't you relax, push away from the computer and get some fresh air.


ETA: My suspicion was confirmed. 190 posts in two days...all in this thread.
 
Last edited:
Civilized Worm said:
So why did they go through with it when something could - and did - go wrong?

That was your arguement, remember?
Click to expand...
Because they thought they could get away with it. Just as they thought they'd got away with OKC.
That's why people commit crimes, they think they can get away with it.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
Because they thought they could get away with it. Just as they thought they'd got away with OKC.
That's why people commit crimes, they think they can get away with it.
Click to expand...
so why would this prevent islamic terrorists from hijacking planes if there was a chance chuck norris was on board?
 
Mince said:
For the love of God, Malcolm, you have 93 posts per day!
Click to expand...
I throw a bucket full of cold water over myself, then I give myself a rub down with a mackerel. You should try it, really sets you up for the day.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
Four independent photos and videos show pods.
I'm sure you would like EVERYONE to not only abandon pods, but also throw in the towel on the mass murder of thousands of innocent civilians.
You'll be conversant with the legal term 'accessory after the fact', will you?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...



There were NO "pods." It was an effect of LIGHTING. NOBODY believes that there were "pods."
 
Rolfe said:
Aw, but some of us are having so much fun! And won't someone think of the kitties?
Click to expand...

It's like a casino. Every few hours I have to remind you how long you've been at it, and how little ground you've actually gained in the quicksand that is a immature paranoid CTers so-called brain.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
Are you in the states ?
You can buy a house in Detroit, for the price of a car.
Which is worth more at the moment, the dollar or the peso ?
Click to expand...
You really do need to get out more, don't you?

As Mince just observed, all posts not just in this forum, but in this thread.

Rolfe. :c1:
 
defaultdotxbe said:
so why would this prevent islamic terrorists from hijacking planes if there was a chance chuck norris was on board?
Click to expand...

Moslems didn't do it, neocons did. You know who I mean, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld etc. All dancing to Rockefellers tune of course.
 
I finally caught up, and then realised that it wasn't worth it. In fact I don't understand why Malcolms even here, by his own standards 9/11 never happened and there is no war in Iraq. Why, because Cheney says it did and that there is, and since according to Malcolm everything Cheney says is a lie, 9/11 never happened and there cannot be a war in Iraq. QED.

As such there is no point in carry on the topic since nothing could have hit the WTC (Cheney claims something did) and the Buildings never fell down (Cheney claims that they did) and the US then never invaded Afghanistan (another Cheney lie) or Iraq (Cheney again.)

Well that takes care of that.

Oh, except that the 81st floor (where the plane hit) wasn't a "computer floor". It was the Offices of Fuji Bank Limited, and in particular the office of Stanley Praimnath, who somehow miraculously survived the collision when it killed everyone else in his office. I guess it must have been the missile that hit his office first that didn't kill him.....
 
malcolm kirkman said:
Moslems didn't do it, neocons did. You know who I mean, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld etc. All dancing to Rockefellers tune of course.
Click to expand...
wrong.jpg
http://pics.xbehome.com/albums/userpics/10001/wrong.jpg
 
malcolm kirkman said:
"Do the orders still stand"?
"Of course they do, have you heard anything to the contrary"?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...


The "orders," as all but the most obtuse conspiracy liars understand, were the SHOOT-DOWN orders recently communicated by Bush to Cheney.

The alternative is to believe that Cheney, in front of several witnesses, demanded that a hijacked plane be allowed to crash into a government building. Interestingly, not a single reporter thought there was a story here. I suppose that all those Bush-bashing journalists are secret pawns of Rockefeller/Rothschild, eh?
 
malcolm kirkman said:
I throw a bucket full of cold water over myself, then I give myself a rub down with a mackerel. You should try it, really sets you up for the day.
Click to expand...


Nine more posts and you'll be at the crucial and triumphant 100 posts per day mark. Carry on my wayward son.
 
Well, it's after midnight in Merrye Olde, and by yon counter on the wall, we're nearing Post 1000, and not a single shred of evidence has been offered by Malcolm in the Muddle.

It's time to concede DavidJayJordan style. Having any sort of discussion on evidence with this type is like debating the causes of the Whiskey Rebellion with a hydrangea bush.

At this point, I'm calling out the Pirates and Cute Chinese Chix.





ETA: Wooo! I timed it so I'd hit the 1000th post in the thread!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom