[Moderated]175 did NOT hit the South tower.

[Belz...]

That's why the twins went UP, before they came down.
Anything going UP, has to be blown UP.

Oh, this is going to be good. Please link to a video showing the twin towers going UP.

Here's a quick re-check. Yes, definately stuff going up.

Ah! You mean you don't know anything about physics, either ?

Of course y'all know all this. When are y'all going to stop pussyfooting around and try and patch together a viable hijack scenario?
Or are y'all just palying for time, trying to work some nonsense scenario out?

Well, if you didn't start calling us all shills at one point I would've been worried.

You have all singularily failed to involve airport security, save to say that they would allow GPS and boxcutters on board without a backward glance.

Please try to think pre-9/11, not post-.

You know very well that the supposed hijackers couldn't fly a kite.

Is there ANY sentence you can utter without being uttery wrong ?

Maybe you're all neocon gatekeepers eh.

What the ****'s a neocon, anyway ?

How can a fact be incorrect?

It can't, which should tell you something about your OP.

WTC 7 fell due to impact damage?
What hit it, a strong wind?

No, a 110-storey building.

There were no hijacks. It's all eyewash.

And that's because... it wasn't 100% sure to succeed ? What about all previous hijackings in aviation history ? Never happened ?

 

[JimBenArm]

I am sure Shakespeare, Conrad, Hawthorne, etc... would love to hear that you find their works "childish". Your statement, in and of itself, is a childish one.

You are obviously a troll, and if it were not a slow week, we might grow bored with your old, debunked, ignorant claims, but, like a cat needing a ball of wool, I must be amused. While I find fiction far from childish, I am currently without a favorite book, so for now your posts will be my ball of wool.

TAM

Yeah, ain't he just the cutest? Haven't had one like this since 28K!

 

[HyJinX]

...

 

[Mobyseven]

Before you tell me how the hijack was planned and prepped, you won't mind explaining how a fibreglass nosed plane punches it's way through a corrugated steel wall. Then how aluminum wings can cut through steel.

A few posts ago, you were telling us that it was a special military plane that hit the WTC, and that was how it got through the wall.

Now you're saying it was a standard 757, but it had a missile in a pod.

We should put a sign up over the forums saying "One conspiracy theory per person at any one time."

 

[Daald]

We have to get on the NWO secure line and ask Cheney to proclaim that Malcolm here is real so that he ceases to exist.

 

[Myriad]

Malcolm, your theory has gaping holes in it. You have not addressed the crucial Foreign Relations issue, nor the implications of your Domino Theory. Recall that in Thunderball, Domino is the sister of a U.S. Air Force officer who participates in a plot to steal nuclear weapons. She's a sister living abroad, which makes her a foreign relation. Are your eyes beginning to open now?

For your theory to be accepted by a jury of your peers, you must explain the role of Largo and SPECTRE in the plot. Also, was James Bond working on the same side as Chuck Norris? Note that Fu Manchu is a an Asian who was found by Sir Denis Nayland Smith ("Found Asian" = "Foundation" --coincidence? No.), and many foundation garments worn by broads abroad like Domino are manufactured in Asia, so his role must be considered as well.

Respectfully,
Myriad

 

[T.A.M.]

I am still waiting for my cheque from Neo-Con Central. It should be a big one this month, given the dual hit of Rosie and Charlie.

TAM

 

[SOMERLED]

It's a good thing the tide is turning. I was sick of being stuck on the shoals. Maybe now, we can stop the reporters from shooting all the students just so they can report on stuff!
That is what you meant, isn't it?

Exactly,
Check this out, don't you just love the "mostly due to structural failure" bit?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3U_GISl3aAA
Even some of the posters on here, could have done a better job than this clown.

 

[JimBenArm]

Exactly,
Check this out, don't you just love the "mostly due to structural failure" bit?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3U_GISl3aAA
Even some of the posters on here, could have done a better job than this clown.

Clowns? Are we going to the circus, next? Unka Malcolm, you are too good to me!
Can I sit on your lap, now?

 

[Arus808]

Exactly,
Check this out, don't you just love the "mostly due to structural failure" bit?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3U_GISl3aAA
Even some of the posters on here, could have done a better job than this clown.

another 911 conpsiracy video with no facts to back up their claims

when are you going to provide evidence malcolm
after 135 posts, you should have at least bead the odds that a post with evidence would show up.

oh wait.

we had a 10,000 post thread by another member, who had never shown evidence of his claims...

 

[Belz...]

Occum's razor is a favoured term on the net.

Careful not to cut yourself.

I've seen a doctored police photo of WTC7.

Ah! Well, could you show us how you can tell it was doctored ?

Pine needles penetrate steel do they?
Fibreglass or wood travelling at 400mph will penetrate steel.
There are none as numb as those that wanna be.

This is the equivalent of chanting "la la la, I can't hear you."

Have you ever SEEN the effects in question ?

Just the one obvious claim.
175 did not hit the south tower.

Well, that's it, then.

A 57 storey skyscraper dropped like a shot cow.

Remember when I asked if you could say ONE sentence without being wrong ? It's 47 Stories.

What more evidence do you need.
Maybe WTC7 came down in sympathy ,eh.

If I were a 47-storey skyscraper and a 110-storey flaming one fell partially on me, I'd probably fall, too. Unless you contend that it didn't because it wasn't 100% sure that it would fall...

There are many types of evidence. I suppose they start at a 'hunch'.

Yeah, I think this is where your problem lies.

"Mum, this is Mark Bingham, you believe me don't you"?

Again, you've obviously never been in a life-threatning situation, you jerk.

Like knowing it takes weeks to fit demo charges in a buiding.

More like months; IF the building is unoccupied and emptied of all non-structural material.

Like knowing a demo job when you see one.

Well, I'd think that structural engineers, architects and demo experts would probably be better at this than you.

I don't need vetted evidence, I just need to suspect it.

We've gone from a boxcutter to a knife now have we.

You mean you've never seen a boxcutter ? I wouldn't want to get on the bad end of one, myself.

 

[JimBenArm]

another 911 conpsiracy video with no facts to back up their claims

when are you going to provide evidence malcolm
after 135 posts, you should have at least bead the odds that a post with evidence would show up.

oh wait.

we had a 10,000 post thread by another member, who had never shown evidence of his claims...

The resemblance is uncanny, isn't it? Like brothers, they are!

 

[SOMERLED]

Malcolm, your theory has gaping holes in it. You have not addressed the crucial Foreign Relations issue, nor the implications of your Domino Theory. Recall that in Thunderball, Domino is the sister of a U.S. Air Force officer who participates in a plot to steal nuclear weapons. She's a sister living abroad, which makes her a foreign relation. Are your eyes beginning to open now?

For your theory to be accepted by a jury of your peers, you must explain the role of Largo and SPECTRE in the plot. Also, was James Bond working on the same side as Chuck Norris? Note that Fu Manchu is a an Asian who was found by Sir Denis Nayland Smith ("Found Asian" = "Foundation" --coincidence? No.), and many foundation garments worn by broads abroad like Domino are manufactured in Asia, so his role must be considered as well.

Respectfully,
Myriad

You are confusing Blofelt with Cheney. Blofelt is real, Cheney is a figment of Rockefeller's imagination.
This won't do, you must not confuse facts with conjecture.

 

[Belz...]

Coming down in it's own footprint is a fact.

Then why were big chunks of it on other side of the street ?

Only buildings dropped by controlled demolition come down in their own footprint.

Ergo, WTC7 came down by controlled demolition.

Yeah, the syllogism is valid but not sound. Guess why.

You are confusing me with moslems.

Yes. Muslims and Karma. Must remember this.

To overcome the MSM's obvious support for mass murder and to let neocons know that the tide is turning.

You can do better than that by actually answering my points.

 

[Arus808]

malcom, please keep it to one topic; cheney and rummsfeld have nothing to do with your claim that flight 175 did not hit the south tower.

you need to stay on point; and i hope that everyone else keeps to that as well. He seems to want ot change his story as the thread goes on; treat him like Christophera; nail him on ONE thing only.

 

[Belz...]

You are confusing Blofelt with Cheney. Blofelt is real, Cheney is a figment of Rockefeller's imagination.
This won't do, you must not confuse facts with conjecture.

Well now I KNOW you're just trolling, buck.

 

[Belz...]

malcom, please keep it to one topic; cheney and rummsfeld have nothing to do with your claim that flight 175 did not hit the south tower.

you need to stay on point

Seriously, I don't think he can.

He's easily the most ignorant truther I've ever seen here. He knows NOTHING about 9/11, physics, history, sociology, psychology, or anything else for that matter.

In order to make himself look like less of a fool, he's bound to try and spew as many different falsehoods as possible so as to ensure that none of us can succesfully debunk every one of them while he's just dancing around looking for more.

At least he's funny. But depressing, all the same.

 

[SOMERLED]

Why not? Please list your reasons as to why you think it improbable to impossible for the aircraft to have been navigated to New York City.

If you are anything like your photograph, you'll have some experience of lifting a baby out of a pushchair. Maybe your sister's or a friend's baby.
Now lift a 16 stone man out of a chair and we'll take it from there.

 

[T.A.M.]

Staying on topic for any longer than 2-3 posts would violate Section V subsection (i) of the truther code, which states...

...when involved in discussion or teaching of the 9/11 truth mantra, do not linger on any one point for more than a few sentences. Doing so will reveal the lack of evidence behind it, and may cause you to lose your victim/student through his or her use of logic or reasoning skills.

TAM

 

[Marquis de Carabas]

If you are anything like your photograph, you'll have some experience of lifting a baby out of a pushchair. Maybe your sister's or a friend's baby.
Now lift a 16 stone man out of a chair and we'll take it from there.

P Corsair115 cannot lift a 16 stone man out of a chair.
C Therefore, aircraft navigation to NYC is impossible.

It's so clear now.