• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Moderated]175 did NOT hit the South tower.

Status
Not open for further replies.
catcar.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v295/Jaye77/catcar.jpg
 
T.A.M. said:
Malcolm is like ACE Baker and Pdoh all wrapped into one package. He has the insaneness of ACE, with the mean/sourpuss streak of PDoh...makes for an interesting and entertaining 18 pages...

Okay, I know you will likely say it is up to the rest of the world to prove their case, but I am asking you now, Malcolm, show us one shred of vetted evidence that any of the BS you have provided here is true.

Thanks in advance

TAM:)
Click to expand...
There are many types of evidence. I suppose they start at a 'hunch'. Something said to you just doesn't sound right.
Like,
"Mum, this is Mark Bingham, you believe me don't you"?
You can go from that to a 'smoking gun' = flat out, clear evidence.
Such as a 57 storey steel building dropping like a shot cow.
Like knowing it takes weeks to fit demo charges in a buiding. Like knowing a demo job when you see one.
Then you look at why everybody else can't see it and you realise that of course, they can. People like O'Reilly.
I don't need vetted evidence, I just need to suspect it.
Now you explain to me, what brought WTC7 down.
What are you going to call it, the domino effect?
Dominoes have no foundations.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
There are many types of evidence. I suppose they start at a 'hunch'. Something said to you just doesn't sound right.
Like,
"Mum, this is Mark Bingham, you believe me don't you"?
You can go from that to a 'smoking gun' = flat out, clear evidence.
Such as a 57 storey steel building dropping like a shot cow.
Like knowing it takes weeks to fit demo charges in a buiding. Like knowing a demo job when you see one.
Then you look at why everybody else can't see it and you realise that of course, they can. People like O'Reilly.
I don't need vetted evidence, I just need to suspect it.
Now you explain to me, what brought WTC7 down.
What are you going to call it, the domino effect?
Dominoes have no foundations.
Click to expand...
Malcolm, this is Jim, you believe me, don't you? You didn't answer me. Are we best friends now? It hurts my feelings when you don't answer me.
Why did you shoot the cow? What did it do, eat your lawn? And why did you wet on your evidence? Now no one will want to look at it, it's all ickey and yellow!
WTC7 was brought down by people telling it it was overweight and would never get a man. Severe depression. Don't you feel guilty for telling it that now?
My wife likes to play dominoes. Mexican Train is the game they play. You should try it. And we know dominoes don't have foundations. They have trust funds, silly!
Your new friend,
Jim
 
malcolm kirkman said:
There are many types of evidence. I suppose they start at a 'hunch'. Something said to you just doesn't sound right.
Like,
"Mum, this is Mark Bingham, you believe me don't you"?
You can go from that to a 'smoking gun' = flat out, clear evidence.
Such as a 57 storey steel building dropping like a shot cow.
Like knowing it takes weeks to fit demo charges in a buiding. Like knowing a demo job when you see one.
Then you look at why everybody else can't see it and you realise that of course, they can. People like O'Reilly.
I don't need vetted evidence, I just need to suspect it.
Now you explain to me, what brought WTC7 down.
What are you going to call it, the domino effect?
Dominoes have no foundations.
Click to expand...


1. Alice Hoglan, has for the record, explained that Mark would often answer the phone in the way he did, or would address people this way when he called. She stated this in an interview.

2. Unless you have seen a building struck by huge chunk(s) of debris, leaving a 20 storey hole in its side, and left with uncontrolled fires for 7 hours, that did not collapse this way, you have NO PRECEDENT to say it should not have collapsed this way. It was 47 storeys high, not 57.

3. Will you tell the procecutor, when and if you are accused of a crime, that he doesnt need to have vetted evidence to convict you, just a gut feeling and instinct about whether you "did it" or not?

4. NIST has explained, in their interim report on WTC7, the most probable cause of collapse. Please point out where it is wrong, or where you disagree with it, and why, or else you have your answer.


TAM:)
 
Last edited:
I don't need vetted evidence, I just need to suspect it.
Click to expand...

Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner.

From what has been stated by M in this thread he needs no evidence, he needs no technical knowledge, he needs no science knowledge, all he needs is his own suspicions and that qualifies anything he states as fact.
 
T.A.M. said:
3. Will you tell the procecutor, when and if you are accused of a crime, that he doesnt need to have vetted evidence to convict you, just a gut feeling and instict about whether you "did it" or not?


TAM:)
Click to expand...


Interestingly this evidence based on suspicion is exactly what has gotten many police officers and prosecution attorneys in deep doo-doo when it is later found that they had jailed (or worse) an innocent person.
 
JimBenArm said:
Malcolm, this is Jim, you believe me, don't you? You didn't answer me. Are we best friends now? It hurts my feelings when you don't answer me.
Why did you shoot the cow? What did it do, eat your lawn? And why did you wet on your evidence? Now no one will want to look at it, it's all ickey and yellow!
WTC7 was brought down by people telling it it was overweight and would never get a man. Severe depression. Don't you feel guilty for telling it that now?
My wife likes to play dominoes. Mexican Train is the game they play. You should try it. And we know dominoes don't have foundations. They have trust funds, silly!
Your new friend,
Jim
Click to expand...
Thanks very much for those comforting words, Jim. You've just restored my faith in human nature. I see Rockefeller has just started up a new charity, it's aim is to hand out maps to Iraq to Palestinians who've just had their homes bulldozed. Shall we each put in a few bucks? Sounds like a worthy cause, what do you think?
 
malcolm kirkman said:
What are you going to call it, the domino effect?
Dominoes have no foundations.
Click to expand...

Wrong again. Domino was played by Claudine Auger in the original Thunderball, and by Kim Basinger in the unofficial remake Never Say Never Again. If you Google for photographs, you will clearly see that both of them obviously possess substantial foundation garments.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
jaydeehess said:
Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner.

From what has been stated by M in this thread he needs no evidence, he needs no technical knowledge, he needs no science knowledge, all he needs is his own suspicions and that qualifies anything he states as fact.
Click to expand...
Not quite,
WTC7 coming down is a fact.
Coming down likea shot cow, is my description of controlled demolition.
Coming down in it's own footprint is a fact.
Only buildings dropped by controlled demolition come down in their own footprint.
Ergo, WTC7 came down by controlled demolition.
The day a jury agrees, is the day society will accept it as a fact.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
"Mum, this is Mark Bingham, you believe me don't you"?
Click to expand...

Given HIS OWN MOTHER confirmed it was him, I'm going to say no, not suspicious. Had she not confirmed it and the conversation went something like:

"Mum [cough][cough] thus iss Mark [sneeze][cough]Bingham, hew [cough][cough] beweev muh don chew[cough]?" well then you may have a case.
 
Malcolm, as punishment for falsely accusing innocent people of mass murder, Karma may require you to eventually be accused of a crime you didn't commit but convicted nonetheless simply by hearsay, conjecture, and 'gut feeling' with no compelling physical evidence or eye witnesses accounts at all.

Wouldn't that just suck big time?
 
malcolm kirkman said:
Thanks very much for those comforting words, Jim. You've just restored my faith in human nature. I see Rockefeller has just started up a new charity, it's aim is to hand out maps to Iraq to Palestinians who've just had their homes bulldozed. Shall we each put in a few bucks? Sounds like a worthy cause, what do you think?
Click to expand...
I think we should. Maybe we could help out by bulldozing some houses, so they have people to give the maps to. I volunteer your house. Then you would have to come live with me! Yay!
Your new friend;
Jim
 
T.A.M. said:
1. Alice Hoglan, has for the record, explained that Mark would often answer the phone in the way he did, or would address people this way when he called. She stated this in an interview.

2. Unless you have seen a building struck by huge chunk(s) of debris, leaving a 20 storey hole in its side, and left with uncontrolled fires for 7 hours, that did not collapse this way, you have NO PRECEDENT to say it should not have collapsed this way. It was 47 storeys high, not 57.

3. Will you tell the procecutor, when and if you are accused of a crime, that he doesnt need to have vetted evidence to convict you, just a gut feeling and instinct about whether you "did it" or not?

4. NIST has explained, in their interim report on WTC7, the most probable cause of collapse. Please point out where it is wrong, or where you disagree with it, and why, or else you have your answer.


TAM:)
Click to expand...
I've already answered with regard to Govt reports on 9/11. I don't like to read fiction, I find it childish.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom