Any hijack involves risks. The crew might not behave, the passengers might not behave. The area might be completely clouded in. NYC itself might be covered in clouds. The govt flight paths show a track like a drunken chicken. Yet all I hear on here is GPS.
which they had. And they had VOR and Autopilot and a compass and eyes.... all of which they also had.
Was the cabin door locked? Posters on here ignore stuff like that.
It hasn't been ignored at all. It's already been pointed out that doors were rarely locked pre-9/11 and that even if it was, a) they aren't that hard to open physically, and b) A knife to the stewardess' throat works wonders at getting doors opened.
They even deny pre planted explosives.
You haven't even come close to having proven preplanted explosives, and nor has any of the rest of the so called Truth movement.
They're "having a laugh" = not serious.
That's because it's impossible to take you seriously. You know nothing about what happened that day, you have no evidence, and yet you continue to make claims that Killtown would find embarrassing. The only thing left to do is to laugh at you. That's what people do when faced with clowns or the village idiot.
There were no hijacks. It's all eyewash.
You just keep telling yourself that, one day you might even believe it.
It was a planned operation.
Yes it was planned, by Al Qaeda. That's why they made the Hijackers go through their training camp and specifically trained them in hijacking a plane, then sent them to flight school until they had enough skill to actually get their Commerical Pilots' Licences.
The first thing to go, when planning would be any imponderacles, such as passengers and crew reactions etc. Occum's razor is a favoured term on the net.
So no one has ever managed to plan out and actually hijack a plane, ever?
The planes had to hit and had to hit both towers.
Only in your warped version. In reality while that was certainly the goal, them hitting any building in Mathatten would have sufficed for the result the hijackers wanted to achive.
You wouldn't risk something going wrong.
Only in your warped version. In reality they hijacked 4 planes with 19 well trained men so that the odds were that even in a worse case senario, at least one would go sorta right. When you're a terrorist you only have to get one of four right and you win.
Like trusting an arab who couldn'tfly to get a plane to NYC in maybe thick cloud.
Which is why you use ones that all have FAA commerical pilots' licences. Do you think that you can get one of those out a corn flakes package, or might you have to actually be able to fly to a certain standard to get one? And what wrong with using an Arab anyway? Are you suggesting they are incapable of flying a plane or are untrustworthy or something?
It's past my bedtime. Tomorrow, I'll check out some other threads and see what makes this forum tick.
It ticks on Critical thinking, something you seem to be severly lacking in.
