• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Moderated]175 did NOT hit the South tower.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why couldn't the 175 passengers and crew been herded on to a remote controlled plane and flown off to somewhere like The Bering Sea?
would be flown through the air? if so p3 of the first set applies

did the aircraft designated UA175 ever belong to united airlines? if so, see the second set
 
I suspect you are right. I see that Malcolm has gone silent on the planes can't penetrate steel arguments, nor acknowledged that water is routinely used to cut steal, Cesna's can break through walls of high rise buildings or that kamakaize planes did go through the decks and hulls of ships.
You won't mind coming up with a reasonable 'hijack' scenario that gets 175 from Logan to NY, will you?
 
He got hijacked by a band of night clubbing CIAduh deadlegs did he?
One of your bones of contention has been that it is difficult, if not impossible, to have navigated the aircraft to the WTC. Mr. Rust's escapade shows that it is entirely possible to fly an aircraft long distances without a great deal of sophisticated navigational equipment aboard it.

Heck, B-17s were flying missions hundreds of miles long in WWII without the benefit of modern-day technologies such as GPS. Those long missions of sixty-plus years ago were performed using very basic navigational techniques.
 
One of your bones of contention has been that it is difficult, if not impossible, to have navigated the aircraft to the WTC. Mr. Rust's escapade shows that it is entirely possible to fly an aircraft long distances without a great deal of sophisticated navigational equipment aboard it.

Heck, B-17s were flying missions hundreds of miles long in WWII without the benefit of modern-day technologies such as GPS. Those long missions of sixty-plus years ago were performed using very basic navigational techniques.
Your hijack scenario?
 
No, but you are the man who claims to have a simple scenario that explains how 9/11 was an inside job. However, your simple scenario is riddled with holes big enough to fly a 767 through.
Your hijack scenario?
 
Do you even bother reading this thread? Are you as blithering idoit? Has someone removed you brain so that your skull is nothing but an ornate vase for daffidols?

I have already posted, and several other people have also posted, very reasonable hijack senarios.

YOU KEEP FRICKEN IGNORING THEM!!!!
 
Do you even bother reading this thread? Are you as blithering idoit? Has someone removed you brain so that your skull is nothing but an ornate vase for daffidols?

I have already posted, and several other people have also posted, very reasonable hijack senarios.

YOU KEEP FRICKEN IGNORING THEM!!!!

It will probably continued to be ignored.

If the evidence doesn't suit the theorists' contention, then it is most likely it will be ignored.
 
Really? You're a submariner? Really and truly? Which one? When were you on board? What was your homeport? When did you get your dolphins?

Not that I think you're lying again.
I sais I was a deckhand on a submarine.
It's called humour or humor to you.
Either way, you're sadly lacking in it.
 
Wow.

Planes that splat like bugs on buildings, zeros couldnt punch though a wooden deck because they didnt have a pointed nose.:boggled:

I had to come out of lurker mode Malcom to tell you, outta the moonbat crazy stuff ive read on the net. Your posts are one of the few that actually sent waves of stupidity through my moniter to crash against my brain.

I really hope you are a troll screwing around. Cause if your not, you are the most delusional and undereducated person I have ever met.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom