May 2007 Stundie Nominations

LUCUS has a brilliant plan:
There is nothing wrong, for instance, in simply asking those in control of thermate supply whether any of it was used on 9/11.

Similarly, those who suspect DEW [Directed Energy Weapons] should ask DEW-keepers whether or not DEW were used to destroy the WTC.
Click to expand...
This should get extra points for the multiple layers of Stundieness.
 
gumboot said:
DEW-keepers? Are they like bee-keepers? :confused:

-Gumboot
Click to expand...
I don't know. But I'm pretty sure a Colombian crime syndicate controls the thermate supply. Just last week a guy was caught smuggling 5 kilos of powdered aluminum across the border, hidden up his bum.
 
don't know if it's permitted but i'd like to nominate judy wood's whole new effort HERE the complete site is just one huge stupifying stundification................

BV
 
bonavada said:
don't know if it's permitted but i'd like to nominate judy wood's whole new effort HERE the complete site is just one huge stupifying stundification................

BV
Click to expand...



Her glossary of terms deserves a life time achievement award. It's a work of art.

-Gumboot
 
chipmunk stew said:
LUCUS has a brilliant plan:

This should get extra points for the multiple layers of Stundieness.
Click to expand...

Man Moby you're going to have a hell of time trying to decide which of LUCAS' is up for the final nomination. That one is a doozy though.

Gumboot said:
Her glossary of terms deserves a life time achievement award. It's a work of art.
Click to expand...

Judy Woods said:
Shaving Cream See: Alka-Seltzer
Click to expand...

That woman is twenty four carats of crazy.
 
Unsecured Coins said:
a follow up to that one

teh Stundie said:
I mean as in Earths Elements as in Earth, Wind and Fire
Click to expand...

sometimes, the jokes just write themselves
http://screwloosechange.xbehome.com/index.php?showtopic=1799&st=20&#entry21835
Click to expand...

Teh saga continues...

HeyLeroy@SLCF said:
It would've been helpful had you mentioned that you were talking about medieval scientific principles.
teh Stundie said:
If you wasn't aware that earth, wind, fire and water were the 4 basic elements...then thats not my problem.
Click to expand...
link
Click to expand...
1193546L.gif
 
HeyLeroy said:
Teh saga continues...


[qimg]http://liveu-46.vo.llnwd.net/vidilife/image/2006/10/10/946639/1193546L.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...

That might make sense in a literary or historical context, but not when he's presuming to expound on modern day scientific and technical matters.
 
bonavada said:
don't know if it's permitted but i'd like to nominate judy wood's whole new effort HERE the complete site is just one huge stupifying stundification................

BV
Click to expand...

It is not permitted. However, if you would like to nominate something specific I can consider it. I'll also accept nominations from that site during June.

Also...

gumboot said:
Her glossary of terms deserves a life time achievement award. It's a work of art.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

I will certainly consider this.

8den said:
Man Moby you're going to have a hell of time trying to decide which of LUCAS' is up for the final nomination. That one is a doozy though.
Click to expand...

Tell me about it. There's a definite front runner at the moment, but that could easily change as I've forgotten what some of his earlier nom's WERE.

I'll keep you in suspense as to what the frontrunner is though...;)
 
Mobyseven said:
It is not permitted. However, if you would like to nominate something specific I can consider it. I'll also accept nominations from that site during June.
Click to expand...


I think this one sums up the crazy quite well:


Who threw the big rocks through the window? Actually, we can prove this one is staged! Note the big piece of glass to make it look like the window was busted by the rocks? Rocks tumble. Where are the rocks supposed to be from? The WTC didn't have a "Hokie stone" facade. (I think you know what that is, now.) So, where did such thick rocks come from?
Click to expand...


This seems to be discussing this photo:

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/dust/3885.jpg


about one quarter down this page:

http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/dirt3.html


I have no idea what rock, or window, she is discussing. This goes beyond even her "nanodust" nonsense, since at least in those photos, other people can see some dust....


"Thick rocks"? :rolleyes:


ETA: She might have been discussing this photo:

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/dust/3918.jpg

Which at least has windows in it, but I still can't see the "rocks". Someone needs to teach her how to format a page so people know what the frack she's talking about...
 
Last edited:
Belz... said:
Sometimes it's hard to believe that these aren't parodies...
Click to expand...
Who knows?

mania continues his/her post with this description of skeptics:
It may be tough to enforce some of these in your code of conduct, but here are a few of the most obvious symptoms of pathological skepticism: constantly "moving the goalposts", circular reasoning, "majority-always-rules" outlook on science, extreme closed-mindedness, intellectually dishonest reasoning, inability to admit they may have been incorrect about anything, all forms of character assassination & name-calling (as previously mentioned).
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom