defaultdotxbe
Drunken Shikigami
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2006
- Messages
- 7,474
he actually felt the need specifically point out that he wasnt talking about them, lolEarth wind and fire?
I think he's talking about the band.![]()
he actually felt the need specifically point out that he wasnt talking about them, lolEarth wind and fire?
I think he's talking about the band.![]()
For DEW, I'd suggest the Directed Energy Directorate of the Air Force Research Laboratory.And who would those in control be by chance?
The National Thermate Council?
The American Association of Directed Energy Weapons?
For DEW, I'd suggest the Directed Energy Directorate of the Air Force Research Laboratory.
I'm sure they'll be glad to answer all his questions. *muffled guffaw*
Here's an answer to DEW supporters received from the DIRECTED ENERGY DIRECTORATE located at Kirtland AFB, NM, home of the Air Force Research Lab and neighbor of Los Alamos and of Sandia and other top secret military installations.
"MESSAGE: I received your fax yesterday and your FedEx package today, and had a chance to review the materials you sent. During our telephone conversation I outlined a variety of directed energies that might have future weapons applications but I'm not aware of any that are mature enough to cause the damage at the World Trade Center. Lasers are the most likely candidates for nearer-term weapons use and, to that enc, we have conducted laboratory tests to evaluate the effects of laser energy on different materials. For the most part, those materials have been metals, not concrete structures. Effects on metals are from the heat generated by an intense beam of coherent light, which cause the metals to weaken and split. Given sufficient heat, metals would melt (become liquids) and, given significantly more heat, could turn to gases. Since we haven't tested concrete I don't know if the effect would be dust. You report phenomena that we cannot explain here, either because we don't have enough data or because the phenomena are not within our area of expertise. While on a personal level I may find Dr Wood's investigation interesting and worthy of further consideration, on a professional level we are unable to devote our limited resources to activities outside of our charter, I wish you success in your endeavor and am available to answer whatever directed energy questions may arise.
Respectfully,
JUVEISTTINO R GARCÍA
Director of Public Affairs
Directed Energy Directorate
Air Force Research Laboratory
Kirtland AFB, NM 87117-6776"
In my opinion, it is very TELLING, indeed, that the Director of Public Affairs of the DIRECTED ENERGY DIRECTORATE does NOT deny that DEW were used on 9/11 and, further, he invites other communications from DEW supporters.
Teh Stundie @ SLCF said:You assume that gravity is pulling the object at 9.81m/s. but you forgot to account for something called acceleration!
its a good month for stundie
Teh man said:You assume that gravity is pulling the object at 9.81m/s. but you forgot to account for something called acceleration!

Notice--Weight is force--then he goes somewhere...Weight is the force on an object due to gravity, calculated by m*g, the mass times the acceleration due to gravity. In a rotating reference frame, like being in orbit, this is balanced by an inertial force ('pseudo force'/'centrifugal force' if you like), so objects feel weightless. Proper weightless would require being very far away from any significant amount of gravity. It's not obvious if you are just moving around in the space shuttle, or on earth, but it makes a big difference if you want to change orbits.
A bullet has a pointed tip, a soft nosed fireglass fronted plane doesn't.
In WW2, the Japs made the mistake of sending Kamikaze planes against the wooden decks of US carriers. They forgot to put a pointy bit on the front. The Kamkaze planes that did hit, spread themselves out across the deck.
You need a pointy bit on the front. No pointy bit = no entry.
its a good month for stundie
http://screwloosechange.xbehome.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=1493&view=findpost&p=21936
AFRL/DE Public Affairs said:Here's an answer to DEW supporters received from the DIRECTED ENERGY DIRECTORATE located at Kirtland AFB, NM, home of the Air Force Research Lab and neighbor of Los Alamos and of Sandia and other top secret military installations.
"MESSAGE: I received your fax yesterday and your FedEx package today, and had a chance to review the materials you sent. During our telephone conversation I outlined a variety of directed energies that might have future weapons applications but I'm not aware of any that are mature enough to cause the damage at the World Trade Center. Lasers are the most likely candidates for nearer-term weapons use and, to that enc, we have conducted laboratory tests to evaluate the effects of laser energy on different materials. For the most part, those materials have been metals, not concrete structures. Effects on metals are from the heat generated by an intense beam of coherent light, which cause the metals to weaken and split. Given sufficient heat, metals would melt (become liquids) and, given significantly more heat, could turn to gases. Since we haven't tested concrete I don't know if the effect would be dust. You report phenomena that we cannot explain here, either because we don't have enough data or because the phenomena are not within our area of expertise. While on a personal level I may find Dr Wood's investigation interesting and worthy of further consideration, on a professional level we are unable to devote our limited resources to activities outside of our charter, I wish you success in your endeavor and am available to answer whatever directed energy questions may arise.
Respectfully,
JUVEISTTINO R GARCÍA
Director of Public Affairs
Directed Energy Directorate
Air Force Research Laboratory
Kirtland AFB, NM 87117-6776"
If you were David Rockefeller, would you promote some donkey to be POTUS without having something on him that could finish him in a heartbeat. Homosexuality is a bit passe these days, paedophilia would be a lot better. You find some wannabe politicians, invite them to a weekend in Bohemian Grove. You keep the 'players' and sack the rest. Now you have puppets, all ready and eager to dance to your tune. Check out "Conspiracy of Silence" and "The Franklin Cover Up".
Boystown, no doubt started in good faith, would soon become a magnet for paedophiles etc. Next, you get your political puppets to mix civilian in with military and you have a ready made airfield 20 mins from Boystown.
You can now ship paedo's in and kids out, maybe down to DC for the weekend.
When you need an airfield for your flights to knock down the towers, what better place than the one you know well, Offutt.
Your towers have been twice condemned, asbestos etc. They will only let you handball the towers down at a cost of $15 billion. So you get a New York drug dealing, club owning property developer to take care of the NY side. You get Raytheon to put together a straitforward remote control lift off and delivery. You con Warren Buffet into hosting a golf tournament on the day, so that all take offs are in the dark of night. You have your stooges in the MSM ready with the blame game and off you go.
Who else did it? I didn't do it, you didn't do it, the hot dog seller didn't do it. Who else has got the kind of pull to do it and keep the MSM on side all this time? Rockefeller and Rothschilde did it and everybody knows.
i dont know, hes been yanking for over 6 months now, if hes just joking around hes very persistent (and apparently easily amused)Is Stundie for real? Does anyone think it more likely that he may actually be yanking our chains?
No one could be that stupid. No-one.
Nobody can get 175 from Logan to NYC via a hijack. Try it, how can you be sure you will get through security with boxcutter in one pocket and GPS in the other?
How can you be sure Chuck Norris won't be on board and in a bad mood?
That's before Rockefeller says OK to your plan. Whereas I via Raytheon have just taken an empty 757 up, flown it around and landed it with no trouble. How must more sure, is my easy remote controlled lift off, then simply due east to the homing beacons. No aggro, nice and bonny, then "Good Morning Manhattan"
I'll post evidence after 15 posts.
i think planes a bit sturdier than insects....faster too
Military planes are, civilian planes are not.
0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 0.
This month's stundie votes are going to be impossible.
-Gumboot
http://ae911truth.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17&start=45Andrew Chapman said:Re: path of least resistance. Sure the gravity is pushing us vertically down, but if this were the only factor we would presumably all be meeting somewhere around the centre of the earth. If I put a football on the top of a mountain it seems to me more likely that it would roll down the hill rather than bore a hole through the mountain. Likewise the upper section of the towers are much more likely to lean or topple than to crush the lower section, which is undamaged and not particularly hot - and extremely strong.