Two from the same firm who did nothing but watch a few videos equals "Structural engineers from around the world?"
The videos are all that is needed to see WTC 7 was a CD.
They are qualified to make the call, you are not.
Out of hundreds of thousands? I gave you a list of 145 structural and fire protection engineers who actually worked on the 9/11 investigation, and who disagree with you.
My statement that started this particular debate was:
"Fires cannot cause high rise buildings to implode the way WTC 7 did."
Did all 145 structural engineers on that list say that fires could cause a high rise building to collapse the way WTC 7 did?
Let's try this again. Here's your list. Point out the people who were fired for going against the official story.
For an English major, your reading comprehension really sucks.
"These people were threatened, fired, their pensions taken away, legally gagged or
terrorized by a SWAT team.
Lt. Col. Anthony Schaffer
Navy Capt. Scott Phillpott
James D. Smith
Major Eric Kleinsmith
Col. Steve Butler
Sibel Edmonds
Robert Wright
Indira Singh
Major Mike McCormack
Since there isn't a shred of evidence to back his opinion, it was correct to reprimand him.
The evidence went the way of Bush's National Guard records and Cheney's emails.
Not in the military, chief. Not in private enterprise, chief.
Every soldier takes an oath to protect the constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Each is honor bound to blow the whistle when a crime has been committed.
Those in private enterprise have the right to free speech.
Some employers don't believe in the first amendment, they are not good or patriotic citizens.
Your evidence that any guns were pointed at his head and that his house was ransacked?
His word. SWAT teams do that sort of thing.
Ever hear of terrorism? Ever hear of meth labs?
How the hell did they know that?
He let the 6 detectives search his house without a search warrant.
He was cooperating.
He was not a threat.
He was outnumbered six to one.
There was no need to call in the SWAT team.
Man, are they doing a TERRIBLE job of keeping the negativity out of the press! Heads at NWO HQ oughta roll for this!
It ain't in the press, it's on google video. MSM doesn't cover people like Mike McCormack
McCormack's got some good points about air quality at Ground Zero. Those are not secrets.
That's an understatement.
Otherwise he's a kook, speaking at an event hosted by Les Jamieson and attended by other kooks.
You have such great respect for the heroes of 9/11 until they say something you don't want to hear, then they're 'kooks'.
Can you spell 'hypocrite' ?
Mike is a 9/11 hero who is fighting for the first responders who are dying because Bush told Whitman to lie about the dangers at ground zero.
The government is not helping them.
This is a national disgrace.
Oh, so the EMT who said she thought WTC 7 was going to come down or be brought down, was also a risk management IT specialist who claims that there's a "CIA within the CIA," and that Ptech was a CIA front company. Er, too bad she has no evidence of that.
She has money trails and a web people connections.
The article says she was threatened "in no uncertain terms." Well, that's a criminal offense. So what did she do about it?
What could she do, it's a he said she said.
Her story leaves out the fact that Ptech was investigated by the FBI. No one from that company was charged with any crime because no evidence of wrongdoing was found.
Read the whole article, there's some intrigue in the FBI's handling of the whole thing.
No
C7 said:
The statements in the NIST and FEMA reports [that you insisted i read] clearly show that
the 10 story gouge described on pg 18 did not exist
Do you have statements or other evidence to the contrary?
Gravy said:
You have NOT said what those statements are or what that evidence is.
But haven't you noticed my constant admonishments that these issues are being investigated by NIST, that they haven't released their final report yet, and that you're basing your claims on preliminary information?
You haven't noticed my constant reminders that "There is no evidence" is in the present tense. [i.e. the real world] and there's no reason to believe that there will be evidence to prove the fighters who said "no heavy debris in the lobby areas" were mistaken or that a 10 story gouge, 60 to 80 feet wide and 30 to 40 feet deep, escaped Chief Fellini's notice, or that this gouge somehow left the atrium glass intact.
These things are not going to change in the final report.
You have not provided evidence to the contrary and you cannot deny you stated the $13,700 pic & vid special as a fact.
ETA: you didn't mention the 'only for home use" part.
