• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

StopSylviaBrowne: "I have never nor ever will charge..."

Robert,

I just read the three new articles. I have got to stop doing that on an empty stomach.


Your reasoned, rational recitation of facts and statements make each article all the more damning of SB of the horror she continues to perpetuate on grieving, vulnerable people.




Once again :th:



I am honored to know you.


Boo
 
Robert,
I too am honored to know you. I've pointed people to your site countless times so that your calm analysis can speak for me.
Thanks again for all of your efforts.

Ed Baehr
 
RSLancastr said:
Sylvia Browne: "I have never nor ever will charge..."

Browne says that she never charges for missing person and homicide cases. Is this true?
Click to expand...

I thought that the case (a woman with a missing adult son) that Anderson Cooper showed when he followed up the success stories provided by Sylvia was an example of her charging in a missing persons case. And it also didn't involve law enforcement.

Linda
 
I'm quite sure that at least 2 of our families told me that after the show, when they asked SB for more info, she said she would provide it for a fee. :mad:
 
RSL's SSB piece said:
However, the psychic with a master's degree in English literature would not give the name of Horgan's killer because she said she is concerned about the ethics of doing so.
Click to expand...
She is concerned with the ethics of revealing the name of a murderer to law enforcement authorities? Seems to me that it is unethical to withhold that information if she is aware of it.

Could it be that she really doesn't know in the first place? Certainly she can't doubt herself! After all, her psychic abilities are "like breathing". :rolleyes:
 
SB is/was concerned about ethics :jaw-dropp

That woman's picture appears in the dictionary under Hypocirte, and she is worried that giving the name of a person she "sees" as the murder to the police would be unethical?

Is it unethical to have your common-law daughter-in-law set up a fan website to try to rally the stupid in order to get them to forget about the Anderson Cooper debacle, and then claim it is an independent site created by a person who is not "one of us"?

Is it unethical to lie to your followers and fans, claiming that you rent a house from your son when you own more property than most people do in a lifetime, with values in the millions?

Is it unethical to sell fake jewelry as real, have your common-law daughter-in-law sell it at your lectures, and then try to hide the fact that it is fake until RSL posts an article about it on SSB?

Is it unethical to fund your "Spiritual Organization" by scheming and lying to investors to invest in a mine, and instead put the money in your "Spiritual Organizations" bank account?

Is it unethical to tell Shawn Hornbecks parents, on National TV, that their son is dead, and then give false descriptions of the murder and his car to throw off the investigation?

Is it unethical to use your "church" as a front to sell your books, tapes, products, lectures, cruises, salons, t-shirts and readings?

Is it unethical to call all of those who are revealing the Truth about you Evil and Dark, even though you say one can't judge the soul of another?

Is it unethical to record all of the phone calls between yourself, your staff, and those that you are calling without their knowledge?

Is it unethical to threaten those who speak out against you with investigation by the FBI and District Attorney?

Is it unethical to try to steal a building from someone that worked untiringly for years to promote your church?

Is it unethical to have your mafia Board attack anyone that questions you or your actions, or the actions of your church?

Is it unethical to use church staff to run your companies?

Opal Jenings, was that ethical?

Sylvia Browne, her Staff, and her Board of Directors know nothing at all about ethics. They base all they do on deceit and lies, and wouldn't be able to pass the most basic ethics test.

SB, and her entire "inner circle" are frauds.
 
Last edited:
Woo-hoo!

I'm confused about what really happened to Shawn Hornbeck. He told his parents he was going to a friend's house, he didn't go there, he was seen with some other kids and then he was adbucted?

This "Keith" lead she gave themwas just plain stupid- all the children seen with him had already been questioned. The police, community and search foundation had long seen to that.
 
Oh yeah- she got Opal Jo Jennings and Shawn Hornbeck confused. He was a sex slave, she was dead and dumped in the woods!

Switch the scenarios around and they're perfect!
 
Boo said:
Once again :th:

I am honored to know you.
Click to expand...
Thanks, Boo! Good to see you around these here parts again!

Ed Baehr said:
Thanks again for all of your efforts.
Click to expand...
Thanks, Ed.

wahrheit said:
I like the Epilogue very much. :thumbsup:
Click to expand...
:)

fls said:
I thought that the case (a woman with a missing adult son) that Anderson Cooper showed when he followed up the success stories provided by Sylvia was an example of her charging in a missing persons case. And it also didn't involve law enforcement.
Click to expand...
Yes, I considered mentioning that in the article as well, but we really don't know for certain whether Browne charged that woman, nor whether law enforcement was involved.

Kelly said:
I'm quite sure that at least 2 of our families told me that after the show, when they asked SB for more info, she said she would provide it for a fee. :mad:
Click to expand...
Kelly, if you recall who they were, please email me about it. If you think it appropriate, I would like to contact them and talk with them about this.

Mr. Skinny said:
She is concerned with the ethics of revealing the name of a murderer to law enforcement authorities? Seems to me that it is unethical to withhold that information if she is aware of it.
Click to expand...
If you read the article again, you'll see that the reporter wasn't clear about who Browne was refusing to name the murderer to. It is altogether possible that she named him to the police, but was refusing to name him to the reporter.

One odd thing about the story which I didn't mention in the article: She seemed to have given two very different versions of how the priest was killed: 1) He was killed my a jealous gay mulatto in a fit of passion, and 2) He was killed in a hit ordered by a gang leader of some sort. :confused:

PastBrowneFan said:
SB is/was concerned about ethics :jaw-dropp
Click to expand...
Yup. :rolleyes:
 
RSLancastr said:
Kelly, if you recall who they were, please email me about it. If you think it appropriate, I would like to contact them and talk with them about this.
Click to expand...

I will send an email to the persons I think may have been quoted fees. If I get a response, I will let you know, no problem.
 
RSLancastr said:
One odd thing about the story which I didn't mention in the article: She seemed to have given two very different versions of how the priest was killed: 1) He was killed my a jealous gay mulatto in a fit of passion, and 2) He was killed in a hit ordered by a gang leader of some sort. :confused:
Click to expand...
:rolleyes:

But she can't be right all of the time... I guess that copout doesn't always work. Then again, I'm not sure it ever did given that she isn't right any more than chance.
 
PastBrowneFan said:
Is it unethical to record all of the phone calls between yourself, your staff, and those that you are calling without their knowledge?
Click to expand...

Absolutely unethical, and also illegal in the State of California. If you have evidence for such a crime being committed mayhaps one should contact a law enforcement agency? It might be a good way to finally rid us of Ms. Browne.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom