Once upon a time there was an evil group of men who enslaved others, actively participated in terrorism, theft, arson and murder. They conspired to change the laws of a neighboring area to fit more to their liking. There was a war that resulted in one major population area being practically burned to the ground.
What am I talking about? The Missouri/Kansas border war, the James Gang and Quantrell's Raiders. My bloodlines can be traced to all that. In the 1850's, Quantrell's Raiders and members of the group that would become the James Gang raided Lawrence, Kansas and burned it to the ground. They were trying to get Kansas admitted as a slave state so their slaves would not have a free state to flee to right at their doorstep. They robbed the banks all around here, including right down the road in Liberty, Missouri. My ancestors were part of this group. So, israelside, am I still to be held accountable for what they did? Does this mean I have access to plans for bank robberies, evil cabals that want to restore slavery, or other evils? You are perfectly willing to brand the Rockefellers on less than this, only because they are guilty of having money. You have made vile accusations of their integrity, honor, and morality based on rumor, innuendo, gossip, and jealousy. They have been deemed guilty on the basis of unfounded paranoia, only because they happen to possibly have relatives generations removed that maybe did bad things. My relatives did much worse, and it's not rumor, it's fact. So maybe I should be rounded up, by your logic.
Think a bit more about what you're saying about these people, and look at what evidence you're using to tar them with. Look at the sources you're getting the information from. Then think about who's being naive, here.
however Dave you are getting at another crucial point, that is, if you can show there is no way to ever prove something like thermate was used in the WTC then you prove it wasn't in there? So if we can't prove it was in there by chemical analysis and we can't prove it wasn't in there because of chemical analysis thennnn that must mean we should trust the government and believe their statements about the events of 911. That's why these things are theories...no one can really prove it (yet atleast) we just hope it's true based off prior knowledge of govts and their actions. Speaking about these things (that can't be proved) really is a waste of time you see why? Why not talk about the known cases of CIA drug smuggling or illegal weapons trades by govt agents and try to convict them? Because we all want to push the envelope and create something more, I am guilty at times but is anyone else in here guilty of that aswell? Sure, we all have bias towards something because of our experience with it and our assumptions on cases based off of those experiences we have had. 911 is very deep and unless we get more evidence (namely a chemical in thermate that is distict from all other chemicals in the WTC) or anything else about 911 we just have to theorize...but that doesn't make the theorist nutty or a wacko...it most likely means they as hoping for something to be true that they have seen before, if you havn't you call them nuts and walk away...
