Oliver
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2006
- Messages
- 17,396
Wait, are you saying OBL was right to do what he did?
No, what I'm saying is: "If I shot your daughter, I shouldn't whine if you shoot my daughter in return". [/metaphor]
Wait, are you saying OBL was right to do what he did?
Does that justify the holding of diplomats as hostages? I think not, but it is so typically American to view all aggression as ‘out of the blue’ and unprovoked.
No, what I'm saying is: "If I shot your daughter, I shouldn't whine if you shoot my daughter in return". [/metaphor]
I know that there is no hope for solving any problem if you don’t first understand the problem and we should look at our foreign policy in the Mid-East to date objectively and with a skeptical eye.
Knee jerk whining that some one is ‘bad mouthing’ America every time someone is critical of policy is worse that childish, it’s dangerous and it’s getting very old indeed.
And what did America do to deserve 9/11?
What did the 3000 innocent men and women do to the Middle East?
What did the estimated 1,000,000 innocent arabs do to the US who died during wars and embargos before 9/11?
And how does this compare to any other major power in the world? Your list is completely meaningless given its complete lack of context. were there reasons for the interventions, or was it just because the US is evil?You might find this interesting:
Ever since the United States Army massacred 300 Lakotas in 1890, American forces have intervened elsewhere around the globe 100 times. Indeed the United States has sent troops abroad or militarily struck other countries' territory 216 times since independence from Britain. Since 1945 the United States has intervened in more than 20 countries throughout the world.
http://www.ilaam.net/Sept11/AmericanWars.html
So we should blame society every time a killer murders someone?
Magwa understand quite well, Oliver.You still refuse to understand.
Directly and indirectly matters a great deal, Oliver.US foreign policy lead to 9/11 - no matter if directly or indirectly.
Arabs and mostly SaudisAnd while were at the 19 Hijackers and OBL:
Why are you asking me? I am not Paul Wolfowitz. I would get a kick out of planning and coordinating a half dozen B-2's, filled with 2000 and 5000 pound PGM's, in a planned strike on the black stone of Meccah in the middle of the Hajj. It would tickle me pink. That would send a message: you screw with us in the name of Allah, Osama, and Sadr Man, I take your freaking Allah Stone and turn it into gravel.Why IRAQ and not Pakistan and Saudi-Arabia or just OBL himself - you know, the guys who actually WHERE involved in 9/11?
No, that isn't what Ron Paul meant, it is what you mean, and you wish to use this as a springboard into Standard, Oliver Style America Bashing. I've heard this song before.The whole Iraq war leads to more terrorism - that was exactly what Ron Paul meant and this is what this thread is about, isn't it?
What estimate?
So the US is responsible for this "million people"? Every war ever fought before 9/11 is America's fault?
So we should blame society every time a killer murders someone?
All the sole fault of the US Oliver? And far more Arabs have been killed by other Arabs than the US has ever done.What did the estimated 1,000,000 innocent arabs do to the US who died during wars and embargos before 9/11?
That's a ratio I hope stays heavily in our favor.The US caused many times more deaths than all violent american deaths together.
No of course not.
However, if I were to rob a mafia figure and rape his wife and he later tracked me down and killed me, you would be pretty naïve to conclude that I had no hand in my own demise.
You might find this interesting:
Ever since the United States Army massacred 300 Lakotas in 1890, American forces have intervened elsewhere around the globe 100 times. Indeed the United States has sent troops abroad or militarily struck other countries' territory 216 times since independence from Britain. Since 1945 the United States has intervened in more than 20 countries throughout the world.
http://www.ilaam.net/Sept11/AmericanWars.html

The simple answer is that Saddam was solely responsible for his actions, which brought about the embargo. And he had plenty of money to buy food and medicine - he chose to build palaces and statues and secret police forces instead. He kept his population medicine-free and deprived because he wanted to appear to be the victim, and the useful idiots all over the world (including you apparently) swallowed it hook, line, and sinker.Seriously: Let's say the Arabs would place an embargo on Canada and let's say that 10000 Canadians die because they couldn't get their required, foreign Medicine. Who do you think is the responsible for these deaths in this simple case?
I know you love to duck but this should be a simple question.
Seriously: Let's say the Arabs would place an embargo on Canada and let's say that 10000 Canadians die because they couldn't get their required, foreign Medicine. Who do you think is the responsible for these deaths in this simple case?
It's true - if we had let the Nazis finish what they started there would have been no Jews left to found the state of Israel.Shocking. Osama attacked us because we fought in WWII.![]()
Magwa understand quite well, Oliver.
DIrectly and indirectly matters a great deal, Oliver.
Arabs and mostly Saudis
Why are you asking me? I am not Paul Wolfowitz.
No, that isn't what Ron Paul meant, it is what you mean, and you wish to use this as a springboard into Standard Oliver American Bashing Derail.
You are as transparent as plastic wrap, and as substantial.
DR
Spell it out Oliver - what exactly did we "do over there"?"They attacked us because WE ARE OVER THERE".
"What would WE think if China would do this to us?"
He is right.