Canada Seal Slaughter begins

No. You said "as high esteem as O'Reilly". People on this forum generally don't old O'Reilly at high esteem. Which makes it sarcasm.

Even if it's a fact, It's still an insult. By definition..

Insult-to treat or speak to insolently or with contemptuous rudeness; affront.
Insolent-boldly rude or disrespectful; contemptuously impertinent; insulting: an insolent reply.
Rude-discourteous or impolite, esp. in a deliberate way: a rude reply.
http://dictionary.reference.com

If I called you an "ugly Jew" it would be an insult. You might be ugly and you might be Jewish. However it's an insult regardless of it's factual accuracy. Get it?

This is more sarcasm. You chastise me for being "loud and aggressive"(though I don't see how I can even be loud in an internet forum) yet you continue to insult me? Do you think you'll get your point across insulting people?

What if I found other people who were ugly and posted pictures of them claiming that because they were ugly it was not an insult to you because you were not the only ugly person? Don't answer that.

I find that getting aggressive and loud with people tells them that you're serious and makes them take you seriously.

Being aggressive in your arguement can also have the complete opposite affect and turn people off to what you are saying.
 
maddox.jpg
 
What if I found other people who were ugly and posted pictures of them claiming that because they were ugly it was not an insult to you because you were not the only ugly person? Don't answer that.

You're not making any sense here. Insults are insults regardless of factuality.


Being aggressive in your arguement can also have the complete opposite affect and turn people off to what you are saying.

When someone is doing something incredibly stupid you need to be aggressive and loud to talk sense into them.
 
Dustin, enough with your passive agressive BS and attitude.

Maybe YOU are the kook?

Maybe?



LOL
 
Dustin, enough with your passive agressive BS and attitude.

Maybe YOU are the kook?

Maybe?



LOL

This post was the epitome of maturity.

Oh, oops, sorry, that was Dawkin's latest book. My mistake.
 
[qimg]http://members.cox.net/%7Ebalrog666/maddox.jpg[/qimg]

Intriguing. You post this image without giving credit to the creator, Maddox. I have now fixed that for you. The full article is here.

Though, to be fair, at least you've actually posted something that was amusing. I like Maddox, but find him hard to take seriously... on anything.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom