freudianlip
Thinker
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2007
- Messages
- 238
Last edited:
and........ what??....![]()
This has been a very informative thread!
I've never even been exposed to weed or hash, never been offered it, never been around someone smoking it.
But from what I've been told, you'll do more damage to yourself drinking one caffeinated, carbonated beverage a day (like my wife's Mt. Dew fix) than you will smoking one joint a day.
Given the bloating and illness I feel drinking coke, I believe them.
I've been told that pot is less damaging that tobacco and less addictive than alcohol, yet tobacco and alcohol are legal! How strange.
From what I have heard, in the U.S. almost all hash and weed is smoked straight or mixed into food. Blending it with tobacco is strictly considered taboo in many areas - I guess it's a very low-class way of trying to stretch your stash, or something!
I wonder how the health issues compare to my own habit - smoking a pipe of tobacco 2-3 times a week. I mean, what I smoke is unfiltered, but it's also not the heavily processed stuff that gets rolled into cigs, either.
At any rate, I'm all for legalization of pot.
Maybe it was Ben Goldacre's Bad Science column? Online version here - http://www.badscience.net/?p=389Wish I could remember where, um, but there was a refutation to the Guardian article: It showed graphs for potency over the years--there were fluctuations, but nothing like an order-of-magnitude increase in potency.
And nobody answered about why everyone seems to assume that it would have to be forbidden to grow your bl**dy own stuff. i don´t understand why!
(Only to protect the sales of some companies?)
Maybe because you answered the question yourself?
O.K., you partly answered it. If everyone grew it, that would be quite a loss of tax money.
Is it dangerous to drive after smoking (weed)?
(References please. In my experience drinking does affect driving a lot, while only a very high dose of weed would impair driving. Low doses usually make you more cautious)
In the UK at least, the offence is not drink-driving, it is driving (or cycling in fact) while under the influence of any drug. Obviously alcohol is the most common and gets the most focus, but it is just as illegal to drive after smoking weed as it is to drive after a few pints. The trouble is, while tests for alcohol are fairly simple, testing for other drugs can be very tricky, especially considering how many different drugs are out there. There is also the problem that, as far as I know, only alcohol has an actual definition of what it means to be "intoxicated" (although of course the limit is different in different countries). Prosecuting someone for drink-driving is easy because either they are over the limit or not. For drugs where there is no official limit it can be much harder to prove that you were actually a danger.
It actually scares me how few people know this. In order to get a driving license you have to pass a theory test, and in order to do that you are supposed to know everything in the highway code, where all this is clearly stated. Yet virtually no-one I have ever talked to actually realises that driving after taking any drug is a crime.
I realise this doesn't answer the question of whether it is actually dangerous to drive after smoking weed. Dangerous or not though, in the UK it is definately illegal.
Really!? Have you a source for this claim?
Two questions,
Why would it have to be forbidden to grow your own (weed)?
(Only to protect the sales of some companies?)
and
Is it dangerous to drive after smoking (weed)?
(References please. In my experience drinking does affect driving a lot, while only a very high dose of weed would impair driving. Low doses usually make you more cautious)
Maybe it was Ben Goldacre's Bad Science column? Online version here - http://www.badscience.net/?p=389
from your source:
http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic265.htm
...
Attention is the issue. Instead of having 7 boxcars in your mental chain, you now have 4 or 5. You can attend to fewer things, and shift between them with less skill.
Sudden trainwreck possible.
Sorry no source. Not a good idea to drive while stoned.
Really!? Have you a source for this claim?
This seems quite informative.
You mentioned hash psychosis. As an attack on the idea of using marijuana, I suppose.
I linked an article that demonstrated that it was likely that studies involving hash being compared with psychosis could very well be bunk.
You linked a study that demonstrated something. What did it demonstrate? How did you translate the abstract, or the study? Do you even comprehend it? If so, put some of it into your own words if you can.
Fancy a J????Is it dangerous to drive after smoking (weed)?
Cannabis use has been associated with increased risk of becoming involved in traffic accidents; however, the relation between THC concentration and driver impairment is relatively obscure. The present study was designed to define performance impairment as a function of THC in serum and oral fluid in order to provide a scientific framework to the development of per se limits for driving under the influence of cannabis. Twenty recreational users of cannabis participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way cross-over study. Subjects were administered single doses of 0, 250 and 500 microg/kg THC by smoking. Performance tests measuring skills related to driving were conducted at regular intervals between 15 min and 6h post smoking and included measures of perceptual-motor control (Critical tracking task), motor impulsivity (Stop signal task) and cognitive function (Tower of London). Blood and oral fluid were collected throughout testing. Results showed a strong and linear relation between THC in serum and oral fluid. Linear relations between magnitude of performance impairment and THC in oral fluid and serum, however, were low. A more promising way to define threshold levels of impairment was found by comparing the proportion of observations showing impairment or no impairment as a function of THC concentration. The proportion of observations showing impairment progressively increased as a function of serum THC in every task. Binomial tests showed an initial and significant shift toward impairment in the Critical tracking task for serum THC concentrations between 2 and 5 ng/ml. At concentrations between 5 and 10 ng/ml approximately 75-90% of the observations were indicative of significant impairment in every performance test. At THC concentrations >30 ng/ml the proportion of observations indicative of significant impairment increased to a full 100% in every performance tests. It is concluded that serum THC concentrations between 2 and 5 ng/ml establish the lower and upper range of a THC limit for impairment.
Refer to Hypothesis;
[
Note; endogenous! naturally occurring not introduced extraneously as part of the study!
These researchers just investigated the role of endocannabinoid signaling in psychotic states by measuring levels of the endocannabinoid anandamide in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of acute paranoid-type schizophrenic patients.