I don't recall doing this.
No, you didn't. I got carried up in a rant that had nothing to do with you. I don't even know why now; I suppose if I went back and read it through, I would realize why.
I found your post polite enough and inquisitive enough.
In fact, I thought I explained my questions at the end if my first post.
I do not pretend understand the culture and mindset in the US regarding this, hence my asking about it.
I understand, I was expressing my anger. I wasn't meaning you when I made the rant.
My apologies for being so vague.
Anyways, I just want to reiterate a point (with insane rantings aside!):
I don't necessary want people to have the right to concealed carry and the right to firearms (for sport, target shooting, and for self defense) because I think that a violent situation is "just around the corner", and just wanting people to have the right to a concealed carry does not, within itself, assume a life of paranoia.
However, allow me to throw up a logical standpoint, and you can probably come to see why I reach my conclusion. You may get a viewpoint into the American mindset, but you have to keep in mind that I've only been in America for a minority of my life. Most of it was spent in Korea (which had heavy heavy projectile laws; can't even get a bow), or in Germany (which I barely remember, since I was so young).
Point one (Majority Overcoming Minority, Minority Suffers): A law tends to affect everyone, irrespective of where they live. However, some individuals live in more dangerous areas, or are in more dangerous situations, more often than others. Sure, I personally may be safe; but that doesn't mean that that woman that lives in the Projects next to a gang will be safe. And if the police refuse to go into her neighborhood, or if the police themselves are actually corrupt? Then what about retired police officers, who may have made a few enemies? I could probably name other individuals with their own life stories. Either way, I cannot speak for all people; and if I cannot speak for all people, then I do not think that I should be making decisions that puts any of these people's lives in harm's way. Relying on the police isn't always going to work; first, you have to dial; then, you have to wait for the police units to get on the scene. In the space of that time, many things can happen. Personally, I don't believe that you should force everyone to
have to take that chance.
Point two (No Practicality): Even if you accept that heavy gun control is a "good thing", it has no practical value in the United States. We're a gun-saturated culture, and even if we work to destroy every illegal firearm we come across, there's going to be millions upon millions of legal firearms; and no one really wants to give them up. Gun collections tend to be
big. I have a friend in Illinois, and his gun collection involves a civilian-issue FN FAL, many many pistols, etc. I can ask him for details later if anyone's really curious. Ironically, I'd trust him with a firearm faster than I'd trust the nextdoor neighbor with a spatula (depending on which one you're talking about...)
Point Three (Hunting/Sports Culture): Guns have their own culture here, often referred to as our "gun culture". And yes, it is a culture. From the frontier ideal (which is rather archaic now) to the hunting scene to the sports scene. But the Hunting/Sports Culture has little to do with concealed carry, it's just a point I bring up.
In another Gun Control thread, I talked with someone that stated that if you live in an urban environment and not a "frontier lifestyle", you
need extremely strong government intervention, heavy laws and restrictions, yadda yadda. While he had a point up to a point, as a pseudo-American (again, knowing my background, though I've mainly hung around Americans more than anything else), the idea of incredibly strong government telling you what to do every step of the way, even to the point of stating that you cannot defend yourself... that sends a repulsive shiver down my spine. I don't want to be a puppet of a government.
Then there's the fact that I'm still all for safety courses being a required part of owning a firearm. Buying a firearm requires a certain amount of responsibility, and one of those responsibilities is to know how to use it if you ever do. I think that there should be basic courses required: The first one being safety, the second one being to know how to shoot it (and encouragement on the shooter's part to go to shooting ranges to build up their accuracy), and the third one being some self-defense basics; how to retain their firearm if someone intends to take it away, etc.
Anyways, there are other points I can make, but none are really coming to mind, and I feel like getting in some more gaming before I get to work on school. I hope this gives you some insight, however.