PS Audio Noise Harvester

Paulhoff said:
Once again that show how little you know about computers and digital audio, you know nothing about timing circuits, buffers, etc. The signal coming in does not, not and again, does not go directly to the DA converter, daaaa. There is interlacing, digital correction, etc. Daaaaaaa.

Paul

:) :) :)
Click to expand...
You don't have proper knowledge on buffers, they don't work perfectly like in the skeptics' dream world. The less jitter is input into the buffer the better it performs and the less jitter comes out. That's why transports matter for external DACs.

Once you know this you also know that all the external interferences like vibration, power and EMI matter. Especially for timing circuits.
 
Paulhoff said:
So I guess skeptics don't drive cars, don't ride in planes, and we can't see the TV too.

Paul

:) :) :)

Daaaaaaa
Click to expand...
You don't need good eyes to see the difference in resolution of a TV. Even seeing the difference between 99Hz and 100Hz is easy. Audio is far more advanced than that.

Paulhoff said:
I have been doing audio for over 40 years now, same old woo-woo different package.......
Click to expand...
Like I said early in this thread, once you have done something for a few years the delusion has taken over and it's hard to bring them back to reality.
 
ExtremeSkeptic said:
The less jitter is input into the buffer the better it performs and the less jitter comes out.
Click to expand...
BS, once again you have shown that you have not knowledge about how buffers and timing circuits work. Timing circuits are completely independent of input. If jitter had that much affect than you wouldn't be able to download programs that would work in you computer and your CD computer games would crash all the time.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Paulhoff said:
What, do you think that you have something new that I haven't heard before, noooooooo. Also do you think you are the only one on the planet that can think fast, noooooo.

Paul

:) :) :)
Click to expand...
You obviously haven't tried ERS Paper, otherwise you would have wrapped your whole system in it. Just because you heard woo-woo 40 years ago doesn't mean it still exists.
 
ExtremeSkeptic said:
Like I said early in this thread, once you have done something for a few years the delusion has taken over and it's hard to bring them back to reality.
Click to expand...
I like to see your face when a young kid looks at you and says the same thing, Daaaaaa.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Paulhoff said:
BS, once again you have shown that you have not knowledge about how buffers and timing circuits work. Timing circuits are completely independent of input. If jitter had that much affect than you wouldn't be able to download programs that would work in you computer and your CD computer games would crash all the time.

Paul

:) :) :)
Click to expand...
You are comparing digital computer to analog audio. With the computer it either works perfectly or it doesn't work at all. With audio it can still work even if it isn't perfect. Like you said, if you add jitter to the computer it either works or it crashes. But if you add jitter to analog audio it will still output audio, but it doesn't mean it works perfectly just because the computer does.
 
ExtremeSkeptic said:
You obviously haven't tried ERS Paper, otherwise you would have wrapped your whole system in it. Just because you heard woo-woo 40 years ago doesn't mean it still exists.
Click to expand...
You know nothing about shielding, do you have a AM radio in your car, drive under a bridge listening to a radio station and tell me what happens to the signal.

Paul

:) :) :)

The woo-woo is worse then ever, but it has always been there, you are not the first or will you be the last to think you know something new.
 
Paulhoff said:
I like to see your face when a young kid looks at you and says the same thing, Daaaaaa.

Paul

:) :) :)
Click to expand...
I have been a skeptic of audio longer than I have been a believer. I actually tried it for myself instead of believing everyone had placebo. Why do you think I know so much about skeptics? Because I have been one myself. I thought others were delusional for thinking an amplifier changed the sound, but it was me who was delusional because I thought of things too simple. I used the "on or off" thinking like the skeptics do in this forum.
 
Paulhoff said:
You know nothing about shielding, do you have a AM radio in your car, drive under a bridge listening to a radio station and tell me what happens to the signal.

Paul

:) :) :)

The woo-woo is worse then ever, but it has always been there, you are not the first or will you be the last to think you know something new.
Click to expand...
If a skeptic lives on another planet and wants to ground the shield of his system he travels with his spaceship to Earth and plugs it in with a long cable.
 
ExtremeSkeptic said:
You are comparing digital computer to analog audio. With the computer it either works perfectly or it doesn't work at all. With audio it can still work even if it isn't perfect. Like you said, if you add jitter to the computer it either works or it crashes. But if you add jitter to analog audio it will still output audio, but it doesn't mean it works perfectly just because the computer does.
Click to expand...
The timing circuit has nothing to do with the input signal, if your timing circuit sucks then anything you do before it means nothing.

Paul

:) :) :)

And don't forgot the shaping circuit.
 
ExtremeSkeptic said:
I used the "on or off" thinking like the skeptics do in this forum.
Click to expand...
No, you only give woo-woo. You give no facts, you will not read and learn the truth, you think common sense is the way to go, they burn people as witches using that.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
ExtremeSkeptic said:
If a skeptic lives on another planet and wants to ground the shield of his system he travels with his spaceship to Earth and plugs it in with a long cable.
Click to expand...
I think that you haven't looked at you avatar......

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Paulhoff said:
You say you don't listen to music, so how would you know. And still it doesn't take away from the fact that you have shown that you know nothing about audio equipment, and everytime I think I know how little you do know you go and write more and show me that it even less than that.

Paul

:) :) :)
Click to expand...
I use the music to listen to my audio system while the skeptics use the audio system to listen to their music. Since they are hearing the music coming out from the speakers they think it is working properly.
 
Paulhoff said:
The timing circuit has nothing to do with the input signal, if your timing circuit sucks then anything you do before it means nothing.

Paul

:) :) :)

And don't forgot the shaping circuit.
Click to expand...
That's why I feed the timing circuit with Valhalla power so it works better.
 
ExtremeSkeptic said:
I have been a skeptic of audio longer than I have been a believer. I actually tried it for myself instead of believing everyone had placebo. Why do you think I know so much about skeptics?
Click to expand...
You know nothing of skeptics, you have proven that too. Also one that uses only themselves as judge will make many poor judgments. You think that you can woo-woo us, and because we don't fall over you say we are not the skeptics, you are extreme, but the word skeptic is not you.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Paulhoff said:
I think that you haven't looked at you avatar......

Paul

:) :) :)
Click to expand...
I bet you have looked at yours because you think you are smarter than Einstein because you have read his books. You even mixed your own quotes with his quotes like I did when I was young and ignorant. The problem is you think it matters, you think someone will look at the quotes and get impressed. But nobody will get impressed because all they think about is themselves. They don't care about others. The only reason someone cares about another person is so that they can feel better about themselves later on.

If I was evil I would post proof about the tweaks and laugh at you for your ignorance, but instead I will let you figure out the truth on your own. In 20 years it will be a fact that all the tweaks I have done make a difference. In 10 years people will already have their systems wrapped in hundreds of sheets of ERS Paper. It has already started. The same thing will be proven about cables too, I gave away a speaker cable for free and it turned a heavy skeptic into a believer. http://www.head-fi.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2829302&postcount=27


We have very different musical tastes and he is a firm disbeliever in many of the claims made by hi-fi companies. When I called him and told him I had just wired up my K240S' with a $500 piece of cable, he pretty much blew me off...
Click to expand...

HE WAS AMAZED. Immediately after placing my recabled 240s on his head he said they sounded way different. We spent the next 3 hours swapping between the setups, discussing what we heard.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom