PS Audio Noise Harvester

What sound do a train make........

Woo-Wooooooooo

That is so ridiculous, my 440 MHz radio would never work if that woo-woo happened to audio equipment, let alone my friend's 1.2 Ghz radio.

Paul

:) :) :)

Man, I wish I had known that about ERS paper when I was trying to track down inter-component EMI insided a spaceborne radio. :)
 
You are new to this? Maybe a virgin.......;)

I have hear this stuff as I say from my audio friend, I just wish he would read the real stuff and stop reading the woo-woo that is on the internet.

Paul

:) :) :)
You don't understand these things, and that's the truth which you cannot admit to yourself. Your audio friend is smarter than you will ever become and you can't handle it, so you have made yourself believe everyone else is having the placebo except yourself. It's pretty obvious that you are the one having the placebo because you have never thought of that possibility.

What sound do a train make........

Woo-Wooooooooo

That is so ridiculous, my 440 MHz radio would never work if that woo-woo happened to audio equipment, let alone my friend's 1.2 Ghz radio.

Paul

:) :) :)
For skeptics it is either on or off, nothing in between. They think there are images of 1's and 0's floating inside the cable that give instructions on the other end. They think everything is 100% perfect and magically immune to external interferences. They think that just because distorted audio comes out of the speakers it functions perfectly.
 
You don't understand these things, and that's the truth which you cannot admit to yourself. Your audio friend is smarter than you will ever become and you can't handle it, so you have made yourself believe everyone else is having the placebo except yourself. It's pretty obvious that you are the one having the placebo because you have never thought of that possibility.


For skeptics it is either on or off, nothing in between. They think there are images of 1's and 0's floating inside the cable that give instructions on the other end. They think everything is 100% perfect and magically immune to external interferences. They think that just because distorted audio comes out of the speakers it functions perfectly.

That is just a ridiculous statement. I would guess there are a couple of people on this forum that could give you chapter and verse on any type of interference. Do you know that interference is actually useful in certain cases, and is used intentionally? You do know that 1s and 0s are also susceptible to interference, right? I'm sure you don't want to start commenting on that discussion. Stick to what you know. Making statements regarding the ignorance of everyone else reveals more about your intelligence than anyone else's.
 
The problem with headphones is that they don't produce volume. I've listened for many hours to headphones and I have never had the feeling that I am sitting in a room with a musical instrument the way that good speakers can. Your whole body senses vibrations, particularly bass.

Headphones have their place but I don't consider them acceptable for quality listening. My car sounds better than any headphones I've ever heard. Alpine Type X speakers are worth the price.

Hey, would a noise harvester work in my car? :p
People with grillz and gold chains sitting in a car with hydraulics and spinners like to boost up the volume so they can "feel it". It's too bad those people will never know what proper audio quality is all about. Headphones are better than speakers + million dollars worth of room treatments.
 
Man, I wish I had known that about ERS paper when I was trying to track down inter-component EMI insided a spaceborne radio.
I am into amateur radio, and the word amateur only means I don't make money doing it, not that I am an amateur in knowledge like someone else here. ;)

Paul

:) :) :)
 
That is just a ridiculous statement. I would guess there are a couple of people on this forum that could give you chapter and verse on any type of interference. Do you know that interference is actually useful in certain cases, and is used intentionally? You do know that 1s and 0s are also susceptible to interference, right? I'm sure you don't want to start commenting on that discussion. Stick to what you know. Making statements regarding the ignorance of everyone else reveals more about your intelligence than anyone else's.
That was my point, 1's and 0's are analog signals and are susceptible to interference, but skeptics think they are not. They say you can just use a coat hanger to transmit the signals.

If they had proper understanding about audio they would already be using the tweaks but instead they call it woo-woo because they don't know any better. Anyone open-minded enough to try it knows the truth. Every audiophile forum laughs at this place, why do you think they don't post here? Because they are busy enjoying their improvements and laughing at the skeptics' ignorance.
In audiophile forums trying to make the skeptics understand is like trying to explain color with a color blind person. Trying to make the skeptics understand at Randi forum is like trying to explain color with a completely blind person.
 
People with grillz and gold chains sitting in a car with hydraulics and spinners like to boost up the volume so they can "feel it". It's too bad those people will never know what proper audio quality is all about. Headphones are better than speakers + million dollars worth of room treatments.
So, who to heck do you think your talking about here, no I don't see you in my house....

And no speakers are not better, the stereo separation is not correct because the music was not setup for headsets.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
That was my point, 1's and 0's are analog signals and are susceptible to interference, but skeptics think they are not. They say you can just use a coat hanger to transmit the signals.

You can. Not sure why you would want to, but you can.

If they had proper understanding about audio they would already be using the tweaks but instead they call it woo-woo because they don't know any better. Anyone open-minded enough to try it knows the truth. Every audiophile forum laughs at this place, why do you think they don't post here? Because they are busy enjoying their improvements and laughing at the skeptics' ignorance.


In audiophile forums trying to make the skeptics understand is like trying to explain color with a color blind person. Trying to make the skeptics understand at Randi forum is like trying to explain color with a completely blind person.

No, you just have to show evidence. And by the way, I am color blind. I don't need color explained. You probably think color blind people see in black and white. They don't.

"Laugh while you can, monkey-boy. Me and my overthruster, we a-going home."
 
I am into amateur radio, and the word amateur only means I don't make money doing it, not that I am an amateur in knowledge like someone else here. ;)

Paul

:) :) :)
Imagine how bad you will feel when you are suddenly faced with the truth and you realize all those years have been a waste. The solid ground on which you stand on will slide away and you will fall to the ground and hurt yourself.
Why do you think I haven't posted the proof yet? I'm giving you a chance to find the truth for yourself without getting injured, otherwise you wouldn't be able to go out and spread to truth to others.
 
That was my point, 1's and 0's are analog signals and are susceptible to interference, but skeptics think they are not. They say you can just use a coat hanger to transmit the signals.

If they had proper understanding about audio they would already be using the tweaks but instead they call it woo-woo because they don't know any better. Anyone open-minded enough to try it knows the truth. Every audiophile forum laughs at this place, why do you think they don't post here? Because they are busy enjoying their improvements and laughing at the skeptics' ignorance.
In audiophile forums trying to make the skeptics understand is like trying to explain color with a color blind person. Trying to make the skeptics understand at Randi forum is like trying to explain color with a completely blind person.
There are no 1's and 0's in the analog signals......:D

And your tweaks have nothing to do with how audio equipment works.

Audiophile forums only support their woo-woo because they make money off of it, take the money away and the woo-woo goes away.

Paul


:) :) :)
 
Imagine how bad you will feel when you are suddenly faced with the truth and you realize all those years have been a waste. The solid ground on which you stand on will slide away and you will fall to the ground and hurt yourself.
Why do you think I haven't posted the proof yet? I'm giving you a chance to find the truth for yourself without getting injured, otherwise you wouldn't be able to go out and spread to truth to others.
No, sorry, you are the one that is in the mirror when you say that. I just wonder how many other woo-woos you believe in other that the audio ones.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
So, who to heck do you think your talking about here, no I don't see you in my house....

And no speakers are not better, the stereo separation is not correct because the music was not setup for headsets.

Paul

:) :) :)
You don't know the meaning of the word better. Headphones will always be more true to the source because they don't add room colorations, the stereo separation with headphones is correct, but the recording was not.

Orchestral recordings are recorded in such a way to compensate for the playback with loudspeakers in a room with long distance to the ears. The microphone positions are wrong, and so are the speaker positions. Positioning the microphones around a human head and playing it back with headphones has the least coloration.
 
People with grillz and gold chains sitting in a car with hydraulics and spinners like to boost up the volume so they can "feel it". It's too bad those people will never know what proper audio quality is all about. Headphones are better than speakers + million dollars worth of room treatments.

Of course everyone knows that you can't actually 'feel' music.

This is where your headphones leave you missing out on half the picture.

Oh yeah, my little Toyota Echo and I are about as far from the gold chain, spinner rims crowd as you can get. The sound system is an SQ system not a DB system.
 
There are no 1's and 0's in the analog signals......:D
I was talking about digital cables and jitter. Skeptics don't know that external interference affects timing of the data. All they see is perfect 1's and 0's, and if the same data matches in the other end they think the cable is good enough for real-time data output.


And your tweaks have nothing to do with how audio equipment works.
If muddy sound comes out of the speakers it doesn't work properly, but skeptics can't hear it because their ears are even muddier. Broken sound is good enough for them because they can't hear the difference. Putting the audio system on top of a vibrating floor inside an EMI field and feeding it dirty AC might be acceptable to a skeptic, but not to me.


Audiophile forums only support their woo-woo because they make money off of it, take the money away and the woo-woo goes away.

Paul


:) :) :)
I haven't seen any ads in forums for my tweaks, I searched for them myself. Magix magnetic levitation feet isn't woo-woo because the vibrations are removed and it can be measured. ERS Paper isn't woo-woo because it has been measured just like other passive shielding materials.

Skeptics have serious mental issues and they need help fast!
 
You don't know the meaning of the word better. Headphones will always be more true to the source because they don't add room colorations, the stereo separation with headphones is correct, but the recording was not.

Orchestral recordings are recorded in such a way to compensate for the playback with loudspeakers in a room with long distance to the ears. The microphone positions are wrong, and so are the speaker positions. Positioning the microphones around a human head and playing it back with headphones has the least coloration.
You say you don't listen to music, so how would you know. And still it doesn't take away from the fact that you have shown that you know nothing about audio equipment, and everytime I think I know how little you do know you go and write more and show me that it even less than that.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
I was talking about digital cables and jitter. Skeptics don't know that external interference affects timing of the data. All they see is perfect 1's and 0's, and if the same data matches in the other end they think the cable is good enough for real-time data output.
Once again that show how little you know about computers and digital audio, you know nothing about timing circuits, buffers, etc. The signal coming in does not, not and again, does not go directly to the DA converter, daaaa. There is interlacing, digital correction, etc. Daaaaaaa.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
No, sorry, you are the one that is in the mirror when you say that. I just wonder how many other woo-woos you believe in other that the audio ones.

Paul

:) :) :)
Usually when a skeptic responds within minutes he hasn't had time to give enough thought about the idea of himself being wrong. Skeptics perceive the world differently than the sane people do. They are only looking at others instead of looking at themselves. It is easier to understand yourself than someone else because you haven't experienced what the other person has, you are just perceiving it. That's what skeptics do to themselves, they are perceiving themselves as Gods that know it all, but they don't look deep inside themselves because they are afraid of what they may find. So they have closed their mind and thrown away the key so nobody else can enter. Eventually they start making automatic responses based on the belief that they know everything and others know nothing. Placebo is what it is, and they make automatic responses to deny it.
 
but skeptics can't hear it because their ears are even muddier.
So I guess skeptics don't drive cars, don't ride in planes, and we can't see the TV too.

Paul

:) :) :)

Daaaaaaa

I have been doing audio for over 40 years now, same old woo-woo different package.......
 
Usually when a skeptic responds within minutes he hasn't had time to give enough thought about the idea of himself being wrong.
What, do you think that you have something new that I haven't heard before, noooooooo. Also do you think you are the only one on the planet that can think fast, noooooo.

Paul

:) :) :)
 

Back
Top Bottom