Mike Walter (USA Today) Responds to Conspiracists Misquoting Him
- Thread starter Totovader
- Start date
Totovader
Game Warden
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2007
- Messages
- 3,321
Forgetting of course that your witnesses could be incorrect- is this the ONLY evidence you rely on?
I repeat the question, is this the ONLY EVIDENCE YOU RELY ON? TWO WITNESSES WHO COULD EASILY BE MISTAKEN? (and in fact contradict your claims)
twinstead
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Messages
- 12,374
Lyte did you ask your witnesses what their explanation for the majority of additional witnesses contradicting what they were saying? Did you ask them what their explanation was for the damage to those light poles?
I wonder what those witnesses would think had they been interviewed by REAL investigators instead of people with an agenda.
I wonder what those witnesses would think had they been interviewed by REAL investigators instead of people with an agenda.
Last edited:
Haha!
Too much!
There is NOTHING that contradicts the north side claim smoking gun in either of those interviews.
Brooks cleared up for us and the world on camera that he did NOT really see the light poles get hit.
Funny how Stephen McGraw said the same thing!
A W Smith
Philosopher
you know thats not the one. it doesn't even show the annex. i am looking for it now. bakinafew
its the photo of the annex and citgo you pieced together. The one where the last couple of wings of the annex don't line up.
jaydeehess
Penultimate Amazing
,, and Lagasse also states that England's car was north of its actual location stating that others had erroneously placed it to the south. Even you know this was not true but Lagasse is positive he is correct.
Robert puts the plane on a path that took it over the space between two trees on the Citgo lot. Certainly no where near Lagasse's placement of it. Robert changes his flight path as you interview him but states it had to be north of the station.
Every single other witness (all of whom you chose to ignore) who saw the plane to the south must now be wrong or liars and the 4 you interviewed correct.
Are these 4 the only people at or near the Citgo who witnesses the plane Lyte? The Citgo video shows it to be a busy place. Did you attempt to find any who say it was south of the station?
Robert puts the plane on a path that took it over the space between two trees on the Citgo lot. Certainly no where near Lagasse's placement of it. Robert changes his flight path as you interview him but states it had to be north of the station.
Every single other witness (all of whom you chose to ignore) who saw the plane to the south must now be wrong or liars and the 4 you interviewed correct.
Are these 4 the only people at or near the Citgo who witnesses the plane Lyte? The Citgo video shows it to be a busy place. Did you attempt to find any who say it was south of the station?
Who are you talking about?
We haven't been able to find one that directly contradicts them.
A small handful indirectly contradict them such as Lloyd and Frank Probst.
But we already know that Lloyd's account is beyond implausible anyway.
jaydeehess
Penultimate Amazing
Further to that he relies on ONE witness for his senario of the plane rising from which he deduces a pull up and flyover even though that very witness did not see a flyover.
Ah.
I didn't make that.
I actually snagged that image from Russell Pickering.
It demonstrates the official flight path.
What about it?
I added Edward's flight path in blue.
Thousands of pieces of evidence refute “Researcher’s Edition” before it is done.
SGT William Lagasse and SGT Chadwick Brooks refute their current information 5 years ago. This includes aircraft impact and hitting light posts.
The FDR and radar data refute your story. The DNA, the witnesses, and all that the CIT have are just here all debunked.
Citizen Investigation Team LLC, is not very good at this making up stuff, even LCF posters can see the fraud.
What? You must remember this means you have to ignore thousands pieces of evidence to believe this. Therefore this is debunked by thousands pieces of evidence.
The truth movement is the most ironic group ever and the Pentacon keeps the CON going! Ironic to the max.
Last edited:
lol yes, badly, since if you married the two images correctly the plane would be south of citgo.
twinstead
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Messages
- 12,374
So no witness on that day contradicts yours, except a 'small handful'?
That 'small handful' (including quite a few more folks than Lloyd and Probst) directly contradicts your theory, as does the physical evidence. Do your witnesses constitute more than a 'small handful' or less than a 'small handful'?
Are you saying that in your mind there is not a single eye witness account that is contrary to your theory?
Last edited:
You are wrong.
Here is the image that one of you guys used while I was "suspended" here just after we released the film.
But whoever made it decided to ignore the angle of the path that Edward reported.
I illustrated Edward's true path in yellow:
True it's south of Brooks and Lagasse but it's perfect with Robert's path and ALL are 100% north of Columbia Pike and the gas station and irreconcilable with the light pole path/official story.
A W Smith
Philosopher
Lyte do you see now how your paith flight path is straignt but the building bends around the line? ill be right back with a perspective looking west. And heres an interesting find from the security cam video at the pentagon. when you view the video Look how tall the security gate and stop light machine is. compare the shadow to height ratio! and its directed north and a bit west. That puts a shadow of an object 185 feet high more than a football field (including the end zones) to the north and west!
What about it?
He simply re-establishes the claim that the entire plane crossed over to the north side of Columbia Pike which is irreconcilable with the physical damage flight path and puts the plane on course for the north of the gas station.
No I don't really see what you mean nor does it matter because you can simply correct it by using this image that is not spliced:
Russell Pickering spliced that other one and I just used it as a rough example because it demonstrates the official flight path so well.
But feel free and use this other image instead.
The yellow line is a conservative estimate of Edward's interpretation of the flight path of the plane crossing over to the north side of Columbia Pike.
