Mike Walter (USA Today) Responds to Conspiracists Misquoting Him

Lyte Trip said:
View of the Pentagon but NOT of the alleged impact.

The image you posted is clearly a telephoto shot from crystal city.

Totally misleading.
Click to expand...

I don't have a telephoto lens, just a kit lens that came with my camera. That is simply how the Pentagon appears from Arlington Ridge Rd. (with several high rise apartment and condo buildings adjacent to the spot)

This is from the same spot, taken a few years ago with my cheap point and shoot camera.

650px-Pentagon_dc_skyline.jpg


From here, you would have seen the plane come in, hit the Pentagon, explode, disappear into the building, and no fly over. Imagine being ~10 stories higher in one of the adjacent apartment buildings, and the vantage point is that much better.

Terrance Kean, who lived in a nearby apartment building, heard the noise of loud jet engines, glanced out his window, and saw "very, very large passenger jet." He watched "it just plow right into the side of the Pentagon. The nose penetrated into the portico. And then it sort of disappeared, and there was fire and smoke everywhere."

The view from I-395 is also excellent, as is the view if you are right on Washington Blvd such as where Lloyd England was.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Oh really?

Please post links to any interviews with eyewitnesses to the plane that he has conducted.
Click to expand...

Show us of the hundred or so, that don't agree with you, that you have interviewed?
Never mind your own witnesses, destroy your fictional pardigm!
No one is buying your flick, even fellow twoofers.

doglaugh.gif
 
For reference, here are the locations. Crystal City is not on here; It is off to the right.

725px-Lytetrip_witnesspaths.JPG
 
Lyte Trip said:
He is either:

1. Accidentally confusing charred bodies of Pentagon workers in office chairs as having been "strapped" into seats.

2. Embellishing without malice intent.

3. Lying to cover up the crime.


I have no way of knowing which but these are the only possibilities.
Click to expand...

There are no levels that you wont sink to huh Lyte?
 
I'm not even asking what it would take for you to admit you are wrong, Lyte, I'm just asking you to stop declaring 'inside job' like it's a done deal even before your 'investigation' is complete.
 
Debunk911Myths said:
I don't have a telephoto lens, just a kit lens that came with my camera. That is simply how the Pentagon appears from Arlington Ridge Rd. (with several high rise apartment and condo buildings adjacent to the spot)

This is from the same spot, taken a few years ago with my cheap point and shoot camera.

http://www.debunk911myths.org/topic..._dc_skyline.jpg/650px-Pentagon_dc_skyline.jpg

From here, you would have seen the plane come in, hit the Pentagon, explode, disappear into the building, and no fly over. Imagine being ~10 stories higher in one of the adjacent apartment buildings, and the vantage point is that much better.

Terrance Kean, who lived in a nearby apartment building, heard the noise of loud jet engines, glanced out his window, and saw "very, very large passenger jet." He watched "it just plow right into the side of the Pentagon. The nose penetrated into the portico. And then it sort of disappeared, and there was fire and smoke everywhere."

The view from I-395 is also excellent, as is the view if you are right on Washington Blvd such as where Lloyd England was.
Click to expand...

Even still that is no detailed view of the alleged impact.

Yes it would be a detailed view of the fly over as it would be a detailed view of the reported plane that "shadowed" the AA jet and veered off over the Pentagon just after the explosion.

Did Terrance Kean see this plane?
 
Plus you are incorrect about the view from 395.

It is not near as good as from higher up in the crystal city highrises (which are further away)

When I get my external harddrive back from our video editor I'll post videos I took of the drive.
 
Last edited:
T.A.M. said:
SO your answer is you will not tell me who, in authority, you have brought this to... despite the fact that your "evidence" is available to everyone on the internet, who can vist your site and watch your video which presents your earth shattering evidence.

Sorry, but I have to say, that given your evidence is placed on a public accessable website, that your statement above rings hollow. Only time will tell...

TAM;)
Click to expand...

BINGO!
 
twinstead said:
I'm not even asking what it would take for you to admit you are wrong, Lyte, I'm just asking you to stop declaring 'inside job' like it's a done deal even before your 'investigation' is complete.
Click to expand...

I will.

Lyte- answer my Conspiracist Challenge.

What would it take for you to admit you're wrong?

Flight path damage- including the light poles and generator? Guess not.

An overwhelming number of witnesses giving very detailed accounts? No?

How about ACTUAL PIECES OF THE PLANE? Not even that, huh?

Ok, maybe the recovered bodies? Oh wait- those were planted, right?

How about the FDR information? No? Odd.

DNA evidence? Certainly not that...


So what would it take?

We know that you don't need any evidence to draw your conclusion- all you need is a couple of witness which don't even corroborate each other, but certainly contradict the many other witnesses and all the evidence- and then you still go beyond what they're saying and invent your own nonsense.... we know this- we know you make crap up. So what kind of EVIDENCE would it take for you to admit you're wrong?

If you REALLY want to pretend to be an "investigator" or a scientist- if you are REALLY going to pretend to be interested in the truth- then you should AT LEAST be able to answer this question if not already have appropriate rebuttals to the responses.

That's called science, Lyte. How is your little mock investigation at all scientific?
 
Lyte Trip said:
Even still that is no detailed view of the alleged impact.

Yes it would be a detailed view of the fly over as it would be a detailed view of the reported plane that "shadowed" the AA jet and veered off over the Pentagon just after the explosion.

Did Terrance Kean see this plane?
Click to expand...

It's more than good enough view to see the plane heading into the Pentagon, and the flight ending there in a massive explosion.

From a 14-story apartment building (It's close to the spot where my photo is taken from), Mr. Kean saw a "very, very large passenger jet" that "just plowed right into the side of the Pentagon. The nose penetrated into the portico. And then it sort of disappeared, and there was fire and smoke everywhere."

What kind of plane do you think shadowed the AA jet? another "very very large passenger jet"? or what?
 
Just curious Lyte, going back to the issue of the two 'do not enter' signs.

When you were interviewing your witnesses, and they specifically pointed to the one sign further north, did you point out the other sign and ask if they were sure it wasn't at that sign that they saw the plane?

I ask because the 'do not enter' sign is obviously a landmark your witness uses to confirm the path he is describing. If he is mistaken about which sign he saw on the day then his testimony would match the official account.

So, did you ask him to confirm 100% that the sign to the north was definately the one his saw on the day?

Additionally, did you ask any of your eyewitnesses to reconsider the testimony they were giving you in the light of how this testimony did not match the official flightpath of the plane?

Did you stress to them the importance of what they were telling you?
 
uk_dave said:
Additionally, did you ask any of your eyewitnesses to reconsider the testimony they were giving you in the light of how this testimony did not match the official flightpath of the plane?

Did you stress to them the importance of what they were telling you?
Click to expand...

I suggest you watch the interviews again.
 
Mince said:
Edit. Nevermind.

This loser is going to soak up a lot of our valuable time because it's his last refuge. [...]
Click to expand...
Yep. If you can't convince anyone, try to bog them down in pointless debate.

Lyte claims his witness "100% corroborate each other", but this is only true if you go with the pathetically vague "north of CITGO" claim. Once you get more specific, that "100%" corroboration drops to 0% pretty damn quickly.

Not to mention that he has to outright dismiss statements from his own witnesses in order to "prove" that the plane didn't hit the Pentagon.

What a joke. There's really no point in wasting this much time on such nonsense. Lyte doesn't want to be right. He just wants to believe he is, and he accomplishes that by "debating" here...

Ignored.
 
Last edited:
This is the location people will find when they search for the http://www.thepentacon.com/

When they come here they can get the "You better believe it's a smoking gun" version of the fraud they almost bought!

Key words are important so a simple google search will find this site so they can save 9.95 plus SH for fraud. They will find Sgt Brooks et al, original testimony and see that the Pentacon is fraud.

Simple put your best stuff here and save some one 10 bucks.

Highlights of testimony from eyewitnesses/Pentagon police officers SGT William Lagasse and SGT Chadwick Brooks, and then they can find their original stuff.

In an interview conducted in December 2001 , Lagasse described the secondary explosions and the search and recovery of injured Pentagon personnel. Brooks saw the hijacked plane clip lampposts and nosedive into the Pentagon and described the ensuing scenes of chaos in his interview, taped November 25, 2001.

When they release and try to sell the fraud called the “Researcher’s Edition” people can search google and find the truth.
 
Last edited:
Lyte Trip said:
I suggest you watch the interviews again.
Click to expand...

Actually, I'm waiting for the release of the Researchers Edition.

That chick in the pictures looks like she'd have a sexy voice.

And I have a 4 hour slot in my life coming up spare sometime soon.

How's the RE coming along?
 
uk_dave said:
Additionally, did you ask any of your eyewitnesses to reconsider the testimony they were giving you in the light of how this testimony did not match the official flightpath of the plane?

Did you stress to them the importance of what they were telling you?
Click to expand...

For real bro.

Did you even watch the film?

I virtually hyper focused on this point.

I asked them in as many possible ways I could think of to ask the same question even AFTER I had them all illustrate it!

"What is the percentage chance that the plane was on the north side of the station?"

More than 100%

"What is the percentage chance that the plane was on the side of the station?"

Less than 0%


"The official story says the plane flew on the south side of the station and hit these poles."(points to poles on illustration)

Impossible
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom